Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PMEC vs ABM vs CTAS vs SERV vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Specialty Business Services
Industrial - Machinery
Staffing & Employment Services
PMEC vs ABM vs CTAS vs SERV vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Industrial - Machinery | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $28M | $2.36B | $67.28B | $541M | $355M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $123M | $8.87B | $10.79B | $5M | $3.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $158M | $1.90B | $-137M | $-266M |
| Gross Margin | 6.5% | 11.5% | 50.2% | -441.1% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | -8.8% | 3.7% | 23.0% | -28.8% | -2.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.2x | 34.1x | — | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $1.69B | $2.65B | $5M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $104M | $264M | $106M | $33M |
PMEC vs ABM vs CTAS vs SERV vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primech Holdings Lt… (PMEC) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
| ABM Industries Inco… (ABM) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
| Cintas Corporation (CTAS) | 100 | 97.2 | -2.8% |
| Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) | 100 | 170.3 | +70.3% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 39.4 | -60.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PMEC vs ABM vs CTAS vs SERV vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, PMEC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ABM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 2.6%
- PEG 0.04 vs CTAS's 2.04
- Better valuation composite
CTAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs SERV's 64.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 0.51, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.09x
- 17.6% margin vs SERV's -26.4%
SERV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 46.3%, EPS growth -52.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 190.8%
- 46.3% revenue growth vs KELYA's -1.9%
- +33.7% vs PMEC's -43.3%
KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ABM's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.3% revenue growth vs KELYA's -1.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs SERV's -26.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs SERV's 3.94 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ABM's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.7% vs PMEC's -43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.7% ROA vs SERV's -44.9%, ROIC 25.8% vs -64.9% |
PMEC vs ABM vs CTAS vs SERV vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PMEC vs ABM vs CTAS vs SERV vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTAS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SERV leads 1 • PMEC leads 0 • ABM leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 2078.1x SERV's $5M. CTAS is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SERV's -26.4%. On growth, SERV holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $123M | $8.9B | $10.8B | $5M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $431M | $2.9B | -$136M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $158M | $1.9B | -$137M | -$266M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $327M | $1.8B | -$148M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +11.5% | +50.2% | -4.4% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +3.7% | +23.0% | -28.8% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +1.8% | +17.6% | -26.4% | -8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +3.7% | +16.5% | -28.5% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.8% | +6.1% | +9.3% | +5.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.5% | -7.2% | +11.0% | -80.6% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ABM and KELYA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, ABM trades at a 59% valuation discount to CTAS's 37.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ABM offers better value at 0.05x vs CTAS's 2.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $2.4B | $67.3B | $541M | $355M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $3.9B | $69.7B | $440M | $481M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.71x | 15.52x | 37.95x | -5.38x | -1.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.15x | 34.12x | — | 11.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.05x | 2.27x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.01x | 9.16x | 24.41x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.27x | 6.51x | 203.95x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 1.41x | 14.62x | 1.56x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.40x | 15.19x | 38.29x | — | 3.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTAS delivers a 42.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-47 for SERV. SERV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PMEC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTAS scores 9/9 vs SERV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.7% | +8.8% | +42.6% | -47.3% | -24.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.8% | +3.0% | +18.7% | -44.9% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.1% | +7.5% | +25.8% | -64.9% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | +8.2% | +29.8% | -46.3% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 0.95x | 0.57x | 0.01x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $1.6B | $2.4B | -$101M | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $104M | $264M | $106M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $1.7B | $2.7B | $5M | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.35x | 3.25x | 24.61x | -22793.89x | -12.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SERV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTAS five years ago would be worth $19,239 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,269 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, SERV leads with a +33.7% total return vs PMEC's -43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SERV at 18.1% vs PMEC's -21.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.9% | -4.5% | -9.4% | -25.9% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.3% | -18.6% | -21.5% | +33.7% | -18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.4% | +2.0% | +49.1% | +64.8% | -33.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.4% | -14.5% | +92.4% | +64.8% | -57.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.4% | +47.0% | +671.6% | +64.8% | -32.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.4% | +0.7% | +14.2% | +18.1% | -12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABM and CTAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SERV's 3.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABM currently trades 75.9% from its 52-week high vs PMEC's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 0.71x | 0.51x | 3.94x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.44 | $52.94 | $229.24 | $18.64 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.52 | $36.96 | $165.46 | $6.11 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.5% | +75.9% | +72.8% | +47.0% | +66.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 55.8 | 39.5 | 47.8 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 680K | 513K | 2.1M | 3.7M | 364K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ABM and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABM as "Hold", CTAS as "Hold", SERV as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.2% upside for SERV (target: $16) vs 24.4% for ABM (target: $50). For income investors, KELYA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.18% vs CTAS's 0.89%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.00 | $223.40 | $16.33 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 30 | 20 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +0.9% | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 36 | 3 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.05 | $1.49 | — | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.2% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +3.5% |
CTAS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SERV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
PMEC vs ABM vs CTAS vs SERV vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PMEC or ABM or CTAS or SERV or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) is the stronger pick with 46. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PMEC or ABM or CTAS or SERV or KELYA?
On trailing P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus Cintas Corporation at 37. 9x. On forward P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated is actually cheaper at 10. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ABM Industries Incorporated wins at 0. 04x versus Cintas Corporation's 2. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PMEC or ABM or CTAS or SERV or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) delivered a total return of +92.
4%, compared to -57. 3% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTAS returned +671. 6% versus PMEC's -51. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PMEC or ABM or CTAS or SERV or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Serve Robotics Inc. 's 3. 94β — meaning SERV is approximately 675% more volatile than CTAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 105% for Primech Holdings Ltd. Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PMEC or ABM or CTAS or SERV or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) is pulling ahead at 46. 3% versus -1. 9% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ABM Industries Incorporated grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SERV leads at 190. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PMEC or ABM or CTAS or SERV or KELYA?
Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
5% net margin versus -38. 2% for Serve Robotics Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTAS leads at 22. 8% versus -42. 5% for SERV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTAS leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PMEC or ABM or CTAS or SERV or KELYA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Cintas Corporation's 2. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 34. 1x for Cintas Corporation — 24. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SERV: 86. 2% to $16. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PMEC or ABM or CTAS or SERV or KELYA?
In this comparison, KELYA (3.
2% yield), ABM (2. 6% yield), CTAS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PMEC, SERV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PMEC or ABM or CTAS or SERV or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 0. 9% yield, +671. 6% 10Y return). Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) carries a higher beta of 3. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTAS: +671. 6%, SERV: +64. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PMEC and ABM and CTAS and SERV and KELYA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PMEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CTAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SERV is a small-cap high-growth stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. ABM, CTAS, KELYA pay a dividend while PMEC, SERV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.