Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PIII vs OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs HUM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PIII
P3 Health Partners Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-99.3%
OSCR
Oscar Health, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.-6.2%
CLOV
Clover Health Investments, Corp.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.-68.3%
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.66B
5Y Perf.-32.4%
HUM
Humana Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$33.01B
5Y Perf.-38.2%

PIII vs OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs HUM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PIII logoPIII
OSCR logoOSCR
CLOV logoCLOV
ALHC logoALHC
HUM logoHUM
IndustryMedical - Care FacilitiesMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare Plans
Market Cap$10M$5.53B$1.62B$3.66B$33.01B
Revenue (TTM)$1.44B$13.30B$2.21B$4.26B$137.20B
Net Income (TTM)$-131M$-39M$-57M$20M$1.13B
Gross Margin48.2%17.4%18.2%9.0%14.0%
Operating Margin-17.6%0.1%-2.8%0.8%1.0%
Forward P/E26.7x88.1x101.8x30.8x
Total Debt$166M$430M$0.00$338M$12.94B
Cash & Equiv.$39M$2.77B$78M$578M$4.20B

PIII vs OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs HUMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PIII
OSCR
CLOV
ALHC
HUM
StockApr 21May 26Return
P3 Health Partners … (PIII)1000.7-99.3%
Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR)10093.8-6.2%
Clover Health Inves… (CLOV)10031.7-68.3%
Alignment Healthcar… (ALHC)10067.6-32.4%
Humana Inc. (HUM)10061.8-38.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PIII vs OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs HUM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HUM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Oscar Health, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. PIII and ALHC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PIII
P3 Health Partners Inc.
The Income Pick

PIII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • beta 0.09
  • Beta 0.09 vs OSCR's 1.83
Best for: income & stability
OSCR
Oscar Health, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

OSCR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (26.7x vs 101.8x)
  • +24.9% vs PIII's -58.5%
Best for: value and momentum
CLOV
Clover Health Investments, Corp.
The Insurance Play

Among these 5 stocks, CLOV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

ALHC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 46.1%, EPS growth 99.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.2%
  • Beta 0.81, current ratio 1.74x
  • 46.1% revenue growth vs HUM's 10.1%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
HUM
Humana Inc.
The Insurance Pick

HUM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 76.1% 10Y total return vs ALHC's 3.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 72.9%, current ratio 0.72x
  • 0.8% margin vs PIII's -9.1%
  • 1.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALHC logoALHC46.1% revenue growth vs HUM's 10.1%
ValueOSCR logoOSCRLower P/E (26.7x vs 101.8x)
Quality / MarginsHUM logoHUM0.8% margin vs PIII's -9.1%
Stability / SafetyPIII logoPIIIBeta 0.09 vs OSCR's 1.83
DividendsHUM logoHUM1.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OSCR logoOSCR+24.9% vs PIII's -58.5%
Efficiency (ROA)HUM logoHUM2.2% ROA vs PIII's -19.2%, ROIC 4.1% vs -60.2%

PIII vs OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs HUM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PIIIP3 Health Partners Inc.
FY 2024
Capitated Revenue
98.9%$1.5B
Health Care, Patient Service
1.1%$17M
OSCROscar Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CLOVClover Health Investments, Corp.
FY 2025
Insurance Segment
100.0%$50M
ALHCAlignment Healthcare, Inc.
FY 2023
Health Care, Premium
92.6%$1.7B
Health Care Capitation
7.4%$133M
HUMHumana Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Segment
84.7%$124.6B
CenterWell Segment
15.3%$22.5B

PIII vs OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs HUM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHUMLAGGINGALHC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HUM leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

HUM is the larger business by revenue, generating $137.2B annually — 95.0x PIII's $1.4B. HUM is the more profitable business, keeping 0.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PIII's -9.1%. On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +61.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPIII logoPIIIP3 Health Partner…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.4B$13.3B$2.2B$4.3B$137.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$171M$40M-$60M$66M$2.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$131M-$39M-$57M$20M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$123M$2.8B$55M$237M$1.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.2%+17.4%+18.2%+9.0%+14.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-17.6%+0.1%-2.8%+0.8%+1.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-9.1%-0.3%-2.6%+0.5%+0.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.5%+21.0%+2.5%+5.6%+0.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.7%+52.6%+61.0%+33.3%+23.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+38.4%+125.0%+2.1%-4.6%
HUM leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PIII and OSCR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, HUM's 18.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALHC's 75.7x.

