Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PLG vs SBSW vs PAL vs NEM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PLG
Platinum Group Metals Ltd.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$215M
5Y Perf.-7.9%
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • ZA
Market Cap$9.33B
5Y Perf.+160.2%
PAL
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$204M
5Y Perf.-52.1%
NEM
Newmont Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$125.72B
5Y Perf.+170.6%

PLG vs SBSW vs PAL vs NEM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PLG logoPLG
SBSW logoSBSW
PAL logoPAL
NEM logoNEM
IndustryOther Precious MetalsGoldIntegrated Freight & LogisticsGold
Market Cap$215M$9.33B$204M$125.72B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$238.26B$430M$17.23B
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$-12.39B$-33M$5.26B
Gross Margin21.2%7.9%52.1%
Operating Margin18.9%3.8%49.3%
Forward P/E0.2x21.4x10.9x
Total Debt$258K$44.34B$98M$474M
Cash & Equiv.$417K$17.16B$14M$7.65B

PLG vs SBSW vs PAL vs NEMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PLG
SBSW
PAL
NEM
StockMay 24May 26Return
Platinum Group Meta… (PLG)10092.1-7.9%
Sibanye Stillwater … (SBSW)100260.2+160.2%
Proficient Auto Log… (PAL)10047.9-52.1%
Newmont Corporation (NEM)100270.6+170.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PLG vs SBSW vs PAL vs NEM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NEM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sibanye Stillwater Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. PAL also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PLG
Platinum Group Metals Ltd.
The Secondary Option

PLG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
The Value Play

SBSW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (0.2x vs 21.4x)
  • +167.2% vs PAL's -9.6%
Best for: value and momentum
PAL
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock
The Growth Leader

PAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 78.7% revenue growth vs PLG's 6.1%
Best for: growth
NEM
Newmont Corporation
The Income Pick

NEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
  • Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 124.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
  • 293.1% 10Y total return vs SBSW's 30.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPAL logoPAL78.7% revenue growth vs PLG's 6.1%
ValueSBSW logoSBSWLower P/E (0.2x vs 21.4x)
Quality / MarginsNEM logoNEM30.5% margin vs PAL's -7.8%
Stability / SafetyNEM logoNEMBeta 0.75 vs PAL's 2.58, lower leverage
DividendsNEM logoNEM0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SBSW's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SBSW logoSBSW+167.2% vs PAL's -9.6%
Efficiency (ROA)NEM logoNEM9.4% ROA vs SBSW's -8.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs 22.9%

PLG vs SBSW vs PAL vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PLGPlatinum Group Metals Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

SBSWSibanye Stillwater Limited
FY 2024
Pgm Mining Activities
35.7%$59.5B
Gold Mining Activities
22.3%$37.1B
Platinum Mining Activities
12.3%$20.6B
Palladium Mining Activities
11.9%$19.9B
Rhodium Mining Activities
8.8%$14.7B
Chrome Mining Activities
3.6%$6.1B
Nickel Mining Activities
2.2%$3.6B
Other (3)
3.2%$5.3B
PALProficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock

Segment breakdown not available.

NEMNewmont Corporation
FY 2025
Gold Dore
63.2%$14.3B
Sales From Concentrate And Other Production
36.8%$8.3B

PLG vs SBSW vs PAL vs NEM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNEMLAGGINGSBSW

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBSW and PLG operate at a comparable scale, with $238.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. NEM is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAL's -7.8%. On growth, SBSW holds the edge at +25.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPLG logoPLGPlatinum Group Me…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…PAL logoPALProficient Auto L…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$238.3B$430M$17.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M$63.5B$56M$12.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M-$12.4B-$33M$5.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M-$9.5B$22M$12.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.2%+7.9%+52.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.9%+3.8%+49.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.2%-7.8%+30.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.0%+5.2%+75.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.4%+12.8%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.2%-10.0%-6.7%-100.0%
NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, PAL's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NEM's 9.0x.

