PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$113.93B
5Y Perf.+401.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PH vs ROK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$51.65B
5Y Perf.+112.5%
PH vs ROK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PH | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $113.93B | $51.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.99B | $8.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.48B | $1.09B |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 52.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.9% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | 29.1x | 37.8x |
| Total Debt | $9.64B | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $467M | $468M |
PH vs ROK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PH
ROK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parker-Hannifin Cor… (PH) | 100 | 501.6 | +401.6% |
| Rockwell Automation… (ROK) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PH vs ROK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PH leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Rockwell Automation, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
The Income Pick
PH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth -0.4%, EPS growth 24.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs ROK's 347.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
The Growth Leader
ROK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and momentum.
- 1.0% revenue growth vs PH's -0.4%
- +83.7% vs PH's +48.2%
Best for: growth and momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ROK | 1.0% revenue growth vs PH's -0.4% |
| Value | PH | Lower P/E (29.1x vs 37.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | PH | 16.6% margin vs ROK's 12.4% |
| Stability / Safety | PH | Beta 1.00 vs ROK's 1.33, lower leverage |
| Dividends | PH | 0.7% yield, 33-year raise streak, vs ROK's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ROK | +83.7% vs PH's +48.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PH | 11.5% ROA vs ROK's 9.7%, ROIC 13.4% vs 15.1% |
PH vs ROK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
PH vs ROK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPHLAGGINGROK
ROKRockwell Automation, …
1leads
PHParker-Hannifin Corpo…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ROKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PH6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ROK5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PH4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PH and ROK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PH is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.0B annually — 2.4x ROK's $8.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.6% (PH) to 12.4% (ROK).
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | ROKRockwell Automati… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21.0B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.1B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.5B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.7B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +52.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +39.6% |
Evenly matched — PH and ROK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.3x trailing earnings, PH trades at a 44% valuation discount to ROK's 59.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PH's 24.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ROK's 31.4x.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | ROKRockwell Automati… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113.9B | $51.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $123.1B | $54.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.28x | 59.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.11x | 37.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.78x | 31.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.74x | 6.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.58x | 14.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.10x | 38.03x |
PH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROK leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROK delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $24 for PH. PH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROK's 0.98x.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | ROKRockwell Automati… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.3% | +29.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.4% | +15.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.8% | +18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.2B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $467M | $468M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.6B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.39x | 9.06x |
ROK leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PH five years ago would be worth $29,479 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,015 for ROK. Over the past 12 months, ROK leads with a +83.7% total return vs PH's +48.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PH at 40.2% vs ROK's 19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | ROKRockwell Automati… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.2% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.2% | +83.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +175.4% | +68.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.8% | +80.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +741.1% | +347.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.2% | +19.1% |
PH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PH and ROK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PH is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROK's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs PH's 87.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | ROKRockwell Automati… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1034.96 | $463.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $608.31 | $250.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.2% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.9 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 710K | 836K |
Evenly matched — PH and ROK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PH and ROK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PH as "Buy" and ROK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for PH (target: $1042) vs -5.0% for ROK (target: $437). For income investors, ROK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.14% vs PH's 0.73%.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | ROKRockwell Automati… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1042.08 | $436.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 33 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.61 | $5.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — PH and ROK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). ROK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
Best OverallParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PH vs ROK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PH or ROK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rockwell Automation, Inc.
(ROK) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 4% for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) offers the better valuation at 33. 3x trailing P/E (29. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PH or ROK?
On trailing P/E, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the cheapest at 33.
3x versus Rockwell Automation, Inc. at 59. 9x. On forward P/E, Parker-Hannifin Corporation is actually cheaper at 29. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PH or ROK?
Over the past 5 years, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) delivered a total return of +194.
8%, compared to +80. 1% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PH returned +741. 1% versus ROK's +347. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PH or ROK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus Rockwell Automation, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning ROK is approximately 33% more volatile than PH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 98% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PH or ROK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rockwell Automation, Inc.
(ROK) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -0. 4% for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Parker-Hannifin Corporation grew EPS 24. 2% year-over-year, compared to -7. 4% for Rockwell Automation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PH leads at 7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PH or ROK?
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
8% net margin versus 10. 4% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PH leads at 20. 5% versus 17. 1% for ROK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROK leads at 48. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PH or ROK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) trades at 29.
1x forward P/E versus 37. 8x for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PH: 15. 4% to $1042. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — PH or ROK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 7% for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH).
09Is PH or ROK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
00), 0. 7% yield, +741. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PH: +741. 1%, ROK: +347. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PH and ROK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PH: 10.6% · ROK: 11.8%)Net Margin>
%
(PH: 16.6% · ROK: 12.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PH: 33.3x · ROK: 59.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.