Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PLX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PLX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $159M | $3.86B | $5.35B | $4.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53M | $1.10B | $827M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $376M | $-187M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 91.5% | 49.7% | 85.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.4% | 7.4% | -8.3% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 50.9x | 8.3x | 23.6x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $52M | $492M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $178M | $985M | $72M |
PLX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protalix BioTherape… (PLX) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 207.1 | +107.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 34.3% margin vs PTCT's -22.6%
- 26.2% ROA vs PLX's -8.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -11.6%
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs LGND's 73.0%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs PLX's -1.2%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 23.6x)
LGND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 8.93x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 8.93x
- Beta 0.99 vs PLX's 1.38, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs PLX's -1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 23.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs PTCT's -22.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs PLX's 1.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.1% vs PLX's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs PLX's -8.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -11.6% |
PLX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LGND leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACAD leads 1 • PLX leads 0 • PTCT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 20.8x PLX's $53M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTCT's -22.6%. On growth, LGND holds the edge at +122.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53M | $1.1B | $827M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $96M | -$37M | $52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $376M | -$187M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $212M | -$229M | $31M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +91.5% | +49.7% | +85.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +7.4% | -8.3% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.5% | +34.3% | -22.6% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | +19.4% | -27.7% | +12.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -49.9% | +9.7% | -76.8% | +122.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -180.5% | -81.8% | -100.3% | +15.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PLX and PTCT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 16% valuation discount to ACAD's 9.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 322.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $159M | $3.9B | $5.3B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $153M | $3.7B | $4.9B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.54x | 9.85x | 8.29x | -956.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.21x | 50.91x | — | 23.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.91x | 5.42x | 322.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.02x | 3.61x | 3.09x | 24.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.22x | 3.15x | — | 4.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 36.74x | 7.61x | 53.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACAD and PTCT and LGND each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-13 for PLX. LGND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLX's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs PLX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | +35.6% | — | +5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.3% | +26.2% | -6.8% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.6% | +10.0% | — | -2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.6% | +10.1% | +55.9% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.04x | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$126M | -$492M | -$65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $178M | $985M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $52M | $492M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.80x | — | -1.67x | 22.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth $16,102 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,513 for PLX. Over the past 12 months, LGND leads with a +99.1% total return vs PLX's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGND at 39.5% vs PLX's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.8% | -13.7% | -16.0% | +10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.3% | +52.4% | +58.2% | +99.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.9% | +4.7% | +16.1% | +171.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.9% | +7.1% | +60.3% | +61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.5% | -22.9% | +733.2% | +73.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.3% | +1.5% | +5.1% | +39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LGND leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGND is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLX's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LGND currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs PLX's 62.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.26x | 1.13x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.19 | $27.81 | $87.50 | $247.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $14.45 | $37.94 | $98.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.1% | +81.1% | +73.7% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 44.2 | 45.3 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 897K | 1.8M | 1.0M | 226K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", LGND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.1% upside for ACAD (target: $35) vs 27.3% for LGND (target: $268).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.78 | $89.67 | $267.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 37 | 26 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LGND leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). ACAD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
PLX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLX or ACAD or PTCT or LGND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (PLX). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (PLX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLX or ACAD or PTCT or LGND?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 9. 9x. On forward P/E, Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLX or ACAD or PTCT or LGND?
Over the past 5 years, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) delivered a total return of +61.
0%, compared to -34. 9% for Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (PLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus PLX's -75. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLX or ACAD or PTCT or LGND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning PLX is approximately 39% more volatile than LGND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 17% for Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLX or ACAD or PTCT or LGND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus -1. 2% for Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (PLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -329. 8% for Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLX or ACAD or PTCT or LGND?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -12. 5% for Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -13. 5% for LGND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLX or ACAD or PTCT or LGND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc.
(PLX) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 41. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACAD: 54. 1% to $34. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLX or ACAD or PTCT or LGND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PLX or ACAD or PTCT or LGND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), +733. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +733. 2%, PLX: -75. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLX and ACAD and PTCT and LGND?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; LGND is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.