Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PFAI vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
PFAI vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $29M | $5.05T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $286K | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 47.3% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 177.3x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $163K | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $686K | $10.61B |
PFAI vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle Food Group… (PFAI) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 190.7 | +90.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PFAI vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.53
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 34.9%, current ratio 1.34x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 1.34x
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 234.3% 10Y total return vs PFAI's -6.5%
- 65.5% revenue growth vs PFAI's 56.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs PFAI's 56.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 177.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs PFAI's 8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs NVDA's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.9% vs PFAI's +20.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs PFAI's 6.1% |
PFAI vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PFAI vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 65637.4x PFAI's $3M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFAI's 8.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.3% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.2% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PFAI and NVDA each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 42.4x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 76% valuation discount to PFAI's 177.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFAI's 29.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 37.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $5.05T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $5.05T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 177.25x | 42.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.50x | 37.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.75x | 23.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 79.36x | 32.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 52.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $61 for PFAI. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFAI's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFAI scores 6/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +61.3% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +34.7% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$523,124 | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $685,796 | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $162,672 | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $143,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,350 for PFAI. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +82.9% total return vs PFAI's +20.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 92.4% vs PFAI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +72.4% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.6% | +82.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.5% | +612.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.5% | +1331.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.5% | +23433.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.2% | +92.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFAI and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFAI is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs PFAI's 75.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.93 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $110.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.9% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 166.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
PFAI vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFAI or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 56. 6% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 42. 4x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PFAI or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 42.
4x versus Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares at 177. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PFAI or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1331%, compared to -6.
5% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +234. 3% versus PFAI's -6. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PFAI or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 225% more volatile than PFAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 35% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PFAI or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 56. 6% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -63. 7% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PFAI or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus 8. 7% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 18. 7% for PFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — PFAI or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PFAI or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53)). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFAI: -6. 5%, NVDA: +234. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PFAI and NVDA?
These companies operate in different sectors (PFAI (Consumer Cyclical) and NVDA (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.