Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PLSE vs INMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
PLSE vs INMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $884M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $350K | $375M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-73M | $87M |
| Gross Margin | -204.3% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | -219.8% | 21.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $303M |
PLSE vs INMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulse Biosciences, … (PLSE) | 100 | 209.9 | +109.9% |
| InMode Ltd. (INMD) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLSE vs INMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLSE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth -17.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.6%
- 357.6% 10Y total return vs INMD's 105.6%
- +13.2% vs INMD's -1.9%
INMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.00
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 9.88x
- Beta 1.00, current ratio 9.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -6.2% revenue growth vs PLSE's -36.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.3% margin vs PLSE's -207.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs PLSE's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.2% vs INMD's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs PLSE's -63.5%, ROIC 13.5% vs -8.8% |
PLSE vs INMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLSE vs INMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INMD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $375M annually — 1070.4x PLSE's $350,000. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLSE's -207.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $350,000 | $375M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$76M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$73M | $87M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$54M | $91M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -219.8% | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -207.9% | +23.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -155.5% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | -30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
INMD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $884M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $595M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.67x | 9.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3719.24x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.94x | 1.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INMD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INMD delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-73 for PLSE. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLSE's 0.09x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.5% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -63.5% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.8% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -73.1% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$73M | -$289M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $303M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLSE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLSE five years ago would be worth $11,698 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,850 for INMD. Over the past 12 months, PLSE leads with a +13.2% total return vs INMD's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLSE at 33.5% vs INMD's -26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.5% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.2% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.9% | -60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.0% | -61.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +357.6% | +105.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
INMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLSE's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INMD currently trades 83.4% from its 52-week high vs PLSE's 72.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.30 | $16.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.56 | $12.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.5% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 242K | 815K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PLSE as "Buy" and INMD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.2% upside for PLSE (target: $30) vs 21.8% for INMD (target: $17).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +14.4% |
INMD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PLSE leads in 1 (Total Returns).
PLSE vs INMD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLSE or INMD a better buy right now?
InMode Ltd.
(INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PLSE or INMD?
Over the past 5 years, Pulse Biosciences, Inc.
(PLSE) delivered a total return of +17. 0%, compared to -61. 5% for InMode Ltd. (INMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLSE returned +357. 6% versus INMD's +105. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PLSE or INMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Pulse Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning PLSE is approximately 91% more volatile than INMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 9% for Pulse Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PLSE or INMD?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pulse Biosciences, Inc.
grew EPS -17. 4% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for InMode Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INMD leads at -6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PLSE or INMD?
InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -207. 9% for Pulse Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INMD leads at 23. 0% versus -219. 8% for PLSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PLSE or INMD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLSE: 57.
2% to $30. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — PLSE or INMD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PLSE or INMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), +105. 6% 10Y return). Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INMD: +105. 6%, PLSE: +357. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PLSE and INMD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.