Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
PEN vs ISRG vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
PEN vs ISRG vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $12.67B | $159.85B | $2.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.45B | $10.58B | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $2.98B | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | 67.4% | 66.3% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.9% | 30.5% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | 65.8x | 43.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $220M | $303M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $187M | $3.37B | $103M |
PEN vs ISRG vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penumbra, Inc. (PEN) | 100 | 186.9 | +86.9% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 232.8 | +132.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEN vs ISRG vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.23
- Rev growth 17.5%, EPS growth 11.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 15.4%, current ratio 6.64x
ISRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs PEN's 5.0%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3%
- Better valuation composite
NVCR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.6% vs ISRG's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs -16.4% |
PEN vs ISRG vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PEN vs ISRG vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 15.7x NVCR's $674M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $10.6B | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $200M | $3.8B | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $3.0B | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $213M | $2.8B | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.4% | +66.3% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +30.5% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +28.2% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +26.8% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.6% | +23.0% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.0% | +18.8% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ISRG and NVCR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 57.2x trailing earnings, ISRG trades at a 20% valuation discount to PEN's 71.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ISRG's 43.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PEN's 61.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.7B | $159.8B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.7B | $156.8B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 71.29x | 57.19x | -14.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 65.80x | 43.35x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.63x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 61.47x | 43.28x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.03x | 15.88x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.87x | 9.10x | 5.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.45x | 64.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PEN scores 7/9 vs NVCR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.3% | +16.9% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | +14.8% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | +15.0% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +16.5% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.02x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33M | -$3.1B | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $187M | $3.4B | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $303M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 304.65x | — | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $16,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $983 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, PEN leads with a +11.6% total return vs ISRG's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.1% vs NVCR's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | -19.9% | +36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.6% | -16.4% | +2.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.7% | +48.5% | -74.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | +61.7% | -90.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +501.4% | +549.2% | +38.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | +14.1% | -36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PEN and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs ISRG's 74.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 1.00x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $362.41 | $603.88 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $221.26 | $427.84 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +74.5% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 43.6 | 70.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 533K | 1.8M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEN as "Hold", ISRG as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.3% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 14.8% for PEN (target: $370).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $369.83 | $622.60 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 55 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
PEN vs ISRG vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEN or ISRG or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) offers the better valuation at 57. 2x trailing P/E (43. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEN or ISRG or NVCR?
On trailing P/E, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the cheapest at 57. 2x versus Penumbra, Inc. at 71. 3x. On forward P/E, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. is actually cheaper at 43. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEN or ISRG or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +61. 7%, compared to -90. 2% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +549. 2% versus NVCR's +38. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEN or ISRG or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Penumbra, Inc.
(PEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 838% more volatile than PEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEN or ISRG or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Penumbra, Inc. grew EPS 1156% year-over-year, compared to 21. 8% for NovoCure Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, PEN leads at 18. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEN or ISRG or NVCR?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEN or ISRG or NVCR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) trades at 43. 3x forward P/E versus 65. 8x for Penumbra, Inc. — 22. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 87. 3% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEN or ISRG or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PEN or ISRG or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Penumbra, Inc.
(PEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), +501. 4% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEN: +501. 4%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEN and ISRG and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PEN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.