Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PEPG vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PEPG vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $123M | $1712.35T | $73.68B | $5.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $14.92B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-90M | $-168M | $4.42B | $153M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 84.5% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 24.3% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.3x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $22M | $2.71B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $194M | $3.12B | $1.12B |
PEPG vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PepGen Inc. (PEPG) | 100 | 16.0 | -84.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 132.4 | +32.4% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 106.7 | +6.7% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 118.6 | +18.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEPG vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 11.94x
- Beta 0.17, current ratio 11.94x
- Beta 0.17 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs ALKS's +16.5%
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- 90.0% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- 1.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ALKS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs ALKS's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
PEPG vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PEPG vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 2 • DBVT leads 1 • PEPG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKS's 9.8%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $14.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$90M | -$112M | $4.2B | $212M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$90M | -$168M | $4.4B | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$82M | -$151M | $4.2B | $392M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +84.5% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +24.3% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +29.6% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +27.9% | +25.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +19.0% | +28.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.3% | +91.5% | -7.2% | -4.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 31% valuation discount to ALKS's 24.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALKS's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $123M | $1712.35T | $73.7B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80M | $1712.35T | $73.3B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.84x | -0.76x | 17.09x | 24.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.35x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.70x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.78x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 5.14x | 4.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.51x | 0.66x | 2.46x | 3.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.06x | 12.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -75.7% | -130.2% | +14.3% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.4% | -89.0% | +11.1% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -73.2% | — | +8.9% | +18.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.4% | -145.7% | +10.2% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.13x | 0.09x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44M | -$172M | -$412M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $194M | $3.1B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $22M | $2.7B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 108.44x | 32.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,389 for PEPG. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs ALKS's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs PEPG's -50.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -75.0% | +4.9% | -8.5% | +25.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.1% | +110.4% | +27.1% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.1% | +19.7% | -5.1% | +14.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | -69.1% | +43.6% | +60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | -87.0% | +90.0% | -11.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.7% | +6.2% | -1.7% | +4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PEPG and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PEPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs PEPG's 22.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 1.26x | 0.81x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.80 | $26.18 | $821.11 | $36.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $7.53 | $476.49 | $25.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.9% | +76.3% | +86.4% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.6 | 48.1 | 44.9 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 252K | 631K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
REGN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEPG as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 291.1% upside for PEPG (target: $7) vs 22.1% for REGN (target: $866). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $46.33 | $865.68 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 | 48 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | +0.5% |
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). ALKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
PEPG vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEPG or DBVT or REGN or ALKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PepGen Inc. (PEPG) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEPG or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Alkermes plc at 24. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEPG or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -86. 1% for PepGen Inc. (PEPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REGN returned +90. 0% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEPG or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 627% more volatile than PEPG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEPG or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PepGen Inc. grew EPS 25. 6% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEPG or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEPG or DBVT or REGN or ALKS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PEPG: 291.
1% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEPG or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. PEPG, DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PEPG or DBVT or REGN or ALKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEPG: -86. 1%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEPG and DBVT and REGN and ALKS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PEPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.