MetricPIII logoPIIIP3 Health Partner…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
Market CapShares × price$10M$5.5B$1.6B$3.7B$33.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$138M$3.2B$1.5B$3.4B$41.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.07x-12.61x-18.35x-4845.95x27.94x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.68x88.14x101.82x30.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple75.68x18.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x0.47x0.84x0.93x0.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.07x5.70x5.23x19.80x1.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.22x32.37x88.03x
Evenly matched — PIII and OSCR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HUM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALHC delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PIII. OSCR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALHC's 1.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALHC scores 6/9 vs CLOV's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPIII logoPIIIP3 Health Partner…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.9%-3.3%-17.1%+11.5%+6.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-19.2%-0.6%-9.6%+1.8%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-60.2%-34.0%+4.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-75.6%-25.3%-24.5%+2.9%+4.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–924265
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.11x0.44x1.89x0.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$127M-$2.3B-$78M-$240M$8.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$39M$2.8B$78M$578M$4.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$166M$430M$0$338M$12.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.02x-0.57x1.27x3.08x
HUM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

OSCR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in OSCR five years ago would be worth $9,425 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $73 for PIII. Over the past 12 months, OSCR leads with a +24.9% total return vs PIII's -58.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLOV at 52.7% vs PIII's -66.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPIII logoPIIIP3 Health Partner…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.4%+42.4%+29.5%-11.3%+4.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-58.5%+24.9%-16.8%+16.3%+9.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%+183.4%+255.9%+148.0%-46.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%-5.7%-62.2%-16.6%-37.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%-38.8%-69.4%+3.6%+76.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-66.7%+41.5%+52.7%+35.4%-18.9%
OSCR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PIII and OSCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PIII is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSCR currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs PIII's 31.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPIII logoPIIIP3 Health Partner…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.09x1.83x1.26x0.81x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.30$23.80$3.92$23.87$315.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.52$10.69$1.58$11.63$163.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+31.4%+89.5%+79.6%+75.1%+87.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.581.673.838.176.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded62K6.5M5.7M3.6M1.6M
Evenly matched — PIII and OSCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PIII as "Buy", OSCR as "Hold", CLOV as "Hold", ALHC as "Buy", HUM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 252.3% upside for PIII (target: $13) vs -12.0% for OSCR (target: $19). HUM is the only dividend payer here at 1.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPIII logoPIIIP3 Health Partner…OSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.50$18.75$3.33$24.83$246.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts41191644
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.56
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.4%0.0%+0.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HUM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OSCR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallHumana Inc. (HUM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PIII vs OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs HUM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PIII or OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or HUM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

(ALHC) is the stronger pick with 46. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). Humana Inc. (HUM) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (30. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate P3 Health Partners Inc. (PIII) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PIII or OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or HUM?

On forward P/E, Oscar Health, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 26. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PIII or OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or HUM?

Over the past 5 years, Oscar Health, Inc.

(OSCR) delivered a total return of -5. 7%, compared to -99. 3% for P3 Health Partners Inc. (PIII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUM returned +76. 1% versus PIII's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PIII or OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or HUM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), P3 Health Partners Inc.

(PIII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning OSCR is approximately 1927% more volatile than PIII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 189% for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PIII or OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or HUM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

(ALHC) is pulling ahead at 46. 1% versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alignment Healthcare, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSCR leads at 41. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PIII or OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or HUM?

Humana Inc.

(HUM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -9. 1% for P3 Health Partners Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUM leads at 1. 1% versus -21. 4% for PIII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PIII leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PIII or OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or HUM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Oscar Health, Inc.

(OSCR) trades at 26. 7x forward P/E versus 101. 8x for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — 75. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PIII: 252. 3% to $12. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PIII or OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or HUM?

In this comparison, HUM (1.

3% yield) pays a dividend. PIII, OSCR, CLOV, ALHC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PIII or OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or HUM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Humana Inc.

(HUM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), 1. 3% yield). Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUM: +76. 1%, OSCR: -38. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PIII and OSCR and CLOV and ALHC and HUM?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PIII is a small-cap high-growth stock; OSCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HUM pays a dividend while PIII, OSCR, CLOV, ALHC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PIII

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OSCR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLOV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALHC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PIII and OSCR and CLOV and ALHC and HUM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PIII: -4.7% · OSCR: 52.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.