Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PINC vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
PINC vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $1712.35T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.00B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 72.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.0% | — |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $282M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $84M | $194M |
PINC vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Nov 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premier, Inc. (PINC) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 30.2 | -69.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PINC vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PINC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth -10.9%, EPS growth -78.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.9%
- -4.6% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -87.0%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.
- 0.3% margin vs PINC's -2.4%
- +110.4% vs PINC's +24.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -10.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs PINC's -2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs PINC's +24.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.8% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
PINC vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PINC vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PINC and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $118M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $265M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.0% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $1712.35T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $1712.35T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 128.45x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.79x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.35x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.70x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.33x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PINC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PINC delivers a -1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PINC's 0.18x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.6% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $198M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $84M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $282M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.13x | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINC five years ago would be worth $9,080 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs PINC's +24.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs PINC's 4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.0% | +110.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.8% | +19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.2% | -69.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.6% | -87.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.7% | +6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
PINC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PINC is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 76.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.79 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.62 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +76.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
PINC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PINC as "Hold" and DBVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs -0.0% for PINC (target: $28). PINC is the only dividend payer here at 2.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.25 | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +17.1% | 0.0% |
DBVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PINC leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
PINC vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PINC or DBVT a better buy right now?
Premier, Inc.
(PINC) offers the better valuation at 128. 5x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PINC or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, Premier, Inc.
(PINC) delivered a total return of -9. 2%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINC returned -4. 6% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PINC or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 1671% more volatile than PINC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 18% for Premier, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PINC or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Premier, Inc.
grew EPS -78. 8% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PINC or DBVT?
Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PINC leads at 0. 1% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PINC leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PINC or DBVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — PINC or DBVT?
In this comparison, PINC (3.
0% yield) pays a dividend. DBVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PINC or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PINC: -4. 6%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PINC and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PINC pays a dividend while DBVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.