Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PONY logo
PONY
NVDA logo
NVDA
INTC logo
INTC
QCOM logo
QCOM
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PONY
Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2.87B
5Y Perf.-37.4%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.97T
5Y Perf.+48.4%
INTC
Intel Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$625.47B
5Y Perf.+418.0%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$223.15B
5Y Perf.+33.6%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+28.9%

PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PONY logoPONY
NVDA logoNVDA
INTC logoINTC
QCOM logoQCOM
KO logoKO
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$2.87B$4.97T$625.47B$223.15B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$90M$253.49B$53.76B$44.49B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-134M$159.61B$-3.17B$9.92B$13.70B
Gross Margin15.7%74.1%35.4%54.8%61.7%
Operating Margin-289.8%64.0%-9.4%25.5%29.3%
Forward P/E23.0x115.0x19.7x25.3x
Total Debt$15M$11.41B$46.59B$16.37B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$295M$10.61B$14.27B$7.84B$10.27B

PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PONY
NVDA
INTC
QCOM
KO
StockNov 24Jun 26Return
Pony AI Inc. Americ… (PONY)10062.6-37.4%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)100148.4+48.4%
Intel Corporation (INTC)100518.0+418.0%
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)100133.6+33.6%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100128.9+28.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NVDA leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Intel Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. QCOM and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇NVDA emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PONY
Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, PONY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
The Growth Play

NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
  • 174.7% 10Y total return vs QCOM's 354.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.81, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
  • PEG 0.24 vs QCOM's 9.48
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
INTC
Intel Corporation
The Momentum Pick

INTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +499.8% vs PONY's -35.8%
Best for: momentum
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The Income Pick

QCOM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.92, yield 1.6%
  • Lower P/E (19.7x vs 25.3x)
Best for: income & stability
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVDA logoNVDA65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
ValueQCOM logoQCOMLower P/E (19.7x vs 25.3x)
Quality / MarginsNVDA logoNVDA63.0% margin vs PONY's -148.5%
Stability / SafetyNVDA logoNVDABeta 1.81 vs PONY's 3.32
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)INTC logoINTC+499.8% vs PONY's -35.8%
Efficiency (ROA)NVDA logoNVDA83.1% ROA vs PONY's -11.4%, ROIC 81.8% vs -20.9%

PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Quantum Computing Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Quantum Computing Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PONYPony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares
FY 2025
Product
66.8%$33M
Engineering Solution Services
33.2%$17M
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
FY 2026
Data Center
89.7%$193.7B
Gaming
7.4%$16.0B
Professional Visualization
1.5%$3.2B
Automotive
1.1%$2.3B
OEM And Other
0.3%$619M
INTCIntel Corporation
FY 2025
Client Computing Group
61.0%$32.2B
Intel Foundry Services
33.7%$17.8B
Data Center Group
32.0%$16.9B
Other Segments
6.7%$3.6B
Intersegment Eliminations
-33.5%$-17,683,000,000
QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
FY 2025
QCT
87.3%$38.4B
QTL
12.7%$5.6B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNVDALAGGINGINTC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $253.5B annually — 2812.6x PONY's $90M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 63.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PONY's -148.5%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +85.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationINTC logoINTCIntel CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$90M$253.5B$53.8B$44.5B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$256M$165.5B$4.0B$12.8B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$134M$159.6B-$3.2B$9.9B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$209M$119.1B-$3.1B$12.5B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+15.7%+74.1%+35.4%+54.8%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.9%+64.0%-9.4%+25.5%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-148.5%+63.0%-5.9%+22.3%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.3%+47.0%-5.8%+28.1%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.3%+85.2%+7.2%-3.5%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+110.8%+2.1%-2.8%+173.0%+18.2%
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 27.2x trailing earnings, KO trades at a 36% valuation discount to QCOM's 42.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.44x vs QCOM's 20.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationINTC logoINTCIntel CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$2.9B$4.97T$625.5B$223.2B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.6B$4.97T$657.8B$231.7B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-23.29x41.87x-2114.94x42.26x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.98x115.02x19.72x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.44x20.32x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple37.30x56.30x16.60x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue31.83x23.01x11.83x5.04x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.81x31.97x4.79x11.03x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF51.40x17.41x67.15x
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NVDA delivers a 111.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-12 for PONY. PONY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationINTC logoINTCIntel CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-12.4%+111.7%-2.7%+40.2%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.4%+83.1%-1.6%+18.4%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-20.9%+81.8%-0.0%+29.1%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-19.4%+97.2%-0.0%+28.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944667
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.07x0.37x0.77x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$280M$807M$32.3B$8.5B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$295M$10.6B$14.3B$7.8B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15M$11.4B$46.6B$16.4B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense636.02x3.71x17.60x10.70x
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $114,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,792 for PONY. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +499.8% total return vs PONY's -35.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 73.3% vs PONY's -12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationINTC logoINTCIntel CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-49.3%+8.8%+216.3%+23.4%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-35.8%+41.7%+499.8%+35.7%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.1%+420.5%+278.6%+81.8%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.1%+1040.5%+119.7%+66.0%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.1%+17472.3%+316.3%+354.3%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.1%+73.3%+55.9%+22.0%+13.7%
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PONY's 3.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PONY's 32.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationINTC logoINTCIntel CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.32x1.81x2.53x1.92x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.92$236.54$132.75$259.92$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.95$140.85$18.97$121.99$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+32.7%+86.7%+93.8%+81.5%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.644.957.847.660.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.3M147.4M134.9M21.1M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PONY as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", INTC as "Hold", QCOM as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 182.2% upside for PONY (target: $23) vs -29.8% for INTC (target: $87). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs PONY's 0.21%.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationINTC logoINTCIntel CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.00$309.46$87.42$191.05$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts279846948
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.0%+1.6%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0202256
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02$0.04$3.44$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.8%0.0%+3.9%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallNVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PONY vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or KO?

On trailing P/E, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the cheapest at 27.

2x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 42. 3x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 19. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 24x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or KO?

Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1041%, compared to -32.

1% for Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +174. 7% versus PONY's -32. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares's 3. 32β — meaning PONY is approximately -1760% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.

5% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intel Corporation grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or KO?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.

6% net margin versus -148. 9% for Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -289. 8% for PONY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 115. 0x for Intel Corporation — 95. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PONY: 182. 2% to $23. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), QCOM (1. 6% yield), PONY (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NVDA, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PONY or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) carries a higher beta of 3. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PONY: -32. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PONY and NVDA and INTC and QCOM and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (PONY (Industrials) and NVDA (Technology) and INTC (Technology) and QCOM (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PONY is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. QCOM, KO pay a dividend while PONY, NVDA, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.