PGRE vs CUZ

For growth investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger pick with 16.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 0% for Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE). Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) offers the better valuation at 109. 5x trailing P/E (95. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) delivered a total return of -9.

6%, compared to -30. 5% for Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CUZ returned +25. 3% versus PGRE's -46. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paramount Group, Inc.

(PGRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Cousins Properties Incorporated's 0. 80β — meaning CUZ is approximately 157% more volatile than PGRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 92% for Paramount Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is pulling ahead at 16.

0% versus 2. 0% for Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Paramount Group, Inc. grew EPS 82. 5% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for Cousins Properties Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CUZ leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

1% net margin versus -6. 1% for Paramount Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CUZ leads at 22. 4% versus 19. 6% for PGRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PGRE leads at 60. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGRE: 81.

8% to $12. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) offers the highest yield at 4. 9%, versus 1. 6% for Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Paramount Group, Inc.

(PGRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGRE: -46. 2%, CUZ: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PGRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CUZ is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.