Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
POAI vs ACLX vs ILMN vs LEGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
POAI vs ACLX vs ILMN vs LEGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $27M | $6.73B | $21.07B | $5.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $728K | $22M | $4.39B | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $-229M | $853M | $-297M |
| Gross Margin | 50.2% | -64.8% | 67.1% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | -14.2% | -11.4% | 20.9% | -13.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 27.2x | 116.2x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $96M | $2.55B | $414M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $735K | $80M | $1.42B | $902M |
POAI vs ACLX vs ILMN vs LEGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predictive Oncology… (POAI) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX) | 100 | 599.9 | +499.9% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 38.8 | -61.2% |
| Legend Biotech Corp… (LEGN) | 100 | 45.7 | -54.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POAI vs ACLX vs ILMN vs LEGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
POAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACLX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs ILMN's 0.7%
- +117.4% vs POAI's -67.6%
ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (27.2x vs 116.2x)
- 19.4% margin vs POAI's -115.8%
- 13.4% ROA vs POAI's -26.9%, ROIC 16.8% vs -473.8%
LEGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.77
- Rev growth 64.5%, EPS growth -66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 1.96x
- Beta 0.77, current ratio 1.96x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.5% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.2x vs 116.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs POAI's -115.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs POAI's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.4% vs POAI's -67.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs POAI's -26.9%, ROIC 16.8% vs -473.8% |
POAI vs ACLX vs ILMN vs LEGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
POAI vs ACLX vs ILMN vs LEGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACLX leads 2 • POAI leads 0 • LEGN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 6030.0x POAI's $728,195. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POAI's -115.8%. On growth, LEGN holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $728,195 | $22M | $4.4B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$246M | $1.1B | -$107M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$84M | -$229M | $853M | -$297M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$213M | $989M | -$231M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.2% | -64.8% | +67.1% | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.2% | -11.4% | +20.9% | -13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -115.8% | -10.3% | +19.4% | -28.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.1% | -9.5% | +22.5% | -22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.0% | -89.2% | +4.8% | +64.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -220.6% | -13.6% | +6.1% | -2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $6.7B | $21.1B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $6.7B | $22.2B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.19x | -28.27x | 25.45x | -8.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 27.22x | 116.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 6.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 19.58x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.49x | 302.09x | 4.86x | 5.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.10x | 7.95x | 2.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-3 for POAI. ACLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILMN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs ACLX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | -55.4% | +32.8% | -29.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.9% | -36.2% | +13.4% | -17.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | -46.2% | +16.8% | -12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -184.7% | -46.6% | +17.6% | -11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.24x | 0.94x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $16M | $1.1B | -$488M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $734,673 | $80M | $1.4B | $902M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $96M | $2.6B | $414M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -8.45x | 12.09x | -12.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACLX five years ago would be worth $68,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $160 for POAI. Over the past 12 months, ACLX leads with a +117.4% total return vs POAI's -67.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACLX at 38.6% vs POAI's -55.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.7% | +81.7% | +3.2% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.6% | +117.4% | +81.7% | -9.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.9% | +166.2% | -27.1% | -58.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +584.9% | -62.8% | -0.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +584.9% | +0.7% | -22.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.0% | +38.6% | -10.0% | -25.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POAI's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLX currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs POAI's 15.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | -0.49x | 1.20x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.10 | $115.13 | $155.53 | $45.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.03 | $47.86 | $73.86 | $16.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.3% | +99.9% | +89.2% | +63.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 79.9 | 65.2 | 77.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 505K | 1.6M | 1.5M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACLX as "Hold", ILMN as "Buy", LEGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 102.6% upside for LEGN (target: $58) vs -2.3% for ACLX (target: $112).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $112.45 | $147.38 | $57.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 50 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.5% | 0.0% |
ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACLX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
POAI vs ACLX vs ILMN vs LEGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POAI or ACLX or ILMN or LEGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger pick with 64.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (27. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POAI or ACLX or ILMN or LEGN?
On forward P/E, Illumina, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 27. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POAI or ACLX or ILMN or LEGN?
Over the past 5 years, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) delivered a total return of +584. 9%, compared to -98. 4% for Predictive Oncology Inc. (POAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACLX returned +584. 9% versus POAI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POAI or ACLX or ILMN or LEGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 49β versus Predictive Oncology Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning POAI is approximately -425% more volatile than ACLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 94% for Illumina, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POAI or ACLX or ILMN or LEGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is pulling ahead at 64.
5% versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Arcellx, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEGN leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POAI or ACLX or ILMN or LEGN?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -1027. 3% for Arcellx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -1135. 6% for ACLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACLX leads at 70. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is POAI or ACLX or ILMN or LEGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) trades at 27. 2x forward P/E versus 116. 2x for Legend Biotech Corporation — 89. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LEGN: 102. 6% to $57. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — POAI or ACLX or ILMN or LEGN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is POAI or ACLX or ILMN or LEGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 49), +584. 9% 10Y return). Predictive Oncology Inc. (POAI) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLX: +584. 9%, POAI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between POAI and ACLX and ILMN and LEGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: POAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LEGN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.