PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$444M
5Y Perf.+111.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PKOH vs GWW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Industrial - Distribution
Market Cap$58.41B
5Y Perf.+298.6%
PKOH vs GWW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PKOH | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $444M | $58.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.61B | $18.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $1.78B |
| Gross Margin | 12.6% | 39.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 14.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 28.3x |
| Total Debt | $670M | $3.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $585M |
PKOH vs GWW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PKOH
GWW
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Park-Ohio Holdings … (PKOH) | 100 | 211.4 | +111.4% |
| W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PKOH vs GWW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GWW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
The Value Play
PKOH is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 28.3x)
- 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GWW's 0.8%
- +60.8% vs GWW's +19.1%
Best for: value and dividends
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
The Income Pick
GWW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth -8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- 463.0% 10Y total return vs PKOH's 45.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GWW | 4.5% revenue growth vs PKOH's -3.4% |
| Value | PKOH | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 28.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | GWW | 9.7% margin vs PKOH's 1.5% |
| Stability / Safety | GWW | Beta 0.89 vs PKOH's 1.38, lower leverage |
| Dividends | PKOH | 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GWW's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PKOH | +60.8% vs GWW's +19.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GWW | 19.7% ROA vs PKOH's 1.7%, ROIC 32.1% vs 6.2% |
PKOH vs GWW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
PKOH vs GWW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPKOHLAGGINGGWW
GWWW.W. Grainger, Inc.
2leads
PKOHPark-Ohio Holdings Co…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GWWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GWW6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PKOH5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GWW7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PKOH4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GWW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GWW is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 11.4x PKOH's $1.6B. GWW is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PKOH's 1.5%. On growth, GWW holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PKOHPark-Ohio Holding… | GWWW.W. Grainger, In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $105M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +39.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | +18.2% |
GWW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PKOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, PKOH trades at a 48% valuation discount to GWW's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PKOH's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GWW's 20.7x.
| Metric | PKOHPark-Ohio Holding… | GWWW.W. Grainger, In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $444M | $58.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $61.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.14x | 34.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.96x | 28.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.33x | 20.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 3.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 14.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 222.03x | 43.88x |
PKOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GWW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GWW delivers a 43.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $6 for PKOH. GWW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PKOH's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GWW scores 8/9 vs PKOH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PKOHPark-Ohio Holding… | GWWW.W. Grainger, In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +43.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +19.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +39.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.74x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $626M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $585M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $670M | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.44x | 22.63x |
GWW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PKOH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GWW five years ago would be worth $27,320 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,792 for PKOH. Over the past 12 months, PKOH leads with a +60.8% total return vs GWW's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PKOH at 27.6% vs GWW's 22.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PKOHPark-Ohio Holding… | GWWW.W. Grainger, In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.5% | +23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.8% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.6% | +85.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.1% | +173.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.4% | +463.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.6% | +22.8% |
PKOH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PKOH and GWW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GWW is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PKOH's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | PKOHPark-Ohio Holding… | GWWW.W. Grainger, In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.68 | $1286.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.52 | $906.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +95.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.0 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 239K |
Evenly matched — PKOH and GWW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PKOH and GWW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PKOH as "Buy" and GWW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.0% upside for PKOH (target: $37) vs -6.2% for GWW (target: $1157). For income investors, PKOH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.81% vs GWW's 0.79%.
| Metric | PKOHPark-Ohio Holding… | GWWW.W. Grainger, In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $1157.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $9.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% |
Evenly matched — PKOH and GWW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GWW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PKOH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallPark-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PKOH vs GWW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PKOH or GWW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH). Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PKOH or GWW?
On trailing P/E, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
(PKOH) is the cheapest at 18. 1x versus W. W. Grainger, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PKOH or GWW?
Over the past 5 years, W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) delivered a total return of +173. 2%, compared to -12. 1% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GWW returned +463. 0% versus PKOH's +45. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PKOH or GWW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. 's 1. 38β — meaning PKOH is approximately 55% more volatile than GWW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, W. W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 174% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PKOH or GWW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus -3. 4% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: W. W. Grainger, Inc. grew EPS -8. 6% year-over-year, compared to -46. 7% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GWW leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PKOH or GWW?
W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 5% net margin versus 1. 5% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 9. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GWW leads at 15. 0% versus 5. 1% for PKOH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GWW leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PKOH or GWW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
(PKOH) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for W. W. Grainger, Inc. — 18. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PKOH: 20. 0% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PKOH or GWW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 8% for W. W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW).
09Is PKOH or GWW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 0. 8% yield, +463. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GWW: +463. 0%, PKOH: +45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PKOH and GWW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PKOH: 3.8% · GWW: 10.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PKOH: 18.1x · GWW: 34.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.