Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PMTS vs FORM vs IDCC vs COHU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Software - Application
Semiconductors
PMTS vs FORM vs IDCC vs COHU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Semiconductors | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $178M | $11.28B | $7.18B | $2.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $544M | $840M | $829M | $481M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $68M | $366M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 42.1% | 83.4% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 12.7% | 49.6% | -10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 66.5x | 38.8x | 89.2x |
| Total Debt | $337M | $45M | $506M | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $103M | $739M | $227M |
PMTS vs FORM vs IDCC vs COHU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) | 100 | 1117.3 | +1017.3% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 574.8 | +474.8% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 507.1 | +407.1% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PMTS vs FORM vs IDCC vs COHU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PMTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 13.1% NII/revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 89.2x)
FORM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 19.5% 10Y total return vs IDCC's 436.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.02, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 4.50x
- +387.8% vs PMTS's -23.0%
IDCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 0.6%
- Beta 1.12, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.84x
- 44.2% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
- Beta 1.12 vs COHU's 2.13
COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth -6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.1% NII/revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 89.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.2% margin vs COHU's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs COHU's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +387.8% vs PMTS's -23.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.7% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 40.9% vs -5.7% |
PMTS vs FORM vs IDCC vs COHU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PMTS vs FORM vs IDCC vs COHU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDCC leads in 3 of 6 categories
PMTS leads 1 • FORM leads 1 • COHU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FORM is the larger business by revenue, generating $840M annually — 1.7x COHU's $481M. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $544M | $840M | $829M | $481M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $152M | $489M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $68M | $366M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51M | -$5M | $580M | $32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | +42.1% | +83.4% | +25.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +12.7% | +49.6% | -10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +8.1% | +44.2% | -11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -0.6% | +70.0% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +32.0% | -2.4% | +29.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.5% | +2.2% | -38.0% | +60.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PMTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, PMTS trades at a 94% valuation discount to FORM's 209.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PMTS's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FORM's 100.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $11.3B | $7.2B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $494M | $11.2B | $6.9B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.42x | 209.68x | 23.62x | -29.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.60x | 66.48x | 38.81x | 89.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.39x | 100.94x | 12.91x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 14.37x | 8.61x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.94x | 8.73x | 2.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.31x | 960.69x | 13.58x | 207.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDCC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDCC delivers a 33.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. FORM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IDCC's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDCC scores 6/9 vs PMTS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.7% | +33.4% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +5.6% | +17.7% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.3% | +5.4% | +40.9% | -5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.5% | +6.1% | +38.1% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.46x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $316M | -$58M | -$233M | $132M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $103M | $739M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $337M | $45M | $506M | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.59x | 252.69x | 11.48x | -168.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,441 for PMTS. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +387.8% total return vs PMTS's -23.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FORM at 72.9% vs PMTS's -27.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.2% | +144.4% | -14.1% | +92.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.0% | +387.8% | +32.4% | +199.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.1% | +417.3% | +251.7% | +40.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.6% | +273.9% | +303.1% | +22.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.2% | +1952.2% | +436.7% | +330.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.6% | +72.9% | +52.1% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IDCC and COHU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDCC is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHU's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs PMTS's 60.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 2.02x | 1.12x | 2.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.50 | $159.09 | $412.60 | $50.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.81 | $26.08 | $205.78 | $15.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.9% | +90.9% | +67.6% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 66.5 | 30.8 | 75.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 1.6M | 393K | 953K |
Analyst Outlook
IDCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PMTS as "Buy", FORM as "Hold", IDCC as "Buy", COHU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.4% upside for PMTS (target: $28) vs -14.7% for FORM (target: $123). IDCC is the only dividend payer here at 0.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.33 | $123.38 | $425.00 | $49.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 19 | 16 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.76 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.4% | +0.3% |
IDCC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PMTS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PMTS vs FORM vs IDCC vs COHU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PMTS or FORM or IDCC or COHU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CPI Card Group Inc.
(PMTS) is the stronger pick with 13. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PMTS or FORM or IDCC or COHU?
On trailing P/E, CPI Card Group Inc.
(PMTS) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 209. 7x. On forward P/E, CPI Card Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PMTS or FORM or IDCC or COHU?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to -5. 6% for CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +1952% versus PMTS's -57. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PMTS or FORM or IDCC or COHU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Cohu, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning COHU is approximately 91% more volatile than IDCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 46% for InterDigital, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PMTS or FORM or IDCC or COHU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CPI Card Group Inc.
(PMTS) is pulling ahead at 13. 1% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InterDigital, Inc. grew EPS -2. 2% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for CPI Card Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDCC leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PMTS or FORM or IDCC or COHU?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IDCC leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PMTS or FORM or IDCC or COHU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CPI Card Group Inc.
(PMTS) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 82. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PMTS: 82. 4% to $28. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PMTS or FORM or IDCC or COHU?
In this comparison, IDCC (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. PMTS, FORM, COHU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PMTS or FORM or IDCC or COHU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 0. 6% yield, +436. 7% 10Y return). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDCC: +436. 7%, COHU: +330. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PMTS and FORM and IDCC and COHU?
These companies operate in different sectors (PMTS (Financial Services) and FORM (Technology) and IDCC (Technology) and COHU (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PMTS is a small-cap deep-value stock; FORM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IDCC pays a dividend while PMTS, FORM, COHU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.