PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$2.97B
5Y Perf.+148.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PHIN vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+108.0%
PHIN vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PHIN | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.97B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.56B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $141M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 21.6% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.02B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $359M | $86.81B |
PHIN vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PHIN
AMZN
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) | 100 | 248.8 | +148.8% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 208.0 | +108.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PHIN vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PHIN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
The Income Pick
PHIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 64.3%, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 1.12, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.86x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Growth Play
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs PHIN's 119.6%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs PHIN's 2.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AMZN | 12.4% revenue growth vs PHIN's 2.4% |
| Value | PHIN | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 34.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs PHIN's 4.0% |
| Stability / Safety | PHIN | Beta 1.12 vs AMZN's 1.51 |
| Dividends | PHIN | 1.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PHIN | +94.3% vs AMZN's +43.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs PHIN's 3.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs 9.6% |
PHIN vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
PHIN vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGPHIN
PHINPHINIA Inc.
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PHINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMZN5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PHIN6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 208.4x PHIN's $3.6B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PHIN's 4.0%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PHINPHINIA Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $481M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $141M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $305M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.3% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.4% | +74.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PHIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.2x trailing earnings, PHIN trades at a 36% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PHIN's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.5x.
| Metric | PHINPHINIA Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.19x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.45x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.31x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.80x | 378.98x |
PHIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $9 for PHIN. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PHIN's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PHIN scores 7/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PHINPHINIA Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.6% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $661M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $359M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.37x | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PHIN and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PHIN five years ago would be worth $21,957 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,476 for AMZN. Over the past 12 months, PHIN leads with a +94.3% total return vs AMZN's +43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs PHIN's 30.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PHINPHINIA Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.7% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.3% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.0% | +36.8% |
Evenly matched — PHIN and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PHIN and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PHIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | PHINPHINIA Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.11 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.36 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.8 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 357K | 45.5M |
Evenly matched — PHIN and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PHIN as "Hold" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.1% upside for AMZN (target: $307) vs 7.8% for PHIN (target: $85). PHIN is the only dividend payer here at 1.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | PHINPHINIA Inc. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $84.50 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.05 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.8% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PHIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PHIN vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PHIN or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for PHINIA Inc. (PHIN). PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) offers the better valuation at 24. 2x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PHIN or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, PHINIA Inc.
(PHIN) is the cheapest at 24. 2x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, PHINIA Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PHIN or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, PHINIA Inc.
(PHIN) delivered a total return of +119. 6%, compared to +64. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus PHIN's +119. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PHIN or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PHINIA Inc.
(PHIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 35% more volatile than PHIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 64% for PHINIA Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PHIN or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 2. 4% for PHINIA Inc. (PHIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PHINIA Inc. grew EPS 84. 1% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PHIN or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 3. 7% for PHINIA Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 8. 0% for PHIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PHIN or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PHINIA Inc.
(PHIN) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 21. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 13. 1% to $306. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — PHIN or AMZN?
In this comparison, PHIN (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PHIN or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PHINIA Inc.
(PHIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 1. 3% yield, +119. 6% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHIN: +119. 6%, AMZN: +697. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PHIN and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PHIN pays a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PHIN: 10.3% · AMZN: 16.6%)Net Margin>
%
(PHIN: 4.0% · AMZN: 12.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PHIN: 24.2x · AMZN: 37.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.