Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Aerospace & Defense
Construction Materials
Waste Management
PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Information Technology Services | Aerospace & Defense | Construction Materials | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $14M | $25M | $134M | $356K | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $299M | $28M | $9M | $59M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-4M | $4M | $-25M | $-18M |
| Gross Margin | 6.3% | 22.8% | 66.3% | 14.0% | 4.1% |
| Operating Margin | -206.6% | -1.4% | 17.4% | -237.8% | -26.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 22.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $34M | $395K | $110K | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $194K | $28M | $29M | $671K | $12M |
PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdin… (PLAG) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
| ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLAG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Beta 0.27 vs PESI's 1.85
- 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
- Beta 1.00, current ratio 8.86x
RETO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PESI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs PLAG's -61.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs PLAG's -430.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs RETO's -95.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs PLAG's -138.8%, ROIC 11.2% vs -27.3% |
PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 1 • PLAG leads 0 • RETO leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 75.5x PLAG's $4M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLAG's -4.3%. On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $299M | $28M | $9M | $59M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$1M | $6M | -$19M | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$4M | $4M | -$25M | -$18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$347M | $0 | $7M | -$7M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +22.8% | +66.3% | +14.0% | +4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -1.4% | +17.4% | -2.4% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -1.3% | +14.8% | -2.9% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -87.6% | -2.3% | +24.6% | -77.8% | -23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.4% | +15.3% | +28.8% | +49.0% | -20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -193.8% | +75.8% | +3.0% | +98.8% | -110.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PLAG and CLPS and RETO and PESI each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $25M | $134M | $355,799 | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $31M | $106M | -$205,956 | $200M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.90x | -3.48x | 32.16x | -0.04x | -14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.45x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 7.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.85x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 0.15x | 5.05x | 0.19x | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 0.43x | 2.30x | 0.01x | 4.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.18x | — | 22.20x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.1% | -6.1% | +7.2% | -183.4% | -34.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.8% | -3.2% | +6.6% | -75.1% | -20.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.3% | -7.9% | +11.2% | -14.5% | -21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.2% | -9.8% | +8.1% | -21.6% | -16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.59x | 0.01x | 0.00x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $6M | -$28M | -$561,755 | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $193,919 | $28M | $29M | $671,355 | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $34M | $394,932 | $109,600 | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -94.47x | — | — | -31.78x | -42.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs RETO's -95.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs RETO's -92.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.0% | -10.3% | +25.1% | -66.1% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.0% | -5.4% | +78.9% | -95.9% | +26.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.4% | +0.5% | +34.5% | -99.9% | +21.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -69.3% | +49.7% | -100.0% | +45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -78.5% | +844.4% | -100.0% | +178.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.4% | +0.2% | +10.4% | -92.0% | +6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs RETO's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.27x | 1.00x | 1.77x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.49 | $1.88 | $17.28 | $19.55 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $0.80 | $5.98 | $0.48 | $8.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.8% | +48.2% | +68.9% | +3.3% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 49.8 | 48.6 | 43.5 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 104K | 15K | 256K | 920K | 164K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", PESI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 | — | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
PLAG vs CLPS vs CODA vs RETO vs PESI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -61. 9% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 579% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -61. 9% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.
1% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. PLAG, CODA, RETO, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PLAG or CLPS or CODA or RETO or PESI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PLAG and CLPS and CODA and RETO and PESI?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLAG (Consumer Defensive) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLAG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while PLAG, CODA, RETO, PESI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.