Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PLTR vs MDB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
PLTR vs MDB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $306.57B | $21.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.22B | $2.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.28B | $-71M |
| Gross Margin | 84.1% | 71.7% |
| Operating Margin | 38.1% | -5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 104.6x | 45.0x |
| Total Debt | $229M | $33M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.42B | $1.08B |
PLTR vs MDB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | 100 | 1408.3 | +1308.3% |
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | 100 | 114.6 | +14.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLTR vs MDB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLTR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 56.2%, EPS growth 231.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
- 13.1% 10Y total return vs MDB's 7.3%
- 56.2% revenue growth vs MDB's 22.8%
MDB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.67
- Lower volatility, beta 1.67, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 4.65x
- Beta 1.67, current ratio 4.65x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.2% revenue growth vs MDB's 22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (45.0x vs 104.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.7% margin vs MDB's -2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.67 vs PLTR's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.0% vs PLTR's +22.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.4% ROA vs MDB's -2.0%, ROIC 22.3% vs -4.9% |
PLTR vs MDB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLTR vs MDB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 2.1x MDB's $2.5B. PLTR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDB's -2.9%. On growth, PLTR holds the edge at +84.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | -$102M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.3B | -$71M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.7B | $510M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.1% | +71.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | -5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | -2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +51.5% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.7% | +26.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | -5.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MDB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $306.6B | $21.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $305.4B | $20.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 212.36x | -301.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 104.56x | 44.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 212.04x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 68.50x | 8.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 45.83x | 7.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 145.94x | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR delivers a 31.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MDB. MDB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLTR's 0.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLTR scores 8/9 vs MDB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.7% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +26.4% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.3% | -4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.6% | -4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.2B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $229M | $33M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -10.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLTR five years ago would be worth $66,594 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,337 for MDB. Over the past 12 months, MDB leads with a +54.0% total return vs PLTR's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLTR at 158.6% vs MDB's 2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.3% | -33.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +54.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1628.5% | +7.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +565.9% | +3.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1308.3% | +727.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +158.6% | +2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PLTR and MDB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDB is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLTR's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLTR currently trades 64.5% from its 52-week high vs MDB's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $207.52 | $444.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $105.32 | $169.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.5% | +59.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 46.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PLTR as "Hold" and MDB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for MDB (target: $413) vs 45.4% for PLTR (target: $195).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $194.53 | $413.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.9% |
PLTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PLTR vs MDB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLTR or MDB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger pick with 56. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 8% for MongoDB, Inc. (MDB). Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) offers the better valuation at 212. 4x trailing P/E (104. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLTR or MDB?
On forward P/E, MongoDB, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 45. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLTR or MDB?
Over the past 5 years, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) delivered a total return of +565. 9%, compared to +3. 4% for MongoDB, Inc. (MDB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLTR returned +1308% versus MDB's +727. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLTR or MDB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MongoDB, Inc.
(MDB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus Palantir Technologies Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning PLTR is approximately 14% more volatile than MDB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Palantir Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLTR or MDB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is pulling ahead at 56. 2% versus 22. 8% for MongoDB, Inc. (MDB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palantir Technologies Inc. grew EPS 231. 6% year-over-year, compared to 49. 1% for MongoDB, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLTR leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLTR or MDB?
Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 3% net margin versus -2. 9% for MongoDB, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLTR leads at 31. 6% versus -5. 6% for MDB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLTR leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLTR or MDB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MongoDB, Inc.
(MDB) trades at 45. 0x forward P/E versus 104. 6x for Palantir Technologies Inc. — 59. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDB: 55. 8% to $413. 36.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLTR or MDB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PLTR or MDB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1308% 10Y return). MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLTR: +1308%, MDB: +727. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLTR and MDB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.