Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PI
Impinj, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.61B
5Y Perf.+485.4%
IDCC
InterDigital, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.18B
5Y Perf.+407.1%
COHU
Cohu, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.23B
5Y Perf.+215.3%
SLAB
Silicon Laboratories Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.17B
5Y Perf.+132.4%

PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PI logoPI
IDCC logoIDCC
COHU logoCOHU
SLAB logoSLAB
IndustryCommunication EquipmentSoftware - ApplicationSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$4.61B$7.18B$2.23B$7.17B
Revenue (TTM)$361M$829M$481M$785M
Net Income (TTM)$-28M$366M$-56M$-65M
Gross Margin52.3%83.4%25.7%58.2%
Operating Margin-1.8%49.6%-10.6%-9.0%
Forward P/E80.4x38.8x89.2x80.4x
Total Debt$327M$506M$359M$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$48M$739M$227M$364M

PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLABLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PI
IDCC
COHU
SLAB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Impinj, Inc. (PI)100585.4+485.4%
InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC)100507.1+407.1%
Cohu, Inc. (COHU)100315.3+215.3%
Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB)100232.4+132.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IDCC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cohu, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. SLAB also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PI
Impinj, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

PI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.4% 10Y total return vs IDCC's 436.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
IDCC
InterDigital, Inc.
The Income Pick

IDCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 0.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 45.9%, current ratio 1.84x
  • Lower P/E (38.8x vs 80.4x)
  • 44.2% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

COHU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +199.7% vs IDCC's +32.4%
Best for: momentum
SLAB
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
The Growth Play

SLAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
  • Beta 1.25, current ratio 4.69x
  • 34.3% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSLAB logoSLAB34.3% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
ValueIDCC logoIDCCLower P/E (38.8x vs 80.4x)
Quality / MarginsIDCC logoIDCC44.2% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
Stability / SafetyIDCC logoIDCCBeta 1.12 vs COHU's 2.13
DividendsIDCC logoIDCC0.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)COHU logoCOHU+199.7% vs IDCC's +32.4%
Efficiency (ROA)IDCC logoIDCC17.7% ROA vs PI's -5.3%, ROIC 40.9% vs -0.1%

PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PIImpinj, Inc.
FY 2025
Endpoint I Cs
83.0%$300M
Systems
17.0%$61M
IDCCInterDigital, Inc.
FY 2025
Revenues
99.9%$834M
Revenue - Other
0.1%$529,000
COHUCohu, Inc.
FY 2014
Semiconductor Equipment
95.0%$317M
Microwave Communications Equipment
5.0%$17M
SLABSilicon Laboratories Inc.
FY 2024
Industrial & Commercial
100.0%$339M

PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIDCCLAGGINGSLAB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IDCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

IDCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $829M annually — 2.3x PI's $361M. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, COHU holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.IDCC logoIDCCInterDigital, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$361M$829M$481M$785M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9M$489M-$11M-$32M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$28M$366M-$56M-$65M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$61M$580M$32M$66M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.3%+83.4%+25.7%+58.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.8%+49.6%-10.6%-9.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.7%+44.2%-11.5%-8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.9%+70.0%+6.6%+8.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.0%-2.4%+29.3%+25.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-176.7%-38.0%+60.6%+88.8%
IDCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, IDCC's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PI's 341.7x.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.IDCC logoIDCCInterDigital, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…
Market CapShares × price$4.6B$7.2B$2.2B$7.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.9B$6.9B$2.4B$6.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-409.00x23.62x-29.86x-109.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.80.43x38.81x89.21x80.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.45x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple341.74x12.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue12.77x8.61x4.93x9.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share21.18x8.73x2.82x6.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF100.45x13.58x207.83x109.03x
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IDCC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

IDCC delivers a 33.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PI. COHU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PI's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PI scores 6/9 vs COHU's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.IDCC logoIDCCInterDigital, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.9%+33.4%-6.8%-5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.3%+17.7%-4.9%-5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.1%+40.9%-5.7%-6.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.3%+38.1%-5.9%-6.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96645
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.56x0.46x0.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$279M-$233M$132M-$364M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$48M$739M$227M$364M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$327M$506M$359M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-7.66x11.48x-168.82x-58.63x
IDCC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,218 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, COHU leads with a +199.7% total return vs IDCC's +32.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDCC at 52.1% vs COHU's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.IDCC logoIDCCInterDigital, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-15.8%-14.1%+92.9%+65.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+54.9%+32.4%+199.7%+100.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+59.9%+251.7%+40.7%+59.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+193.4%+303.1%+22.2%+61.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+742.1%+436.7%+330.2%+375.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.9%+52.1%+12.1%+16.7%
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IDCC and SLAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IDCC is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHU's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs PI's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.IDCC logoIDCCInterDigital, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.12x1.12x2.13x1.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$247.06$412.60$50.68$218.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$87.36$205.78$15.34$106.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.3%+67.6%+93.7%+99.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10077.630.875.566.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded550K393K953K465K
Evenly matched — IDCC and SLAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IDCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PI as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs -2.8% for SLAB (target: $212). IDCC is the only dividend payer here at 0.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.IDCC logoIDCCInterDigital, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$180.00$425.00$49.75$211.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts22161437
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises40
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.76
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%+0.3%0.0%
IDCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

IDCC leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallInterDigital, Inc. (IDCC)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PI vs IDCC vs COHU vs SLAB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.

(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (38. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Impinj, Inc. (PI) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?

On forward P/E, InterDigital, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 38. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?

Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.

(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PI returned +742. 1% versus COHU's +330. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), InterDigital, Inc.

(IDCC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Cohu, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning COHU is approximately 91% more volatile than IDCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 156% for Impinj, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.

(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silicon Laboratories Inc. grew EPS 66. 6% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for Impinj, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDCC leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?

InterDigital, Inc.

(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IDCC leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, InterDigital, Inc.

(IDCC) trades at 38. 8x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 50. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 5% to $425. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB?

In this comparison, IDCC (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. PI, COHU, SLAB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PI or IDCC or COHU or SLAB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, InterDigital, Inc.

(IDCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 0. 6% yield, +436. 7% 10Y return). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDCC: +436. 7%, COHU: +330. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PI and IDCC and COHU and SLAB?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock. IDCC pays a dividend while PI, COHU, SLAB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IDCC

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 26%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COHU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLAB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PI and IDCC and COHU and SLAB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PI: -0.0% · IDCC: -2.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.