Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $383M | $272M | $207M | $184M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $146M | $120M | $90M | $135M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $25M | $14M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 70.3% | 54.7% | 54.3% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 27.2% | 7.0% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 535.7x | 9.7x | 11.8x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $143M | $115M | $52M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $157M | $132M | $119M | $26M |
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) | 100 | 237.2 | +137.2% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PKBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 39.2%
- NIM 3.4% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
FUNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 361.3% 10Y total return vs PKBK's 286.6%
- PEG 0.74 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.32
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs FUNC's 0.67, lower leverage
MNSB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs FUNC's 0.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.1% vs MNSB's +37.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PKBK leads in 3 of 6 categories
FUNC leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PKBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PKBK is the larger business by revenue, generating $146M annually — 1.6x CZWI's $90M. PKBK is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $146M | $120M | $90M | $135M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $35M | $9M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $25M | $14M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $16M | $11M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.3% | +70.3% | +54.7% | +54.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +27.2% | +7.0% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +20.5% | +16.0% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +13.1% | +12.4% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +20.2% | +63.0% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PKBK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, PKBK trades at a 31% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 0.85x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $272M | $207M | $184M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $255M | $140M | $227M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.17x | 11.11x | 14.70x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 535.67x | 9.66x | 11.79x | 11.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.72x | 0.85x | 2.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.34x | 7.85x | 15.69x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 2.28x | 2.29x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 1.34x | 1.11x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 17.67x | 19.90x | 17.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PKBK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PKBK scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +12.6% | +7.8% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +7.1% | +2.0% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +9.8% | +0.6% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.56x | 0.28x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | -$17M | -$67M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $157M | $132M | $119M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143M | $115M | $52M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 0.99x | 0.16x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, PKBK leads with a +67.1% total return vs MNSB's +37.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.0% | +14.3% | +24.3% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.1% | +44.4% | +52.1% | +37.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +192.2% | +153.7% | +13.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | +141.9% | +69.0% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +286.6% | +361.3% | +149.0% | +135.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +43.0% | +36.4% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PKBK and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PKBK currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.67x | 0.50x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.24 | $42.35 | $22.62 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.78 | $28.00 | $12.83 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +98.9% | +94.9% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 71.6 | 51.2 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 13K | 41K | 45K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PKBK and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold". For income investors, PKBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.21% vs MNSB's 1.60%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.2% | +1.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $0.92 | $0.37 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +2.4% |
PKBK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FUNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (535. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 74x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +361. 3% versus MNSB's +135. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus First United Corporation's 0. 67β — meaning FUNC is approximately 34% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 56% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 9% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PKBK leads at 34. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 535. 7x for Parke Bancorp, Inc. — 526. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB).
09Is PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, MNSB: +135. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PKBK and FUNC and CZWI and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.