Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PNBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Information Technology Services
Banks - Regional
PNBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Information Technology Services | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $114M | $207M | $896.00B | $20.26B | $444M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $90M | $280.33B | $11.66B | $208M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $14M | $57.05B | $2.67B | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 54.7% | 60.0% | 37.6% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | -19.1% | 7.0% | 25.9% | 17.9% | 23.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 11.8x | 14.4x | 6.2x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $52M | $942.38B | $4.01B | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $186M | $119M | $343.34B | $599M | $225M |
PNBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriot National Ba… (PNBK) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 349.9 | +249.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 14.4x)
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs PNBK's 1.46
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BWFG's 198.5%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- 22.9% margin vs PNBK's -19.2%
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 7.5% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -12.8%
BWFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth 261.8%
- PEG 0.24 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 2.9% vs PNBK's 1.7%
- 6.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs PNBK's -19.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs PNBK's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.3% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -12.8% |
PNBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PNBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • PNBK leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • BWFG leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4598.9x PNBK's $61M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNBK's -19.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $90M | $280.3B | $11.7B | $208M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $9M | $81.4B | $4.1B | $53M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $14M | $57.0B | $2.7B | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $11M | $100.9B | $2.8B | -$5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +54.7% | +60.0% | +37.6% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | +7.0% | +25.9% | +17.9% | +23.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +16.0% | +20.4% | +22.9% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | +12.4% | +36.0% | +23.9% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +30.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +63.0% | +16.0% | +30.6% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PNBK and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.29x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $207M | $896.0B | $20.3B | $444M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$56M | $140M | $1.50T | $23.7B | $398M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.06x | 14.70x | 16.00x | 52.27x | 12.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.68x | 11.79x | 14.40x | 6.24x | 10.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.90x | 0.90x | 2.14x | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.69x | 18.36x | 6.50x | 7.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 2.29x | 3.20x | 1.90x | 2.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.11x | 2.47x | 1.46x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.90x | 8.88x | 7.21x | 16.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PNBK. PNBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs PNBK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | +7.8% | +15.9% | +18.4% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +0.8% | +1.3% | +7.5% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.8% | +2.0% | +4.5% | +6.0% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.1% | +0.6% | +8.9% | +6.6% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.28x | 2.60x | 0.29x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | -$67M | $599.0B | $3.4B | -$45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $186M | $119M | $343.3B | $599M | $225M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $52M | $942.4B | $4.0B | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.42x | 0.16x | 0.74x | 21.16x | 0.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZWI and JPM and BWFG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,162 for PNBK. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +57.3% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs PNBK's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.9% | +24.3% | -0.5% | -38.9% | +24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +52.1% | +21.8% | -49.4% | +57.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +153.7% | +138.2% | -18.9% | +132.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +69.0% | +118.2% | -67.3% | +111.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +149.0% | +465.8% | -25.6% | +198.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.0% | +36.4% | +33.6% | -6.8% | +32.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNBK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.50x | 0.94x | 0.61x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $22.62 | $337.25 | $82.74 | $56.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $12.83 | $262.71 | $37.91 | $33.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.5% | +94.9% | +95.1% | +47.4% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 51.2 | 59.1 | 30.8 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 276K | 41K | 7.0M | 5.6M | 44K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs BWFG's 1.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $339.75 | $62.88 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 61 | 37 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +1.9% | +4.2% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $5.95 | $1.63 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +3.9% | +7.0% | +0.3% |
JPM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
PNBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the stronger pick with 6. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?
On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -88. 4% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PNBK's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning PNBK is approximately 194% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is pulling ahead at 6. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -21. 9% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -21. 8% for PNBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?
In this comparison, FIS (4.
2% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield), BWFG (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. PNBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PNBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, PNBK: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNBK and CZWI and JPM and FIS and BWFG?
These companies operate in different sectors (PNBK (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and BWFG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PNBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock. CZWI, JPM, FIS, BWFG pay a dividend while PNBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.