Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PLBC vs HAFC vs CVBF vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PLBC vs HAFC vs CVBF vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $398M | $949M | $2.88B | $2.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $444M | $644M | $1.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $76M | $209M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 57.4% | 79.7% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 35.4% | 24.3% | 43.7% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 10.0x | 14.7x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $280M | $991M | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $213M | $108M | $657M |
PLBC vs HAFC vs CVBF vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) | 100 | 255.9 | +155.9% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 327.0 | +227.0% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLBC vs HAFC vs CVBF vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 91.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 56.6%, current ratio 0.25x
- NIM 4.0% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
HAFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 22.4%
- PEG 0.79 vs CVBF's 4.64
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.79 vs 4.64
- +39.4% vs CVBF's +16.3%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.8% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8%
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.15x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLBC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.66 vs HAFC's 0.82
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.79 vs 4.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLBC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs HAFC's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs CVBF's +16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLBC's 0.4% |
PLBC vs HAFC vs CVBF vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLBC vs HAFC vs CVBF vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
HAFC leads 1 • PLBC leads 1 • WAFD leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 12.4x PLBC's $112M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAFC's 17.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $444M | $644M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $110M | $294M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $76M | $209M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $204M | $217M | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +57.4% | +79.7% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +24.3% | +43.7% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +17.1% | +32.5% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +45.8% | +33.7% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +20.7% | +11.1% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, PLBC trades at a 12% valuation discount to WAFD's 14.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HAFC offers better value at 1.00x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $398M | $949M | $2.9B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $466M | $1.0B | $3.8B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | 12.65x | 13.97x | 14.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.06x | 10.05x | 14.74x | 11.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.20x | 1.00x | 4.40x | 4.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.76x | 8.95x | 13.37x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.68x | 2.13x | 4.48x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.20x | 1.26x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.64x | 4.66x | 13.26x | 13.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLBC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLBC delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. HAFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +9.8% | +9.3% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.0% | +1.4% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +7.4% | +6.8% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +2.5% | +9.3% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.35x | 0.43x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $67M | $68M | $883M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $213M | $108M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $280M | $991M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.85x | 0.62x | 2.12x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PLBC and HAFC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLBC five years ago would be worth $21,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,522 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +39.4% total return vs CVBF's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 29.3% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.3% | +20.3% | +14.8% | +17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +39.4% | +16.3% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +116.0% | +64.4% | +37.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +80.5% | +15.2% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +574.9% | +73.3% | +66.9% | +91.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | +29.3% | +18.0% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAFC's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.82x | 0.81x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.00 | $31.87 | $21.48 | $37.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.70 | $22.00 | $17.95 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +99.6% | +98.8% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 62.5 | 60.1 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 203K | 1.6M | 525K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", HAFC as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs PLBC's 2.09%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $33.50 | $24.75 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 11 | 16 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +3.4% | +3.8% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $1.09 | $0.82 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +2.8% | +3.6% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HAFC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PLBC vs HAFC vs CVBF vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLBC or HAFC or CVBF or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLBC or HAFC or CVBF or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the cheapest at 12.
5x versus WaFd, Inc. at 14. 1x. On forward P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hanmi Financial Corporation wins at 0. 79x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or HAFC or CVBF or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) delivered a total return of +110.
2%, compared to +15. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLBC or HAFC or CVBF or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 82β — meaning HAFC is approximately 24% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLBC or HAFC or CVBF or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.
6% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hanmi Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 4% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for Plumas Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLBC or HAFC or CVBF or WAFD?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLBC or HAFC or CVBF or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or HAFC or CVBF or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 1% for Plumas Bancorp (PLBC).
09Is PLBC or HAFC or CVBF or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 2. 1% yield, +574. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLBC: +574. 9%, HAFC: +73. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLBC and HAFC and CVBF and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.