Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
POET vs NVDA vs INTC vs AVGO vs AMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
POET vs NVDA vs INTC vs AVGO vs AMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.67B | $5.23T | $627.10B | $2.04T | $742.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $763K | $215.94B | $53.76B | $68.28B | $37.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-51M | $120.07B | $-3.17B | $24.97B | $4.99B |
| Gross Margin | -17.0% | 71.1% | 35.4% | 67.1% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | -51.5% | 60.4% | -9.4% | 40.9% | 11.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.0x | 116.5x | 38.0x | 62.4x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $11.41B | $46.59B | $65.14B | $4.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $10.61B | $14.27B | $16.18B | $5.54B |
POET vs NVDA vs INTC vs AVGO vs AMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| POET Technologies I… (POET) | 100 | 295.6 | +195.6% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2423.6 | +2323.6% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 198.5 | +98.5% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1476.1 | +1376.1% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 846.1 | +746.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POET vs NVDA vs INTC vs AVGO vs AMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
POET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 243.2% 10Y total return vs AMD's 123.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.27 vs AMD's 12.08
INTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +494.7% vs NVDA's +83.4%
AVGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.96, yield 0.5%
- 0.5% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, AMD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs POET's -91.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (26.0x vs 62.4x), PEG 0.27 vs 12.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs POET's -66.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.74 vs POET's 3.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +494.7% vs NVDA's +83.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs POET's -46.9% |
POET vs NVDA vs INTC vs AVGO vs AMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
POET vs NVDA vs INTC vs AVGO vs AMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories
AVGO leads 1 • POET leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • AMD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 283125.0x POET's $762,695. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POET's -66.3%. On growth, POET holds the edge at +80.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $762,695 | $215.9B | $53.8B | $68.3B | $37.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $133.2B | $4.0B | $38.8B | $6.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$51M | $120.1B | -$3.2B | $25.0B | $5.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | $96.7B | -$3.1B | $28.9B | $8.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | +71.1% | +35.4% | +67.1% | +50.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -51.5% | +60.4% | -9.4% | +40.9% | +11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -66.3% | +55.6% | -5.9% | +36.6% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -46.2% | +44.8% | -5.8% | +42.3% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +80.0% | +73.2% | +7.2% | +29.5% | +37.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +97.8% | -2.8% | +31.6% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.9x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 74% valuation discount to AMD's 171.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.46x vs AMD's 33.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $5.23T | $627.1B | $2.04T | $742.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $5.23T | $659.4B | $2.09T | $741.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.63x | 43.92x | -2120.46x | 90.15x | 171.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.00x | 116.47x | 37.99x | 62.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.46x | — | 1.81x | 33.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 39.27x | 56.44x | 60.94x | 110.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9999.00x | 24.22x | 11.87x | 31.91x | 21.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 31.85x | 33.43x | 4.80x | 25.67x | 11.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 54.10x | — | 75.75x | 110.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-76 for POET. AMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs POET's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -76.1% | +76.3% | -2.7% | +32.9% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -46.9% | +58.1% | -1.6% | +14.9% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +81.8% | -0.0% | +14.9% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +97.2% | -0.0% | +16.9% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.07x | 0.37x | 0.80x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | $807M | $32.3B | $49.0B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $10.6B | $14.3B | $16.2B | $5.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $11.4B | $46.6B | $65.1B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -396.56x | 545.03x | 3.71x | 9.24x | 33.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $150,908 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,204 for POET. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +494.7% total return vs NVDA's +83.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 94.7% vs POET's 35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.7% | +14.0% | +217.2% | +23.9% | +103.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.4% | +83.4% | +494.7% | +108.2% | +347.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.4% | +638.6% | +307.9% | +594.1% | +378.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.0% | +1409.1% | +129.0% | +908.9% | +499.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.8% | +24324.1% | +350.5% | +3019.8% | +12371.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.3% | +94.7% | +59.8% | +90.8% | +68.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVDA and AMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POET's 3.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMD currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs POET's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.15x | 1.74x | 2.27x | 1.96x | 2.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.50 | $217.80 | $130.57 | $437.68 | $456.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.87 | $115.21 | $18.97 | $203.69 | $101.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.6% | +98.8% | +95.7% | +98.2% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 63.4 | 80.5 | 60.0 | 76.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.4M | 160.0M | 113.6M | 23.1M | 36.8M |
Analyst Outlook
AVGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POET as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", INTC as "Hold", AVGO as "Buy", AMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.1% upside for NVDA (target: $276) vs -36.3% for INTC (target: $80). AVGO is the only dividend payer here at 0.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $275.74 | $79.55 | $443.72 | $401.65 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 79 | 84 | 58 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | $2.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.2% |
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AVGO leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
POET vs NVDA vs INTC vs AVGO vs AMD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POET or NVDA or INTC or AVGO or AMD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -91. 1% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 9x trailing P/E (26. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate POET Technologies Inc. (POET) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POET or NVDA or INTC or AVGO or AMD?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 43.
9x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 171. 8x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 26. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POET or NVDA or INTC or AVGO or AMD?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1409%, compared to +42.
0% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +243. 2% versus POET's +12. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POET or NVDA or INTC or AVGO or AMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
74β versus POET Technologies Inc. 's 3. 15β — meaning POET is approximately 81% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POET or NVDA or INTC or AVGO or AMD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -91. 1% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadcom Inc. grew EPS 287. 8% year-over-year, compared to -84. 3% for POET Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POET or NVDA or INTC or AVGO or AMD?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -1368. 6% for POET Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -725. 7% for POET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POET leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is POET or NVDA or INTC or AVGO or AMD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 26. 0x forward P/E versus 116. 5x for Intel Corporation — 90. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 28. 1% to $275. 74.
08Which pays a better dividend — POET or NVDA or INTC or AVGO or AMD?
In this comparison, AVGO (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. POET, NVDA, INTC, AMD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is POET or NVDA or INTC or AVGO or AMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 5% yield). POET Technologies Inc. (POET) carries a higher beta of 3. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVGO: +30. 2%, POET: +12. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between POET and NVDA and INTC and AVGO and AMD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: POET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock. AVGO pays a dividend while POET, NVDA, INTC, AMD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.