Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PODC vs AMWL vs TDOC vs IHRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Broadcasting
PODC vs AMWL vs TDOC vs IHRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $67M | $129M | $1.26B | $880M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $182M | $2.51B | $3.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-88M | $-171M | $-473M |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 38.7% | 65.6% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | -50.6% | -7.6% | -0.5% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $5M | $1.04B | $5.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $182M | $781M | $271K |
PODC vs AMWL vs TDOC vs IHRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PodcastOne, Inc. (PODC) | 100 | 178.3 | +78.3% |
| American Well Corpo… (AMWL) | 100 | 33.1 | -66.9% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 37.4 | -62.6% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 179.4 | +79.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PODC vs AMWL vs TDOC vs IHRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PODC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.87
- Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 61.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.2%
- -19.6% 10Y total return vs TDOC's -41.1%
- 20.4% revenue growth vs AMWL's -2.0%
AMWL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.37x
- Beta 1.47, current ratio 3.37x
TDOC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- -5.9% ROA vs AMWL's -25.1%, ROIC -11.5% vs -95.1%
IHRT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +415.5% vs TDOC's +1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.4% revenue growth vs AMWL's -2.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.7% margin vs AMWL's -48.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs TDOC's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs TDOC's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.9% ROA vs AMWL's -25.1%, ROIC -11.5% vs -95.1% |
PODC vs AMWL vs TDOC vs IHRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PODC vs AMWL vs TDOC vs IHRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PODC leads in 2 of 6 categories
TDOC leads 1 • IHRT leads 1 • AMWL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PODC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IHRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 64.3x PODC's $60M. PODC is the more profitable business, keeping -6.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMWL's -48.2%. On growth, PODC holds the edge at +24.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $182M | $2.5B | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$59M | $42M | $339M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$88M | -$171M | -$473M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$42M | $251M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +38.7% | +65.6% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -50.6% | -7.6% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -48.2% | -6.8% | -12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -22.9% | +10.0% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.8% | -100.0% | -2.5% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.5% | +44.5% | +32.1% | -20.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TDOC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TDOC's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IHRT's 19.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67M | $129M | $1.3B | $880M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | -$48M | $1.5B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.58x | -1.30x | -6.11x | -1.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 15.13x | 19.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 0.52x | 0.50x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.63x | 0.50x | 0.89x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 4.40x | 80.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AMWL and TDOC and IHRT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TDOC delivers a -12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-33 for AMWL. AMWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TDOC's 0.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMWL scores 6/9 vs IHRT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.5% | -33.5% | -12.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.3% | -25.1% | -5.9% | -12.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.3% | -95.1% | -11.5% | -0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.8% | -36.6% | -10.0% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 0.75x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$178M | $259M | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $182M | $781M | $270,900 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $5M | $1.0B | $5.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -239.18x | -8.76x | -0.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IHRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PODC five years ago would be worth $8,041 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $278 for AMWL. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs TDOC's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IHRT at 23.0% vs AMWL's -42.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.2% | +59.8% | -1.3% | +36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.0% | +14.3% | +1.5% | +415.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | -80.7% | -73.3% | +85.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | -97.2% | -95.4% | -75.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | -98.3% | -41.1% | -68.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.0% | -42.2% | -35.6% | +23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
PODC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PODC is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TDOC's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PODC currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs TDOC's 71.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.47x | 1.91x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.90 | $9.15 | $9.77 | $6.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $3.71 | $4.40 | $1.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +84.7% | +71.2% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.8 | 67.1 | 74.1 | 68.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 59K | 5.5M | 986K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TDOC as "Hold", IHRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.9% upside for TDOC (target: $8) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). IHRT is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $7.58 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 42 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PODC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). TDOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PODC vs AMWL vs TDOC vs IHRT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PODC or AMWL or TDOC or IHRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PodcastOne, Inc.
(PODC) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). Analysts rate iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PODC or AMWL or TDOC or IHRT?
Over the past 5 years, PodcastOne, Inc.
(PODC) delivered a total return of -19. 6%, compared to -97. 2% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PODC returned -19. 6% versus AMWL's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PODC or AMWL or TDOC or IHRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PodcastOne, Inc.
(PODC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Teladoc Health, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning TDOC is approximately 119% more volatile than PODC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Well Corporation (AMWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 75% for Teladoc Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PODC or AMWL or TDOC or IHRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PodcastOne, Inc.
(PODC) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teladoc Health, Inc. grew EPS 80. 6% year-over-year, compared to 54. 3% for iHeartMedia, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PODC leads at 17. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PODC or AMWL or TDOC or IHRT?
Teladoc Health, Inc.
(TDOC) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 9% net margin versus -38. 4% for American Well Corporation — meaning it keeps -7. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IHRT leads at -0. 5% versus -42. 2% for AMWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PODC or AMWL or TDOC or IHRT?
In this comparison, IHRT (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. PODC, AMWL, TDOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is PODC or AMWL or TDOC or IHRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PodcastOne, Inc.
(PODC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PODC: -19. 6%, TDOC: -41. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PODC and AMWL and TDOC and IHRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (PODC (Communication Services) and AMWL (Healthcare) and TDOC (Healthcare) and IHRT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PODC is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMWL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.