MetricPLG logoPLGPlatinum Group Me…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…PAL logoPALProficient Auto L…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$215M$9.3B$204M$125.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$215M$11.0B$287M$118.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-40.47x-31.78x-6.07x17.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.25x21.44x10.89x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.67x5.16x9.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.27x0.47x5.69x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.09x3.47x0.64x3.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF90.73x17.22x
PAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NEM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

NEM delivers a 15.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-28 for SBSW. PLG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBSW's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs PAL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPLG logoPLGPlatinum Group Me…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…PAL logoPALProficient Auto L…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.7%-28.1%-10.1%+15.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.4%-8.3%-6.6%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.0%+22.9%+3.0%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.8%+19.1%+3.8%+20.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94629
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x1.00x0.31x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$159,000$27.2B$84M-$7.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$417,000$17.2B$14M$7.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$258,000$44.3B$98M$474M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.31x2.49x50.54x
NEM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NEM five years ago would be worth $17,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,432 for PLG. Over the past 12 months, SBSW leads with a +167.2% total return vs PAL's -9.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEM at 34.3% vs PAL's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPLG logoPLGPlatinum Group Me…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…PAL logoPALProficient Auto L…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-25.3%-6.5%-25.2%+12.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.5%+167.2%-9.6%+112.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.2%+40.9%-50.2%+142.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-65.7%-19.9%-50.2%+80.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.8%+30.7%-50.2%+293.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.4%+12.1%-20.8%+34.3%
NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAL's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEM currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs PLG's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPLG logoPLGPlatinum Group Me…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…PAL logoPALProficient Auto L…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.20x1.27x2.58x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.04$21.29$10.97$134.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.08$4.52$5.76$48.27
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+43.1%+62.0%+66.9%+84.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.857.054.853.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M5.7M298K9.2M
NEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NEM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SBSW as "Hold", PAL as "Buy", NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.5% upside for PAL (target: $12) vs 21.2% for NEM (target: $138). For income investors, NEM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.88% vs SBSW's 0.18%.

MetricPLG logoPLGPlatinum Group Me…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…PAL logoPALProficient Auto L…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.27$12.00$137.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts12436
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$1.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.8%
NEM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NEM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallNewmont Corporation (NEM)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PLG vs SBSW vs PAL vs NEM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PLG or SBSW or PAL or NEM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.

Common Stock (PAL) is the stronger pick with 78. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock (PAL) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PLG or SBSW or PAL or NEM?

On forward P/E, Sibanye Stillwater Limited is actually cheaper at 0.

2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PLG or SBSW or PAL or NEM?

Over the past 5 years, Newmont Corporation (NEM) delivered a total return of +80.

0%, compared to -65. 7% for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEM returned +293. 1% versus PLG's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PLG or SBSW or PAL or NEM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

75β versus Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 58β — meaning PAL is approximately 242% more volatile than NEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 100% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PLG or SBSW or PAL or NEM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.

Common Stock (PAL) is pulling ahead at 78. 7% versus 7. 1% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmont Corporation grew EPS 124. 1% year-over-year, compared to -157. 4% for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEM leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PLG or SBSW or PAL or NEM?

Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

1% net margin versus -7. 8% for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus 0. 0% for PLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEM leads at 49. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PLG or SBSW or PAL or NEM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) trades at 0.

2x forward P/E versus 21. 4x for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock — 21. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAL: 63. 5% to $12. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PLG or SBSW or PAL or NEM?

In this comparison, NEM (0.

9% yield), SBSW (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. PLG, PAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PLG or SBSW or PAL or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

75), 0. 9% yield, +293. 1% 10Y return). Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEM: +293. 1%, PLG: -93. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PLG and SBSW and PAL and NEM?

These companies operate in different sectors (PLG (Basic Materials) and SBSW (Basic Materials) and PAL (Industrials) and NEM (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SBSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NEM pays a dividend while PLG, SBSW, PAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PLG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBSW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PAL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NEM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.