Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PLAG
Planet Green Holdings Corp.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveAMEX • US
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-91.8%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-51.6%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+112.5%
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$356K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+99.8%

PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PLAG logoPLAG
CLPS logoCLPS
CODA logoCODA
RETO logoRETO
PESI logoPESI
IndustryPackaged FoodsInformation Technology ServicesAerospace & DefenseConstruction MaterialsWaste Management
Market Cap$14M$25M$134M$356K$207M
Revenue (TTM)$4M$299M$28M$9M$59M
Net Income (TTM)$-17M$-4M$4M$-25M$-18M
Gross Margin6.3%22.8%66.3%14.0%4.1%
Operating Margin-206.6%-1.4%17.4%-237.8%-26.3%
Forward P/E22.5x
Total Debt$2M$34M$395K$110K$4M
Cash & Equiv.$194K$28M$29M$671K$12M

PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PLAG
CLPS
CODA
RETO
PESI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Planet Green Holdin… (PLAG)1008.2-91.8%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10048.4-51.6%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100212.5+112.5%
ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO)1000.0-100.0%
Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI)100199.8+99.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CODA leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. PLAG also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PLAG
Planet Green Holdings Corp.
The Value Play

PLAG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Beta 0.27 vs PESI's 1.85
  • 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
  • 8.4% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
  • Beta 1.00, current ratio 8.86x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

RETO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PESI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCODA logoCODA30.7% revenue growth vs PLAG's -61.9%
ValuePLAG logoPLAGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsCODA logoCODA14.8% margin vs PLAG's -430.8%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs PESI's 1.85
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CODA logoCODA+78.9% vs RETO's -95.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CODA logoCODA6.6% ROA vs PLAG's -138.8%, ROIC 11.2% vs -27.3%

PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PLAGPlanet Green Holdings Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912
RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
FY 2024
Technology Equipment
100.0%$652,906
PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Segments Total
50.0%$62M
Treatment
36.6%$45M
Services
13.4%$17M

PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGPESI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 75.5x PLAG's $4M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLAG's -4.3%. On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPLAG logoPLAGPlanet Green Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$299M$28M$9M$59M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M-$1M$6M-$19M-$14M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$17M-$4M$4M-$25M-$18M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$347M$0$7M-$7M-$14M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+6.3%+22.8%+66.3%+14.0%+4.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.1%-1.4%+17.4%-2.4%-26.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.3%-1.3%+14.8%-2.9%-30.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-87.6%-2.3%+24.6%-77.8%-23.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-57.4%+15.3%+28.8%+49.0%-20.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-193.8%+75.8%+3.0%+98.8%-110.5%
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PLAG and CLPS and RETO and PESI each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricPLAG logoPLAGPlanet Green Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…
Market CapShares × price$14M$25M$134M$355,799$207M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16M$31M$106M-$205,956$200M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.90x-3.48x32.16x-0.04x-14.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.08x0.15x5.05x0.19x3.36x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.20x0.43x2.30x0.01x4.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.18x22.20x
Evenly matched — PLAG and CLPS and RETO and PESI each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPLAG logoPLAGPlanet Green Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-47.1%-6.1%+7.2%-183.4%-34.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-138.8%-3.2%+6.6%-75.1%-20.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-27.3%-7.9%+11.2%-14.5%-21.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-42.2%-9.8%+8.1%-21.6%-16.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–962755
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.59x0.01x0.00x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M$6M-$28M-$561,755-$7M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$193,919$28M$29M$671,355$12M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$34M$394,932$109,600$4M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-94.47x-31.78x-42.14x
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs RETO's -95.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs RETO's -92.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPLAG logoPLAGPlanet Green Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.0%-10.3%+25.1%-66.1%-8.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+67.0%-5.4%+78.9%-95.9%+26.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.4%+0.5%+34.5%-99.9%+21.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.6%-69.3%+49.7%-100.0%+45.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%-78.5%+844.4%-100.0%+178.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.4%+0.2%+10.4%-92.0%+6.8%
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs RETO's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPLAG logoPLAGPlanet Green Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.36x0.27x1.00x1.77x1.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.49$1.88$17.28$19.55$16.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.47$0.80$5.98$0.48$8.02
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+42.8%+48.2%+68.9%+3.3%+67.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.149.848.643.541.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded104K15K256K920K164K
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", PESI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPLAG logoPLAGPlanet Green Hold…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts11
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0301
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -61. 9% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?

Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 579% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -61. 9% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.

1% to $18. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield) pays a dividend. PLAG, CODA, RETO, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between PLAG and CLPS and CODA and RETO and PESI?

These companies operate in different sectors (PLAG (Consumer Defensive) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PLAG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while PLAG, CODA, RETO, PESI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PLAG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RETO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PESI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PLAG and CLPS and CODA and RETO and PESI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PLAG: -57.4% · CLPS: 15.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.