Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PEBO vs FFBC vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
PEBO vs FFBC vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.31B | $3.38B | $20.26B | $28.76B | $9.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $593M | $1.26B | $11.66B | $21.09B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $107M | $256M | $2.67B | $3.20B | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 68.4% | 37.6% | 60.8% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 25.5% | 17.9% | 24.4% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 10.2x | 6.2x | 6.6x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $734M | $1.19B | $4.01B | $29.12B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $179M | $599M | $798M | $102M |
PEBO vs FFBC vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO) | 100 | 172.0 | +72.0% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFBC) | 100 | 232.5 | +132.5% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 55.1 | -44.9% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEBO vs FFBC vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEBO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 4.5%
- 132.4% 10Y total return vs FFBC's 111.1%
- NIM 3.7% vs FFBC's 3.0%
- 4.5% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FFBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +39.4% vs FISV's -68.0%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- 22.9% margin vs FISV's 15.2%
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs JKHY's 1.86
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.86
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Beta 0.10, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
- 7.2% revenue growth vs PEBO's 0.4%
- Beta 0.10 vs FISV's 0.87
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs PEBO's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.86 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs FISV's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs FISV's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs FISV's -68.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs PEBO's 1.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs 5.8% |
PEBO vs FFBC vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PEBO vs FFBC vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
FISV leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • FFBC leads 1 • PEBO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 35.6x PEBO's $593M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FISV's 15.2%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $593M | $1.3B | $11.7B | $21.1B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $343M | $4.1B | $7.5B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $107M | $256M | $2.7B | $3.2B | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | $330M | $2.8B | $4.0B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +68.4% | +37.6% | +60.8% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +25.5% | +17.9% | +24.4% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +20.3% | +22.9% | +15.2% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +26.2% | +23.9% | +19.0% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +30.1% | -2.0% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.1% | -5.9% | +30.6% | -29.1% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.24x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $3.4B | $20.3B | $28.8B | $9.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $4.4B | $23.7B | $57.1B | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.24x | 12.14x | 52.27x | 8.48x | 20.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.68x | 10.17x | 6.24x | 6.62x | 18.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | 1.12x | 2.14x | 0.24x | 2.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.80x | 12.78x | 6.50x | 6.44x | 11.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 2.68x | 1.90x | 1.36x | 3.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 1.12x | 1.46x | 1.14x | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.21x | 10.65x | 7.21x | 6.63x | 15.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $9 for PEBO. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFBC scores 7/9 vs PEBO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +9.8% | +18.4% | +12.4% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.3% | +7.5% | +4.0% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +6.4% | +6.0% | +8.1% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +8.5% | +6.6% | +10.2% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.43x | 0.29x | 1.13x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $545M | $1.0B | $3.4B | $28.3B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $179M | $599M | $798M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $734M | $1.2B | $4.0B | $29.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.89x | 21.16x | 6.39x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FFBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FFBC five years ago would be worth $14,861 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FFBC leads with a +39.4% total return vs FISV's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FFBC at 17.9% vs FISV's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | +30.7% | -38.9% | -18.0% | -27.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | +39.4% | -49.4% | -68.0% | -27.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.6% | +63.9% | -18.9% | -54.3% | -15.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.6% | +48.6% | -67.3% | -50.7% | -14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +111.1% | -25.6% | +1.8% | +74.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.6% | +17.9% | -6.8% | -23.0% | -5.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FFBC and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISV's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FFBC currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 30.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.84x | 0.61x | 0.87x | 0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.64 | $32.30 | $82.74 | $177.36 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.49 | $22.93 | $37.91 | $51.78 | $124.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +100.0% | +47.4% | +30.3% | +66.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 64.1 | 30.8 | 40.8 | 27.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 225K | 800K | 5.6M | 5.7M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PEBO and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEBO as "Hold", FFBC as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -0.2% for FFBC (target: $32). For income investors, PEBO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.49% vs JKHY's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $32.25 | $62.88 | $71.15 | $194.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 19 | 37 | 60 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +3.1% | +4.2% | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 2 | 1 | — | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.64 | $0.99 | $1.63 | — | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +7.0% | +20.5% | +0.4% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PEBO vs FFBC vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEBO or FFBC or FIS or FISV or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEBO or FFBC or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEBO or FFBC or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, First Financial Bancorp.
(FFBC) delivered a total return of +48. 6%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PEBO returned +132. 4% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEBO or FFBC or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Fiserv, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning FISV is approximately 743% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEBO or FFBC or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEBO or FFBC or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
First Financial Bancorp.
(FFBC) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFBC leads at 68. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEBO or FFBC or FIS or FISV or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEBO or FFBC or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
In this comparison, PEBO (4.
5% yield), FIS (4. 2% yield), FFBC (3. 1% yield), JKHY (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PEBO or FFBC or FIS or FISV or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +74. 8%, FISV: +1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEBO and FFBC and FIS and FISV and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (PEBO (Financial Services) and FFBC (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and FISV (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PEBO is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PEBO, FFBC, FIS, JKHY pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.