PHI
PLDT Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$4.41B
5Y Perf.-16.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PHI vs SKM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$14.15B
5Y Perf.+93.2%
PHI vs SKM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PHI | SKM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $4.41B | $14.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $218.49B | $17.84T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30.02B | $1.01T |
| Gross Margin | 71.6% | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $359.04B | $10.76T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.86B | $2.02T |
PHI vs SKM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PHI
SKM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLDT Inc. (PHI) | 100 | 83.6 | -16.4% |
| SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM) | 100 | 193.2 | +93.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PHI vs SKM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PHI leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. SK Telecom Co.,Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PHI
PLDT Inc.
The Income Pick
PHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 7.8%
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth -5.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.44x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
The Long-Run Compounder
SKM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 239.6% 10Y total return vs PHI's 6.9%
- PEG 0.00 vs PHI's 0.03
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.03
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PHI | 3.0% revenue growth vs SKM's 1.9% |
| Value | SKM | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.03 |
| Quality / Margins | PHI | 13.7% margin vs SKM's 5.7% |
| Stability / Safety | PHI | Beta 0.21 vs SKM's 0.34 |
| Dividends | PHI | 7.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SKM's 3.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SKM | +72.3% vs PHI's -7.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PHI | 4.8% ROA vs SKM's 3.5%, ROIC 9.1% vs 6.0% |
PHI vs SKM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
PHI vs SKM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPHILAGGINGSKM
SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd
2leads
PHIPLDT Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SKMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PHI4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SKM4/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PHI6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SKM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
PHI1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.84T annually — 81.6x PHI's $218.5B. PHI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKM's 5.7%.
| Metric | PHIPLDT Inc. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $218.5B | $17.84T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $108.8B | $5.20T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30.0B | $1.01T |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35.7B | $3.07T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.6% | +90.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.3% | -75.7% |
PHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SKM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, PHI trades at a 47% valuation discount to SKM's 16.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PHI offers better value at 1.84x vs SKM's 2.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | PHIPLDT Inc. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $14.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.1B | $20.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.84x | 16.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.13x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.84x | 2.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.31x | 5.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.12x | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.34x | 8.15x |
SKM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PHI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PHI delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $8 for SKM. SKM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PHI's 2.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKM scores 7/9 vs PHI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PHIPLDT Inc. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.4% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.2% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.80x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $347.2B | $8.74T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.9B | $2.02T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $359.0B | $10.76T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.87x |
PHI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKM five years ago would be worth $20,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,113 for PHI. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +72.3% total return vs PHI's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKM at 24.9% vs PHI's 5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PHIPLDT Inc. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.9% | +79.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.2% | +72.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.6% | +95.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.1% | +102.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.9% | +239.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | +24.9% |
SKM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PHI and SKM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKM's 0.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKM currently trades 91.2% from its 52-week high vs PHI's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PHIPLDT Inc. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.51 | $40.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.61 | $19.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.3% | +91.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.7 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 136K | 1.7M |
Evenly matched — PHI and SKM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
PHI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PHI as "Hold" and SKM as "Hold". For income investors, PHI offers the higher dividend yield at 7.77% vs SKM's 3.95%.
| Metric | PHIPLDT Inc. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.8% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $97.25 | $2118.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
PHI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
PHI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SKM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallPLDT Inc. (PHI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PHI vs SKM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PHI or SKM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PLDT Inc. (PHI) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PHI or SKM?
On trailing P/E, PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the cheapest at 8. 8x versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd at 16. 8x. On forward P/E, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd wins at 0. 00x versus PLDT Inc. 's 0. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PHI or SKM?
Over the past 5 years, SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) delivered a total return of +102. 7%, compared to +11. 1% for PLDT Inc. (PHI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKM returned +239. 6% versus PHI's +6. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PHI or SKM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd's 0. 34β — meaning SKM is approximately 59% more volatile than PHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 3% for PLDT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PHI or SKM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus 1. 9% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd grew EPS 16. 3% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for PLDT Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PHI leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PHI or SKM?
PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 7% net margin versus 7. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHI leads at 24. 9% versus 9. 4% for SKM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKM leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PHI or SKM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus PLDT Inc. 's 0. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 1x for PLDT Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — PHI or SKM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the highest yield at 7. 8%, versus 3. 9% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM).
09Is PHI or SKM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 9% yield, +239. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKM: +239. 6%, PHI: +6. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PHI and SKM?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PHI: -1.2% · SKM: -1.9%)Net Margin>
%
(PHI: 13.7% · SKM: 5.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PHI: 8.8x · SKM: 16.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.