Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PLAG vs NRGV vs PLUG vs SPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Solar
PLAG vs NRGV vs PLUG vs SPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Renewable Utilities | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar |
| Market Cap | $13M | $784M | $4.34B | $925M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $217M | $710M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-115M | $-1.63B | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 6.3% | 22.1% | 99.8% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | -206.6% | -35.8% | 38.1% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 5.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $95M | $997M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $194K | $58M | $1M | $10M |
PLAG vs NRGV vs PLUG vs SPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdin… (PLAG) | 100 | 36.2 | -63.8% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 135.2 | +35.2% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 23.8 | -76.2% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 32.1 | -67.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLAG vs NRGV vs PLUG vs SPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLAG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 17.6%, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 1.53 vs NRGV's 2.97, lower leverage
NRGV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- -53.1% 10Y total return vs PLUG's 61.7%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs PLAG's -61.9%
- +475.7% vs SPWR's -37.7%
PLUG is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.55, current ratio 2.03x
SPWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.15
- -13.2% margin vs PLAG's -430.8%
- -19.5% ROA vs PLAG's -138.8%, ROIC -5.3% vs -27.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs PLAG's -61.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.2% margin vs PLAG's -430.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.53 vs NRGV's 2.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +475.7% vs SPWR's -37.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -19.5% ROA vs PLAG's -138.8%, ROIC -5.3% vs -27.3% |
PLAG vs NRGV vs PLUG vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLAG vs NRGV vs PLUG vs SPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLAG leads in 2 of 6 categories
PLUG leads 1 • NRGV leads 1 • SPWR leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUG is the larger business by revenue, generating $710M annually — 179.3x PLAG's $4M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -13.2% (SPWR) to -4.3% (PLAG). On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $217M | $710M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$72M | -$1.5B | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$115M | -$1.6B | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$347M | -$98M | -$2M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +22.1% | +99.8% | +50.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -35.8% | +38.1% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -53.0% | -2.3% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -87.6% | -45.2% | -0.3% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.4% | +156.4% | +17.6% | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -193.8% | -42.9% | +95.9% | -101.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PLAG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $784M | $4.3B | $925M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $820M | $5.3B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.80x | -6.97x | — | -16.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 5.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.97x | 3.85x | 6.12x | 3.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 8.21x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.39x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLAG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLAG delivers a -47.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-47 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. PLAG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLAG scores 6/9 vs NRGV's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.1% | -146.8% | -124.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.8% | -40.3% | -64.3% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.3% | -49.5% | +10.9% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.2% | -53.7% | +18.6% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 1.07x | 19.75x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $36M | $996M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $193,919 | $58M | $1M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $95M | $997M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -94.47x | -10.33x | -36.18x | -1.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRGV five years ago would be worth $4,637 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,071 for PLAG. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +475.7% total return vs SPWR's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 38.1% vs SPWR's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.2% | -7.4% | +39.9% | -33.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.9% | +475.7% | +266.9% | -37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.3% | +163.4% | -66.4% | -80.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | -53.6% | -84.5% | -80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -53.1% | +61.7% | -80.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.7% | +38.1% | -30.5% | -41.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PLAG and NRGV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLAG is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRGV's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRGV currently trades 71.3% from its 52-week high vs PLAG's 40.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 2.97x | 2.55x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.49 | $6.35 | $4.58 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $0.65 | $0.69 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.5% | +71.3% | +68.1% | +48.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 52.1 | 56.2 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 100K | 3.7M | 75.2M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRGV as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1350.5% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 25.3% for PLUG (target: $4).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | $3.91 | $15.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 38 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PLAG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PLUG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
PLAG vs NRGV vs PLUG vs SPWR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLAG or NRGV or PLUG or SPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -61. 9% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PLAG or NRGV or PLUG or SPWR?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) delivered a total return of -53. 6%, compared to -89. 3% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLUG returned +61. 7% versus PLAG's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PLAG or NRGV or PLUG or SPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Planet Green Holdings Corp.
(PLAG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning NRGV is approximately 94% more volatile than PLAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PLAG or NRGV or PLUG or SPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -61. 9% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SunPower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PLAG or NRGV or PLUG or SPWR?
SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 5% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -99. 0% for PLAG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PLAG or NRGV or PLUG or SPWR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1350.
5% to $15. 81.
07Which pays a better dividend — PLAG or NRGV or PLUG or SPWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PLAG or NRGV or PLUG or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Planet Green Holdings Corp.
(PLAG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLAG: -99. 4%, SPWR: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PLAG and NRGV and PLUG and SPWR?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLAG (Consumer Defensive) and NRGV (Utilities) and PLUG (Industrials) and SPWR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLAG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.