Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PHOE vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs RCON

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PHOE
Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$381M
5Y Perf.+571.1%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-7.6%
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-56.8%
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-80.1%
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-56.5%

PHOE vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs RCON — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PHOE logoPHOE
CLPS logoCLPS
CNET logoCNET
AIXI logoAIXI
RCON logoRCON
IndustryConstructionInformation Technology ServicesAdvertising AgenciesSoftware - ApplicationOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$381M$25M$2M$8M$17M
Revenue (TTM)$7M$299M$6M$115M$66M
Net Income (TTM)$1M$-4M$-2M$-53M$-43M
Gross Margin29.5%22.8%4.8%64.3%23.0%
Operating Margin17.6%-1.4%-31.7%-44.2%-86.5%
Total Debt$25K$34M$122K$46M$34M
Cash & Equiv.$2M$28M$812K$847K$99M

PHOE vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs RCONLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PHOE
CLPS
CNET
AIXI
RCON
StockApr 25May 26Return
Phoenix Asia Holdin… (PHOE)100671.1+571.1%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10092.4-7.6%
ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET)10043.2-56.8%
Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI)10019.9-80.1%
Recon Technology, L… (RCON)10043.5-56.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PHOE vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs RCON

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PHOE leads in 4 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PHOE
Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
The Long-Run Compounder

PHOE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 422.2% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
  • 28.1% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
  • 13.9% margin vs RCON's -64.3%
  • +6.0% vs AIXI's -79.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Beta 0.27 vs CNET's 1.18
  • 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

CNET plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: communication services exposure
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation
The Growth Play

AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
Best for: growth exposure
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

RCON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
  • Beta 0.47, current ratio 5.88x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPHOE logoPHOE28.1% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
Quality / MarginsPHOE logoPHOE13.9% margin vs RCON's -64.3%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs CNET's 1.18
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PHOE logoPHOE+6.0% vs AIXI's -79.2%
Efficiency (ROA)PHOE logoPHOE22.6% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 119.6% vs -34.4%

PHOE vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs RCON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PHOEPhoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
CNETZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
FY 2024
Search Engine Marketing and Data Service
67.5%$10M
Online Advertising Placement
32.5%$5M
AIXIXiao-I Corporation
FY 2024
Technology Service
94.5%$24M
Hardware Products Member
5.5%$1M
RCONRecon Technology, Ltd.
FY 2025
Automation product and software
75.7%$29M
Oilfield environmental protection
22.6%$9M
Platform Outsourcing Services
1.7%$642,405

PHOE vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs RCON — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPHOELAGGINGRCON

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PHOE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 48.5x CNET's $6M. PHOE is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCON's -64.3%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPHOE logoPHOEPhoenix Asia Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7M$299M$6M$115M$66M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M-$2M-$49M-$54M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M-$2M-$53M-$43M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$2M-$2M-$44M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.5%+22.8%+4.8%+64.3%+23.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.6%-1.4%-31.7%-44.2%-86.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.9%-1.3%-33.4%-45.9%-64.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.5%-2.3%-27.3%-2.0%-65.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%-47.0%-64.9%+2.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+75.8%+95.7%-29.9%+35.7%
PHOE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CLPS and AIXI and RCON each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricPHOE logoPHOEPhoenix Asia Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…
Market CapShares × price$381M$25M$2M$8M$17M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$379M$31M$1M$53M$7M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.48x-0.38x-0.45x-1.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple280.32x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue51.72x0.15x0.12x0.11x1.72x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share122.57x0.43x0.38x0.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF334.57x
Evenly matched — CLPS and AIXI and RCON each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PHOE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

PHOE delivers a 42.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. PHOE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PHOE scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPHOE logoPHOEPhoenix Asia Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+42.6%-6.1%-60.3%-9.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+22.6%-3.2%-21.3%-65.3%-8.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+119.6%-7.9%-64.7%-34.4%-10.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+53.3%-9.8%-73.5%-3.4%-11.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–972544
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.59x0.03x0.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2M$6M-$690,000$45M-$64M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$28M$812,000$846,593$99M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$25,054$34M$122,000$46M$34M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1770.34x-14.13x-372.30x
PHOE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PHOE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PHOE five years ago would be worth $52,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $55 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, PHOE leads with a +600.7% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PHOE at 73.5% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPHOE logoPHOEPhoenix Asia Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.4%-10.3%-44.4%+68.1%-45.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+600.7%-5.4%-55.1%-79.2%-49.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+422.2%+0.5%-89.0%-98.6%-88.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+422.2%-69.3%-97.9%-98.6%-99.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+422.2%-78.5%-97.8%-98.6%-99.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+73.5%+0.2%-52.1%-75.9%-51.6%
PHOE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PHOE and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PHOE is the less volatile stock with a -0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNET's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPHOE logoPHOEPhoenix Asia Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.65x0.27x1.18x0.94x0.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$133.12$1.88$2.78$4.02$7.16
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.70$0.80$0.57$0.08$0.75
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+14.3%+48.2%+25.2%+18.0%+11.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.049.850.749.342.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded13K15K11K60.6M90K
Evenly matched — PHOE and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPHOE logoPHOEPhoenix Asia Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationRCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises301
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

PHOE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallPhoenix Asia Holdings Limit… (PHOE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PHOE vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs RCON: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PHOE or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or RCON a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (PHOE) is the stronger pick with 28.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — PHOE or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or RCON?

Over the past 5 years, Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (PHOE) delivered a total return of +422.

2%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PHOE returned +422. 2% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — PHOE or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or RCON?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (PHOE) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

65β versus ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning CNET is approximately -280% more volatile than PHOE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (PHOE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — PHOE or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or RCON?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (PHOE) is pulling ahead at 28.

1% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — PHOE or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or RCON?

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (PHOE) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

9% net margin versus -64. 3% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHOE leads at 17. 6% versus -86. 5% for RCON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — PHOE or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or RCON?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield) pays a dividend. PHOE, CNET, AIXI, RCON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is PHOE or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or RCON better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (PHOE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

65), +422. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHOE: +422. 2%, CNET: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between PHOE and CLPS and CNET and AIXI and RCON?

These companies operate in different sectors (PHOE (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services) and AIXI (Technology) and RCON (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PHOE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while PHOE, CNET, AIXI, RCON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PHOE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CNET

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AIXI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCON

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PHOE and CLPS and CNET and AIXI and RCON on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PHOE: 28.1% · CLPS: 15.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.