PED vs TPVG

For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 28. 5% for PEDEVCO Corp. (PED). PEDEVCO Corp. (PED) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PEDEVCO Corp. (PED) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, PEDEVCO Corp.

(PED) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. at 4. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) delivered a total return of -19. 0%, compared to -45. 3% for PEDEVCO Corp. (PED). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +87. 8% versus PED's -65. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PEDEVCO Corp.

(PED) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 82β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately -202% more volatile than PED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PEDEVCO Corp. (PED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 28. 5% for PEDEVCO Corp. (PED). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PEDEVCO Corp. grew EPS 65. 7% year-over-year, compared to 48. 8% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 45. 0% for PEDEVCO Corp. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 11. 9% for PED. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 60.

7% to $8. 95.

In this comparison, TPVG (18.

4% yield) pays a dividend. PED does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, PEDEVCO Corp.

(PED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 82)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PED: -65. 0%, TPVG: +87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (PED (Energy) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

TPVG pays a dividend while PED does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.