PGC vs OCFC

For growth investors, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) is the stronger pick with 9.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp.

(OCFC) is the cheapest at 15. 9x versus Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation at 21. 9x. On forward P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation wins at 1. 38x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) delivered a total return of +46.

6%, compared to +3. 9% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGC returned +155. 7% versus OCFC's +37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

89β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 0. 89β — meaning OCFC is approximately 1% more volatile than PGC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 98% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) is pulling ahead at 9.

5% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation grew EPS 14. 1% year-over-year, compared to -29. 1% for OceanFirst Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

(OCFC) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 8. 5% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OCFC leads at 14. 1% versus 11. 9% for PGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PGC leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 38x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGC: 5. 9% to $49. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 0. 4% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, OceanFirst Financial Corp.

(OCFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCFC: +37. 0%, PGC: +155. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. OCFC pays a dividend while PGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.