Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PIII vs DBVT vs ALKS vs AGIO vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
PIII vs DBVT vs ALKS vs AGIO vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $10M | $1690.08T | $5.83B | $1.65B | $356.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.44B | $0.00 | $1.56B | $66M | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-131M | $-168M | $153M | $-423M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 48.2% | — | 65.4% | 82.1% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | — | 12.3% | -7.2% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.5x | — | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $166M | $22M | $70M | $62M | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $194M | $1.12B | $89M | $5.23B |
PIII vs DBVT vs ALKS vs AGIO vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| P3 Health Partners … (PIII) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 30.2 | -69.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 159.0 | +59.0% |
| Agios Pharmaceutica… (AGIO) | 100 | 49.8 | -50.2% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 180.8 | +80.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PIII vs DBVT vs ALKS vs AGIO vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PIII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.09 vs DBVT's 1.26
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.5% vs PIII's -58.5%
ALKS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs AGIO's -6.4%
- 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
AGIO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 48.0%, EPS growth -161.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 56.0%
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 11.46x
- 48.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 3.3%
- 293.8% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -12.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 3.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs AGIO's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.5% vs PIII's -58.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
PIII vs DBVT vs ALKS vs AGIO vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PIII vs DBVT vs ALKS vs AGIO vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories
PIII leads 1 • ALKS leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • AGIO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGIO's -6.4%. On growth, AGIO holds the edge at +137.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $0 | $1.6B | $66M | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$171M | -$112M | $212M | -$470M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$131M | -$168M | $153M | -$423M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$123M | -$151M | $392M | -$385M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | — | +65.4% | +82.1% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.6% | — | +12.3% | -7.2% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | — | +9.8% | -6.4% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | — | +25.1% | -5.8% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | — | +28.2% | +137.7% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.4% | +91.5% | -4.1% | -9.0% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PIII leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 71% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 14.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 17.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $1690.08T | $5.8B | $1.7B | $356.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $138M | $1690.08T | $4.8B | $1.6B | $420.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.07x | -0.75x | 24.47x | -3.90x | 85.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 14.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.01x | — | 14.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | — | 3.95x | 30.59x | 5.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.07x | 0.65x | 3.25x | 1.35x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.14x | — | 20.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PIII. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PIII's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs AGIO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.9% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -34.1% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.2% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -31.7% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -60.2% | — | +18.9% | -26.3% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -75.6% | -145.7% | +14.2% | -33.8% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $127M | -$172M | -$1.0B | -$27M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $194M | $1.1B | $89M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $166M | $22M | $70M | $62M | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.02x | -189.82x | 32.30x | — | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $19,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $73 for PIII. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs PIII's -58.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.4% vs PIII's -66.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | +3.6% | +23.8% | +2.2% | -10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.5% | +100.5% | +15.2% | -0.9% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +18.1% | +13.2% | +9.4% | +49.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -68.3% | +61.7% | -50.2% | +99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -87.1% | -12.0% | -41.7% | +293.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -66.7% | +5.7% | +4.2% | +3.0% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PIII and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PIII is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs PIII's 31.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | 1.26x | 1.00x | 1.10x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.30 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $46.00 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.52 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $22.24 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.4% | +75.3% | +95.6% | +60.4% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 47.4 | 60.5 | 44.6 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 252K | 2.2M | 1.0M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PIII as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", AGIO as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 252.3% upside for PIII (target: $13) vs 27.4% for ABBV (target: $257). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.50 | $46.33 | $46.00 | $37.75 | $256.69 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 15 | 28 | 29 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PIII leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PIII vs DBVT vs ALKS vs AGIO vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PIII or DBVT or ALKS or AGIO or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is the stronger pick with 48. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate P3 Health Partners Inc. (PIII) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PIII or DBVT or ALKS or AGIO or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 24.
5x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PIII or DBVT or ALKS or AGIO or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +99. 6%, compared to -99. 3% for P3 Health Partners Inc. (PIII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +293. 8% versus PIII's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PIII or DBVT or ALKS or AGIO or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), P3 Health Partners Inc.
(PIII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 1293% more volatile than PIII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 111% for P3 Health Partners Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PIII or DBVT or ALKS or AGIO or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is pulling ahead at 48. 0% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AbbVie Inc. grew EPS -0. 8% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGIO leads at 56. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PIII or DBVT or ALKS or AGIO or ABBV?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -764. 0% for Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -873. 9% for AGIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PIII leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PIII or DBVT or ALKS or AGIO or ABBV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PIII: 252.
3% to $12. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PIII or DBVT or ALKS or AGIO or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. PIII, DBVT, ALKS, AGIO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PIII or DBVT or ALKS or AGIO or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 3% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, DBVT: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PIII and DBVT and ALKS and AGIO and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PIII is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while PIII, DBVT, ALKS, AGIO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.