Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
POCI vs DBVT vs VIAV vs ALKS vs LITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Communication Equipment
Biotechnology
Communication Equipment
POCI vs DBVT vs VIAV vs ALKS vs LITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Communication Equipment | Biotechnology | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $35M | $1690.08T | $11.85B | $5.83B | $64.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $0.00 | $1.37B | $1.56B | $2.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-168M | $-55M | $153M | $440M |
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | — | 55.7% | 65.4% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | -27.3% | — | 8.2% | 12.3% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 54.7x | 24.5x | 110.1x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $22M | $692M | $70M | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $194M | $424M | $1.12B | $521M |
POCI vs DBVT vs VIAV vs ALKS vs LITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision Optics Co… (POCI) | 100 | 109.3 | +9.3% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 441.8 | +341.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1232.2 | +1132.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POCI vs DBVT vs VIAV vs ALKS vs LITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
POCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 0.42 vs LITE's 2.66, lower leverage
DBVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
VIAV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.65
ALKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Lower P/E (24.5x vs 110.1x)
LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth 104.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
- 36.8% 10Y total return vs VIAV's 7.2%
- 21.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- 17.7% margin vs POCI's -28.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.5x vs 110.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs POCI's -28.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs LITE's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs POCI's -1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
POCI vs DBVT vs VIAV vs ALKS vs LITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
POCI vs DBVT vs VIAV vs ALKS vs LITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 1 of 6 categories
LITE leads 1 • VIAV leads 1 • POCI leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ALKS and LITE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $2.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POCI's -28.3%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $0 | $1.4B | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$112M | $207M | $212M | $425M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$168M | -$55M | $153M | $440M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$151M | $46M | $392M | $399M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | — | +55.7% | +65.4% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.3% | — | +8.2% | +12.3% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.3% | — | -4.0% | +9.8% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | — | +3.3% | +25.1% | +16.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.2% | — | +42.8% | +28.2% | +90.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +91.5% | -70.2% | -4.1% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — POCI and ALKS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 99% valuation discount to LITE's 2441.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALKS's 17.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 869.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $1690.08T | $11.8B | $5.8B | $64.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $36M | $1690.08T | $12.1B | $4.8B | $66.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.40x | -0.75x | 341.40x | 24.47x | 2441.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 54.72x | — | 110.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 74.80x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 90.70x | 17.01x | 869.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | — | 10.93x | 3.95x | 39.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.54x | 0.65x | 14.81x | 3.25x | 55.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 191.12x | 12.14x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs POCI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.9% | -130.2% | -6.9% | +8.8% | +30.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.3% | -89.0% | -2.3% | +5.4% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.5% | — | +5.5% | +18.9% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -43.3% | -145.7% | +4.9% | +14.2% | -4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.13x | 0.89x | 0.04x | 2.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $262,685 | -$172M | $269M | -$1.0B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $194M | $424M | $1.1B | $521M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $22M | $692M | $70M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -28.85x | -189.82x | 2.70x | 32.30x | 9.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $111,852 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,172 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1275.9% total return vs POCI's -1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 166.2% vs POCI's -8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.0% | +3.6% | +182.1% | +23.8% | +134.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.1% | +100.5% | +458.5% | +15.2% | +1275.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.4% | +18.1% | +462.7% | +13.2% | +1786.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.0% | -68.3% | +216.5% | +61.7% | +1018.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.0% | -87.1% | +718.1% | -12.0% | +3680.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.9% | +5.7% | +77.9% | +4.2% | +166.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POCI and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
POCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LITE's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 75.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 1.26x | 1.65x | 1.00x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.04 | $26.18 | $60.43 | $36.60 | $1021.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.55 | $7.53 | $8.87 | $25.17 | $63.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.0% | +75.3% | +84.7% | +95.6% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 47.4 | 62.0 | 60.5 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 252K | 6.3M | 2.2M | 6.5M |
Analyst Outlook
VIAV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", VIAV as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", LITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs -37.0% for VIAV (target: $32).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $32.25 | $46.00 | $918.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 19 | 28 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.5% | +0.1% |
ALKS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). LITE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
POCI vs DBVT vs VIAV vs ALKS vs LITE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POCI or DBVT or VIAV or ALKS or LITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the stronger pick with 21. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POCI or DBVT or VIAV or ALKS or LITE?
On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 24.
5x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2441. 7x. On forward P/E, Viavi Solutions Inc. is actually cheaper at 54. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POCI or DBVT or VIAV or ALKS or LITE?
Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) delivered a total return of +1019%, compared to -68. 3% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 8% versus DBVT's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POCI or DBVT or VIAV or ALKS or LITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.
(POCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning LITE is approximately 531% more volatile than POCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POCI or DBVT or VIAV or ALKS or LITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is pulling ahead at 21. 0% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POCI or DBVT or VIAV or ALKS or LITE?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -30. 3% for Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -29. 1% for POCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is POCI or DBVT or VIAV or ALKS or LITE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) trades at 54. 7x forward P/E versus 110. 1x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 55. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 134. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — POCI or DBVT or VIAV or ALKS or LITE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is POCI or DBVT or VIAV or ALKS or LITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.
(POCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), +240. 0% 10Y return). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (POCI: +240. 0%, LITE: +36. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between POCI and DBVT and VIAV and ALKS and LITE?
These companies operate in different sectors (POCI (Healthcare) and DBVT (Healthcare) and VIAV (Technology) and ALKS (Healthcare) and LITE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: POCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.