Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PEN vs INVA vs ISRG vs PRGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
PEN vs INVA vs ISRG vs PRGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $12.77B | $1.93B | $161.07B | $1.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.45B | $424M | $10.58B | $4.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $504M | $2.98B | $-1.82B |
| Gross Margin | 67.4% | 76.2% | 66.3% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.9% | 14.8% | 30.5% | -4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 65.2x | 11.9x | 43.8x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $220M | $269M | $303M | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $187M | $551M | $3.37B | $532M |
PEN vs INVA vs ISRG vs PRGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penumbra, Inc. (PEN) | 100 | 186.9 | +86.9% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 164.6 | +64.6% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 236.7 | +136.7% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.6 | -78.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEN vs INVA vs ISRG vs PRGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.13
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- PEG 1.15 vs ISRG's 2.01
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
ISRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs INVA's 94.9%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
PRGO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 43.8x), PEG 1.15 vs 2.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs PRGO's 1.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.7% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs PRGO's -19.8%, ROIC 14.2% vs 3.7% |
PEN vs INVA vs ISRG vs PRGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PEN vs INVA vs ISRG vs PRGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INVA leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 2 • ISRG leads 1 • PEN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 25.0x INVA's $424M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $424M | $10.6B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $200M | $86M | $3.8B | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $504M | $3.0B | -$1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $213M | $181M | $2.8B | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.4% | +76.2% | +66.3% | +34.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +14.8% | +30.5% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +118.9% | +28.2% | -43.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +42.8% | +26.8% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.6% | +10.6% | +23.0% | -7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.0% | +4.0% | +18.8% | -56.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 90% valuation discount to PEN's 71.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), INVA offers better value at 0.67x vs ISRG's 2.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.8B | $1.9B | $161.1B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.8B | $1.7B | $158.0B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 71.82x | 6.91x | 57.62x | -1.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 65.17x | 11.91x | 43.84x | 5.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.67x | 2.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 61.91x | 8.10x | 43.62x | 7.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.09x | 4.55x | 16.00x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.93x | 1.65x | 9.17x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.97x | 9.88x | 64.67x | 11.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-51 for PRGO. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PEN scores 7/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.3% | +46.5% | +16.9% | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | +32.4% | +14.8% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | +14.2% | +15.0% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +12.4% | +16.5% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.23x | 0.02x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33M | -$282M | -$3.1B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $187M | $551M | $3.4B | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $269M | $303M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 304.65x | 63.45x | — | -7.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,986 for PRGO. Over the past 12 months, INVA leads with a +21.7% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVA at 25.0% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | +14.7% | -19.3% | -13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | +21.7% | -15.4% | -51.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.5% | +95.2% | +49.6% | -58.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.6% | +94.4% | +58.7% | -60.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +505.9% | +94.9% | +554.2% | -77.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +25.0% | +14.4% | -25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRGO's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 0.13x | 1.02x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $362.41 | $25.15 | $603.88 | $28.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $221.26 | $16.52 | $427.84 | $9.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +90.7% | +75.1% | +41.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.7 | 39.9 | 42.4 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 544K | 621K | 1.8M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEN as "Hold", INVA as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 70.6% upside for PRGO (target: $20) vs 14.6% for PEN (target: $372). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $371.92 | $37.67 | $622.60 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 10 | 55 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
INVA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PRGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
PEN vs INVA vs ISRG vs PRGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEN or INVA or ISRG or PRGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEN or INVA or ISRG or PRGO?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Penumbra, Inc. at 71. 8x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innoviva, Inc. wins at 1. 15x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEN or INVA or ISRG or PRGO?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -60. 1% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus PRGO's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEN or INVA or ISRG or PRGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Perrigo Company plc's 1. 18β — meaning PRGO is approximately 837% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEN or INVA or ISRG or PRGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Penumbra, Inc. grew EPS 1156% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, PEN leads at 18. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEN or INVA or ISRG or PRGO?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus 8. 1% for PRGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INVA leads at 72. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEN or INVA or ISRG or PRGO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 65. 2x for Penumbra, Inc. — 59. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 70. 6% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEN or INVA or ISRG or PRGO?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PEN, INVA, ISRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PEN or INVA or ISRG or PRGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Penumbra, Inc.
(PEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), +501. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEN: +501. 4%, PRGO: -77. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEN and INVA and ISRG and PRGO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PEN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. PRGO pays a dividend while PEN, INVA, ISRG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.