Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PLCE vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
PLCE vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $74M | $35M | $53M | $19.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.29B | $442M | $660M | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-52M | $-8M | $-10M | $610M |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | 44.4% | 32.2% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | -2.3% | -2.4% | 8.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 31.3x |
| Total Debt | $586M | $0.00 | $146M | $3.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $24M | $20M | $1.23B |
PLCE vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Children's Plac… (PLCE) | 100 | 8.1 | -91.9% |
| Destination XL Grou… (DXLG) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 146.2 | +46.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLCE vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLCE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 2.28
DXLG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
CATO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 89.9%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.88, yield 18.7%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.88 vs DXLG's 2.30
- 18.7% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
BURL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 440.2% 10Y total return vs CATO's -72.3%
- 8.9% revenue growth vs PLCE's -13.5%
- 5.3% margin vs PLCE's -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs PLCE's -13.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs PLCE's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs DXLG's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 18.7% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.5% vs PLCE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs PLCE's -6.7%, ROIC 10.3% vs 2.6% |
PLCE vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLCE vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BURL leads in 3 of 6 categories
PLCE leads 1 • DXLG leads 0 • CATO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BURL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BURL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 26.2x DXLG's $442M. BURL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLCE's -4.0%. On growth, BURL holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $442M | $660M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $5M | -$5M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$52M | -$8M | -$10M | $610M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | -$11M | -$7M | $232M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +44.4% | +32.2% | +41.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -2.3% | -2.4% | +8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -1.7% | -1.5% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | -2.6% | -1.1% | +2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.0% | -5.2% | +6.3% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.1% | -137.7% | +64.6% | +20.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PLCE and DXLG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PLCE's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BURL's 17.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74M | $35M | $53M | $19.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $655M | $11M | $178M | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.74x | -0.97x | -3.01x | 32.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 31.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.61x | — | — | 17.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.05x | 0.08x | 0.08x | 1.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.32x | 0.35x | 5.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.82x | — | 113.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BURL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BURL delivers a 29.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CATO. CATO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.90x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BURL's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BURL scores 7/9 vs CATO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -5.5% | -5.8% | +29.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.7% | -1.9% | -2.2% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | -6.8% | -6.7% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | -6.4% | -9.6% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.90x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $581M | -$24M | $126M | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $24M | $20M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $586M | $0 | $146M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.28x | — | -1.77x | 11.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BURL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BURL five years ago would be worth $9,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $416 for PLCE. Over the past 12 months, CATO leads with a +27.5% total return vs PLCE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BURL at 18.9% vs PLCE's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.6% | -28.9% | -2.7% | +2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.0% | -35.6% | +27.5% | +25.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.4% | -85.6% | -52.4% | +68.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | -55.2% | -60.4% | -7.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.3% | -88.1% | -72.3% | +440.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.9% | -47.6% | -21.9% | +18.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CATO and BURL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CATO is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DXLG's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BURL currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs PLCE's 35.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 2.30x | 0.88x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.56 | $1.69 | $4.92 | $351.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.76 | $0.43 | $2.26 | $218.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.1% | +37.9% | +59.3% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 58.2 | 48.6 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 362K | 144K | 60K | 721K |
Analyst Outlook
PLCE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CATO is the only dividend payer here at 18.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $331.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +18.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.55 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +39.2% | +7.4% | +1.4% |
BURL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PLCE leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
PLCE vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLCE or DXLG or CATO or BURL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (31. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PLCE or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
Over the past 5 years, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) delivered a total return of -7. 4%, compared to -95. 8% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +440. 2% versus DXLG's -88. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PLCE or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
88β versus Destination XL Group, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning DXLG is approximately 160% more volatile than CATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Cato Corporation (CATO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 90% versus 103% for Burlington Stores, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PLCE or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Children's Place, Inc. grew EPS 63. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1420. 0% for Destination XL Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BURL leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PLCE or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus -8. 3% for Destination XL Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BURL leads at 7. 3% versus -4. 2% for DXLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DXLG leads at 43. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PLCE or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
In this comparison, CATO (18.
7% yield) pays a dividend. PLCE, DXLG, BURL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is PLCE or DXLG or CATO or BURL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
88), 18. 7% yield). Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CATO: -72. 3%, DXLG: -88. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PLCE and DXLG and CATO and BURL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DXLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CATO pays a dividend while PLCE, DXLG, BURL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.