Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PKE vs HAYW vs TWIN vs HXL vs TPC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
Engineering & Construction
PKE vs HAYW vs TWIN vs HXL vs TPC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $666M | $3.20B | $266M | $7.22B | $4.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $66M | $1.15B | $348M | $1.93B | $5.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $161M | $22M | $118M | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 45.0% | 27.9% | 24.2% | 11.7% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | 21.3% | 3.3% | 9.5% | 4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 37.8x | 17.2x | 25.2x | 41.8x | 21.4x |
| Total Debt | $358K | $13M | $49M | $993M | $471M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $330M | $16M | $71M | $770M |
PKE vs HAYW vs TWIN vs HXL vs TPC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) | 100 | 252.7 | +152.7% |
| Hayward Holdings, I… (HAYW) | 100 | 87.5 | -12.5% |
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 192.6 | +92.6% |
| Hexcel Corporation (HXL) | 100 | 171.0 | +71.0% |
| Tutor Perini Corpor… (TPC) | 100 | 437.3 | +337.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PKE vs HAYW vs TWIN vs HXL vs TPC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PKE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 1.23, yield 1.5%, current ratio 9.75x
- 1.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HXL's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 7.3% ROA vs TPC's 2.5%, ROIC 7.3% vs 15.8%
HAYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.12 vs HXL's 1.43
- Lower P/E (17.2x vs 41.8x), PEG 0.12 vs 1.43
- 14.0% margin vs TPC's 2.2%
TWIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 29.9%, current ratio 1.96x
- Beta 1.04 vs TPC's 1.68, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, HXL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TPC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 28.1%, EPS growth 148.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 327.3% 10Y total return vs PKE's 209.5%
- 28.1% revenue growth vs HXL's -0.5%
- +251.2% vs HAYW's +7.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.1% revenue growth vs HXL's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.2x vs 41.8x), PEG 0.12 vs 1.43 | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.0% margin vs TPC's 2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs TPC's 1.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HXL's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +251.2% vs HAYW's +7.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs TPC's 2.5%, ROIC 7.3% vs 15.8% |
PKE vs HAYW vs TWIN vs HXL vs TPC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PKE vs HAYW vs TWIN vs HXL vs TPC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPC leads in 2 of 6 categories
HAYW leads 1 • PKE leads 0 • TWIN leads 0 • HXL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 86.1x PKE's $66M. HAYW is the more profitable business, keeping 14.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPC's 2.2%. On growth, PKE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $66M | $1.1B | $348M | $1.9B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $301M | $27M | $306M | $263M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $161M | $22M | $118M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $80M | -$70,000 | $251M | $721M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | +45.0% | +27.9% | +24.2% | +11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +21.3% | +3.3% | +9.5% | +4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +14.0% | +6.3% | +6.1% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +7.0% | -0.0% | +13.0% | +12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | +11.5% | +0.3% | +8.3% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.1% | +70.3% | +22.7% | +40.0% | -9.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HAYW and TWIN each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, HAYW trades at a 81% valuation discount to PKE's 115.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HAYW offers better value at 0.16x vs HXL's 2.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $666M | $3.2B | $266M | $7.2B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $644M | $2.9B | $299M | $8.1B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 115.21x | 21.71x | -131.50x | 69.91x | 54.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.75x | 17.19x | 25.22x | 41.76x | 21.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.16x | — | 2.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 57.30x | 9.81x | 12.05x | 27.72x | 14.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.73x | 2.85x | 0.78x | 3.81x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.30x | 2.06x | 1.55x | 6.13x | 3.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 173.91x | 14.19x | 30.10x | 23.51x | 7.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TPC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TWIN delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for PKE. PKE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HXL's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAYW scores 7/9 vs PKE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +10.3% | +13.2% | +8.4% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +5.2% | +6.1% | +4.3% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +10.2% | +3.9% | +6.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +8.6% | +4.5% | +7.2% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.30x | 0.79x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$316M | $33M | $922M | -$299M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $330M | $16M | $71M | $770M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $358,000 | $13M | $49M | $993M | $471M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.07x | 1.82x | 4.45x | 9.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPC five years ago would be worth $49,754 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,302 for HAYW. Over the past 12 months, TPC leads with a +251.2% total return vs HAYW's +7.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPC at 147.6% vs HAYW's 8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.3% | -6.4% | +13.9% | +25.0% | +19.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +157.7% | +7.3% | +156.5% | +90.9% | +251.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.4% | +27.3% | +55.3% | +33.8% | +1417.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.7% | -37.0% | +47.5% | +80.6% | +397.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.5% | -13.1% | +87.2% | +127.9% | +327.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.3% | +8.4% | +15.8% | +10.2% | +147.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TWIN and HXL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TWIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPC's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HXL currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs HAYW's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.14x | 1.04x | 1.05x | 1.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.86 | $17.73 | $19.63 | $98.26 | $99.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.07 | $13.04 | $6.80 | $50.40 | $22.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +83.3% | +93.8% | +97.5% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 51.5 | 58.3 | 65.1 | 74.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 248K | 2.2M | 49K | 1.2M | 575K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PKE and HXL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PKE as "Buy", HAYW as "Hold", TWIN as "Hold", HXL as "Hold", TPC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.7% upside for HAYW (target: $16) vs -68.0% for TPC (target: $27). For income investors, PKE offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs HXL's 0.70%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.75 | — | $90.25 | $26.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 | 4 | 36 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | +0.9% | +0.7% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | — | $0.16 | $0.67 | $0.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.2% | +0.5% | +6.3% | 0.0% |
TPC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HAYW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
PKE vs HAYW vs TWIN vs HXL vs TPC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PKE or HAYW or TWIN or HXL or TPC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) is the stronger pick with 28.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Hexcel Corporation (HXL). Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PKE or HAYW or TWIN or HXL or TPC?
On trailing P/E, Hayward Holdings, Inc.
(HAYW) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Park Aerospace Corp. at 115. 2x. On forward P/E, Hayward Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hayward Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Hexcel Corporation's 1. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PKE or HAYW or TWIN or HXL or TPC?
Over the past 5 years, Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) delivered a total return of +397.
5%, compared to -37. 0% for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPC returned +327. 3% versus HAYW's -13. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PKE or HAYW or TWIN or HXL or TPC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
04β versus Tutor Perini Corporation's 1. 68β — meaning TPC is approximately 60% more volatile than TWIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Hexcel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PKE or HAYW or TWIN or HXL or TPC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) is pulling ahead at 28.
1% versus -0. 5% for Hexcel Corporation (HXL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tutor Perini Corporation grew EPS 148. 2% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TPC leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PKE or HAYW or TWIN or HXL or TPC?
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
(HAYW) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAYW leads at 21. 1% versus 2. 9% for TWIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAYW leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PKE or HAYW or TWIN or HXL or TPC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Hexcel Corporation's 1. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 41. 8x for Hexcel Corporation — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAYW: 6. 7% to $15. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PKE or HAYW or TWIN or HXL or TPC?
In this comparison, PKE (1.
5% yield), TWIN (0. 9% yield), HXL (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. HAYW, TPC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PKE or HAYW or TWIN or HXL or TPC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hexcel Corporation (HXL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
05), 0. 7% yield, +127. 9% 10Y return). Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HXL: +127. 9%, TPC: +327. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PKE and HAYW and TWIN and HXL and TPC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAYW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPC is a small-cap high-growth stock. PKE, TWIN, HXL pay a dividend while HAYW, TPC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.