Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.61B | $7.18B | $2.23B | $7.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $361M | $829M | $481M | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $366M | $-56M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 52.3% | 83.4% | 25.7% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | 49.6% | -10.6% | -9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 80.4x | 38.8x | 89.2x | 80.4x |
| Total Debt | $327M | $506M | $359M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48M | $739M | $227M | $364M |
PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impinj, Inc. (PI) | 100 | 585.4 | +485.4% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 507.1 | +407.1% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 232.4 | +132.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs IDCC's 436.7%
IDCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 45.9%, current ratio 1.84x
- Lower P/E (38.8x vs 80.4x)
- 44.2% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
COHU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +199.7% vs IDCC's +32.4%
SLAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
- Beta 1.25, current ratio 4.69x
- 34.3% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (38.8x vs 80.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.2% margin vs COHU's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs COHU's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.7% vs IDCC's +32.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.7% ROA vs PI's -5.3%, ROIC 40.9% vs -0.1% |
PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDCC leads in 5 of 6 categories
PI leads 0 • COHU leads 0 • SLAB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $829M annually — 2.3x PI's $361M. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, COHU holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $361M | $829M | $481M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $489M | -$11M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $366M | -$56M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $580M | $32M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.3% | +83.4% | +25.7% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +49.6% | -10.6% | -9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | +44.2% | -11.5% | -8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +70.0% | +6.6% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.0% | -2.4% | +29.3% | +25.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.7% | -38.0% | +60.6% | +88.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IDCC's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PI's 341.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $7.2B | $2.2B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $6.9B | $2.4B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -409.00x | 23.62x | -29.86x | -109.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 80.43x | 38.81x | 89.21x | 80.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 341.74x | 12.91x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.77x | 8.61x | 4.93x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.18x | 8.73x | 2.82x | 6.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 100.45x | 13.58x | 207.83x | 109.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDCC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDCC delivers a 33.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PI. COHU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PI's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PI scores 6/9 vs COHU's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.9% | +33.4% | -6.8% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +17.7% | -4.9% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +40.9% | -5.7% | -6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +38.1% | -5.9% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 0.46x | 0.46x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $279M | -$233M | $132M | -$364M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48M | $739M | $227M | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $327M | $506M | $359M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.66x | 11.48x | -168.82x | -58.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,218 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, COHU leads with a +199.7% total return vs IDCC's +32.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDCC at 52.1% vs COHU's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.8% | -14.1% | +92.9% | +65.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.9% | +32.4% | +199.7% | +100.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.9% | +251.7% | +40.7% | +59.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.4% | +303.1% | +22.2% | +61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +742.1% | +436.7% | +330.2% | +375.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.9% | +52.1% | +12.1% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IDCC and SLAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDCC is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHU's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs PI's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.12x | 1.12x | 2.13x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $247.06 | $412.60 | $50.68 | $218.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $87.36 | $205.78 | $15.34 | $106.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +67.6% | +93.7% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.6 | 30.8 | 75.5 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 550K | 393K | 953K | 465K |
Analyst Outlook
IDCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PI as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs -2.8% for SLAB (target: $212). IDCC is the only dividend payer here at 0.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $180.00 | $425.00 | $49.75 | $211.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 16 | 14 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.76 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
IDCC leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (38. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Impinj, Inc. (PI) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?
On forward P/E, InterDigital, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 38. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PI returned +742. 1% versus COHU's +330. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Cohu, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning COHU is approximately 91% more volatile than IDCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 156% for Impinj, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silicon Laboratories Inc. grew EPS 66. 6% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for Impinj, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDCC leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IDCC leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) trades at 38. 8x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 50. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 5% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?
In this comparison, IDCC (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. PI, COHU, SLAB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 0. 6% yield, +436. 7% 10Y return). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDCC: +436. 7%, COHU: +330. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PI and IDCC and COHU and SLAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock. IDCC pays a dividend while PI, COHU, SLAB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.