Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PLUR vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
PLUR vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $209M | $1.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $-413M |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -18.7% | — |
| Total Debt | $34M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $155M |
PLUR vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pluri Inc. (PLUR) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLUR vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLUR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.06
- Rev growth 309.8%, EPS growth 10.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 78.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, current ratio 0.68x
NTLA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -37.3% 10Y total return vs PLUR's -97.5%
- +91.0% vs PLUR's -31.5%
- -49.0% ROA vs PLUR's -159.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 309.8% revenue growth vs NTLA's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs NTLA's 2.37 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.0% vs PLUR's -31.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -49.0% ROA vs PLUR's -159.3% |
PLUR vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLUR and NTLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUR and NTLA operate at a comparable scale, with $1M and $0 in trailing revenue. On growth, PLUR holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | -$332M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | -$413M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | -$355M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | -4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.0% | +36.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NTLA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $209M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $237M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.93x | -3.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 156.53x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTLA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTLA delivers a -61.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-61 in annual profit, vs $-10 for PLUR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTLA scores 3/9 vs PLUR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.9% | -61.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -159.3% | -49.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -107.1% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -44.17x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTLA five years ago would be worth $2,083 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,066 for PLUR. Over the past 12 months, NTLA leads with a +91.0% total return vs PLUR's -31.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLUR at -23.5% vs NTLA's -31.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | +50.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.5% | +91.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | -67.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | -79.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -37.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.5% | -31.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PLUR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLUR is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLUR currently trades 54.1% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 49.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.10 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.82 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.1% | +49.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 5.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 263.6% upside for PLUR (target: $12) vs 50.8% for NTLA (target: $21).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $20.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NTLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PLUR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
PLUR vs NTLA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLUR or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pluri Inc.
(PLUR) is the stronger pick with 309. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Analysts rate Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PLUR or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) delivered a total return of -79. 2%, compared to -89. 3% for Pluri Inc. (PLUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTLA returned -37. 3% versus PLUR's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PLUR or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pluri Inc.
(PLUR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 123% more volatile than PLUR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PLUR or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pluri Inc.
(PLUR) is pulling ahead at 309. 8% versus -100. 0% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to 10. 8% for Pluri Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PLUR or NTLA?
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1690. 3% for Pluri Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTLA leads at 0. 0% versus -1659. 9% for PLUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUR leads at 49. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PLUR or NTLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PLUR or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pluri Inc.
(PLUR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06)). Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLUR: -97. 5%, NTLA: -37. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PLUR and NTLA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.