Rental & Leasing Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Banks - Diversified
PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $2.87B | $4.97T | $625.47B | $223.15B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $253.49B | $53.76B | $44.49B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $159.61B | $-3.17B | $9.92B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | 74.1% | 35.4% | 54.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -289.8% | 64.0% | -9.4% | 25.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.0x | 115.0x | 19.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $11.41B | $46.59B | $16.37B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $295M | $10.61B | $14.27B | $7.84B | $343.34B |
PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pony AI Inc. Americ… (PONY) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 148.4 | +48.4% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 518.0 | +418.0% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 133.6 | +33.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 128.4 | +28.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PONY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 174.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.81, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.24 vs QCOM's 9.48
INTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +499.8% vs PONY's -35.8%
Among these 5 stocks, QCOM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 19.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 9.48
- Beta 0.94 vs PONY's 3.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 19.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 9.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | 63.0% margin vs PONY's -148.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs PONY's 3.32 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +499.8% vs PONY's -35.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 83.1% ROA vs PONY's -11.4%, ROIC 81.8% vs -20.9% |
PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • PONY leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • QCOM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3110.4x PONY's $90M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 63.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PONY's -148.5%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +85.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $253.5B | $53.8B | $44.5B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$256M | $165.5B | $4.0B | $12.8B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | $159.6B | -$3.2B | $9.9B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$209M | $119.1B | -$3.1B | $12.5B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +74.1% | +35.4% | +54.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +64.0% | -9.4% | +25.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -148.5% | +63.0% | -5.9% | +22.3% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +47.0% | -5.8% | +28.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | +85.2% | +7.2% | -3.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.8% | +2.1% | -2.8% | +173.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 62% valuation discount to QCOM's 42.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.44x vs QCOM's 20.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $4.97T | $625.5B | $223.2B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $4.97T | $657.8B | $231.7B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.29x | 41.87x | -2114.94x | 42.26x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.98x | 115.02x | 19.72x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.44x | — | 20.32x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 37.30x | 56.30x | 16.60x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.83x | 23.01x | 11.83x | 5.04x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 31.97x | 4.79x | 11.03x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 51.40x | — | 17.41x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 111.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-12 for PONY. PONY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INTC scores 6/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | +111.7% | -2.7% | +40.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.4% | +83.1% | -1.6% | +18.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.9% | +81.8% | -0.0% | +29.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | +97.2% | -0.0% | +28.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.07x | 0.37x | 0.77x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$280M | $807M | $32.3B | $8.5B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $295M | $10.6B | $14.3B | $7.8B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $11.4B | $46.6B | $16.4B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 636.02x | 3.71x | 17.60x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $114,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,792 for PONY. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +499.8% total return vs PONY's -35.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 73.3% vs PONY's -12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.3% | +8.8% | +216.3% | +23.4% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.8% | +41.7% | +499.8% | +35.7% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +420.5% | +278.6% | +81.8% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +1040.5% | +119.7% | +66.0% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +17472.3% | +316.3% | +354.3% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.1% | +73.3% | +55.9% | +22.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PONY's 3.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs PONY's 32.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.32x | 1.81x | 2.53x | 1.92x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.92 | $236.54 | $132.75 | $259.92 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.95 | $140.85 | $18.97 | $121.99 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +86.7% | +93.8% | +81.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 44.9 | 57.8 | 47.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 147.4M | 134.9M | 21.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QCOM and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PONY as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", INTC as "Hold", QCOM as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 182.2% upside for PONY (target: $23) vs -29.8% for INTC (target: $87). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs PONY's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $309.46 | $87.42 | $191.05 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 79 | 84 | 69 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.0% | — | +1.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $0.04 | — | $3.44 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +3.9% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 42. 3x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 24x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1041%, compared to -32.
1% for Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +174. 7% versus PONY's -32. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares's 3. 32β — meaning PONY is approximately 252% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intel Corporation grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or JPM?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -148. 9% for Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -289. 8% for PONY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 115. 0x for Intel Corporation — 100. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PONY: 182. 2% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), QCOM (1. 6% yield), PONY (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NVDA, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) carries a higher beta of 3. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, PONY: -32. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PONY and NVDA and INTC and QCOM and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PONY (Industrials) and NVDA (Technology) and INTC (Technology) and QCOM (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PONY is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. QCOM, JPM pay a dividend while PONY, NVDA, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.