Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs JPM vs V vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Banks - Diversified
Financial - Credit Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs JPM vs V vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Banks - Diversified | Financial - Credit Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $255M | $367M | $505M | $896.00B | $618.49B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.74B | $335M | $280.33B | $43.03B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-199M | $107M | $57.05B | $22.24B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.4% | 63.8% | 60.0% | 81.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.5% | 42.6% | 25.9% | 61.1% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 38.4x | 3.3x | 10.9x | 14.4x | 24.5x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $450K | $2.66B | $152M | $942.38B | $25.17B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48K | $1.35B | $199M | $343.34B | $20.15B | $10.27B |
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs JPM vs V vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andretti Acquisitio… (POLE) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 33.4 | -66.6% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 86.0 | -14.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 111.2 | +11.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs JPM vs V vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
POLE is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 4.0% vs JPM's 2.2%
PSFE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (3.3x vs 25.3x)
ACIC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.1%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- 13.1% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2%
- Beta 0.10 vs PSFE's 2.44, lower leverage
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs V's 330.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- +21.8% vs PSFE's -45.0%
V is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 51.7% margin vs PSFE's -11.4%
- 22.7% ROA vs PSFE's -4.2%, ROIC 29.2% vs 3.6%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- Beta -0.20, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.46x
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.1% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.3x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.7% margin vs PSFE's -11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs PSFE's 2.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs PSFE's -45.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs PSFE's -4.2%, ROIC 29.2% vs 3.6% |
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs JPM vs V vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs JPM vs V vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 2 of 6 categories
PSFE leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • KO leads 1 • POLE leads 0 • ACIC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and POLE operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. V is the more profitable business, keeping 51.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -11.4%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B | $335M | $280.3B | $43.0B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $373M | $154M | $81.4B | $27.6B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$199M | $107M | $57.0B | $22.2B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $174M | $71M | $100.9B | $21.2B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +48.4% | +63.8% | +60.0% | +81.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.5% | +42.6% | +25.9% | +61.1% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -11.4% | +31.9% | +20.4% | +51.7% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +10.0% | +21.1% | +36.0% | +49.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.4% | +9.3% | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | -115.2% | +4.3% | +16.0% | +35.3% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, ACIC trades at a 87% valuation discount to POLE's 38.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $255M | $367M | $505M | $896.0B | $618.5B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $256M | $1.7B | $459M | $1.50T | $623.5B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.36x | -2.26x | 4.86x | 16.00x | 31.61x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.27x | 10.94x | 14.40x | 24.51x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.90x | 2.00x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.24x | 2.81x | 18.36x | 24.73x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.22x | 1.51x | 3.20x | 15.46x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 0.63x | 1.64x | 2.47x | 16.72x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.64x | 7.13x | 8.88x | 28.66x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-29 for PSFE. POLE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs POLE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.6% | -28.6% | +35.7% | +15.9% | +58.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | -4.2% | +9.0% | +1.3% | +22.7% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +3.6% | +41.0% | +4.5% | +29.2% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +3.6% | +26.0% | +8.9% | +36.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 4.06x | 0.48x | 2.60x | 0.66x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $401,531 | $1.3B | -$46M | $599.0B | $5.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48,469 | $1.3B | $199M | $343.3B | $20.2B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $450,000 | $2.7B | $152M | $942.4B | $25.2B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.75x | 14.20x | 0.74x | 26.72x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $508 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs PSFE's -45.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs PSFE's -12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.2% | -11.0% | -1.6% | -0.5% | -6.6% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.5% | -45.0% | +5.2% | +21.8% | -12.5% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | -33.0% | +137.8% | +138.2% | +45.6% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | -94.9% | +98.7% | +118.2% | +42.0% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | -94.1% | -24.1% | +465.8% | +330.2% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | -12.5% | +33.5% | +33.6% | +13.3% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POLE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POLE currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.00x | 2.44x | 0.10x | 0.94x | 0.54x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.90 | $15.02 | $13.06 | $337.25 | $374.17 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.36 | $5.95 | $9.79 | $262.71 | $293.89 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +47.3% | +80.0% | +95.1% | +86.2% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 39.7 | 44.8 | 59.1 | 46.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 324K | 238K | 7.0M | 6.4M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", ACIC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", V as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.7% upside for PSFE (target: $10) vs -81.8% for ACIC (target: $2). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs V's 0.73%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.13 | $1.90 | $339.75 | $368.91 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 5 | 61 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.9% | +0.7% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 15 | 18 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $5.95 | $2.36 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +27.6% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +2.2% | +0.2% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs JPM vs V vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POLE or PSFE or ACIC or JPM or V or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the stronger pick with 13.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or JPM or V or KO?
On trailing P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Andretti Acquisition Corp. II at 38. 4x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 3. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or JPM or V or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -94. 9% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PSFE's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or JPM or V or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 44β — meaning PSFE is approximately -1317% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Andretti Acquisition Corp. II (POLE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or JPM or V or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is pulling ahead at 13.
1% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Andretti Acquisition Corp. II grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACIC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or JPM or V or KO?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 0. 0% for POLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is POLE or PSFE or ACIC or JPM or V or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 3. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSFE: 42. 7% to $10. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or JPM or V or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), V (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. POLE, PSFE, ACIC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is POLE or PSFE or ACIC or JPM or V or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 44 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PSFE: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between POLE and PSFE and ACIC and JPM and V and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (POLE (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and ACIC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and V (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: POLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, V, KO pay a dividend while POLE, PSFE, ACIC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.