Waste Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PESI vs CECO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
PESI vs CECO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls |
| Market Cap | $218M | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $812M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $17M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 34.3% |
| Operating Margin | -19.0% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 51.7x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $33M |
PESI vs CECO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 210.7 | +110.7% |
| CECO Environmental … (CECO) | 100 | 1624.3 | +1524.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PESI vs CECO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.85
CECO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 280.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- 14.0% 10Y total return vs PESI's 200.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 7.7%, current ratio 1.34x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.8% revenue growth vs PESI's 4.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs PESI's -22.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +239.2% vs PESI's +34.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs PESI's -15.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -21.7% |
PESI vs CECO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PESI vs CECO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CECO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CECO is the larger business by revenue, generating $812M annually — 13.2x PESI's $62M. CECO is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -22.3%. On growth, CECO holds the edge at +21.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $812M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +34.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.0% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.3% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.3% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +21.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.8% | -91.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PESI leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $218M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $211M | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.71x | 62.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 51.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 40.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.54x | 4.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.34x | 9.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CECO leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CECO delivers a 5.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-25 for PESI. CECO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PESI's 0.09x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.9% | +5.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.2% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.7% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.7% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -26.91x | 2.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CECO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CECO five years ago would be worth $120,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,271 for PESI. Over the past 12 months, CECO leads with a +239.2% total return vs PESI's +34.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CECO at 92.4% vs PESI's 8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.8% | +44.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.6% | +239.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.3% | +612.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | +1106.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.4% | +1396.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | +92.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CECO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CECO is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CECO currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs PESI's 71.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.50 | $90.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.02 | $24.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.4% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 79.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 164K | 699K |
Analyst Outlook
PESI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PESI as "Hold" and CECO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.8% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs -0.1% for CECO (target: $86).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $86.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CECO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PESI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
PESI vs CECO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PESI or CECO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the stronger pick with 38. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) offers the better valuation at 63. 0x trailing P/E (51. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PESI or CECO?
Over the past 5 years, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) delivered a total return of +1106%, compared to +62. 7% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CECO returned +1397% versus PESI's +200. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PESI or CECO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 35% more volatile than CECO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 9% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PESI or CECO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is pulling ahead at 38. 8% versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CECO Environmental Corp. grew EPS 280. 6% year-over-year, compared to 43. 6% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CECO leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PESI or CECO?
CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CECO leads at 6. 7% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CECO leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PESI or CECO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 52.
8% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — PESI or CECO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PESI or CECO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1397% 10Y return). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CECO: +1397%, PESI: +200. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PESI and CECO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CECO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.