Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
POOL vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Residential Construction
Industrial - Distribution
POOL vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Construction | Residential Construction | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $6.86B | $8.25B | $7.61B | $5.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.36B | $14.82B | $2.97B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $406M | $292M | $265M | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 29.9% | 34.0% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 4.2% | 13.0% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 13.2x | 26.9x | 28.0x |
| Total Debt | $349M | $5.65B | $1.05B | $980M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $182M | $322M | $191M |
POOL vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pool Corporation (POOL) | 100 | 69.9 | -30.1% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 384.6 | +284.6% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 465.4 | +365.4% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POOL vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
POOL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 29.4%, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 1.00, yield 2.7%, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 1.00 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 28.0x), PEG 1.67 vs 6.76
IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 5.6%
- PEG 1.11 vs SITE's 6.76
- 8.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
- +67.7% vs POOL's -37.3%
SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 3.6% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 28.0x), PEG 1.67 vs 6.76 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.7% vs POOL's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4% |
POOL vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
POOL vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBP leads in 3 of 6 categories
BLDR leads 1 • POOL leads 1 • SITE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 5.0x IBP's $3.0B. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, POOL holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $14.8B | $3.0B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $636M | $1.2B | $704M | $382M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $406M | $292M | $265M | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $605M | $862M | $49M | $246M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +29.9% | +34.0% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +4.2% | +13.0% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +2.0% | +8.9% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +5.8% | +1.7% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.2% | -10.1% | -0.4% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -151.2% | +18.4% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.2x trailing earnings, POOL trades at a 52% valuation discount to SITE's 35.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 1.20x vs SITE's 8.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $8.2B | $7.6B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.1B | $13.7B | $8.3B | $6.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.24x | 19.17x | 29.08x | 35.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.90x | 13.20x | 26.91x | 28.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.44x | 2.43x | 1.20x | 8.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.25x | 9.95x | 17.01x | 16.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 0.54x | 2.56x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.88x | 1.92x | 10.76x | 3.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.18x | 9.66x | 25.29x | 21.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 39.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. POOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs BLDR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.2% | +6.9% | +39.1% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.3% | +2.6% | +13.0% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.3% | +6.4% | +20.7% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.0% | +8.5% | +22.6% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 1.30x | 1.48x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $244M | $5.5B | $731M | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $182M | $322M | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $349M | $5.6B | $1.1B | $980M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.20x | 2.19x | 12.26x | 6.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $21,329 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,721 for POOL. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +67.7% total return vs POOL's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 35.5% vs POOL's -17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.0% | -28.7% | +6.4% | -3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.3% | -33.3% | +67.7% | +0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | -33.0% | +149.0% | -20.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.8% | +52.0% | +113.3% | -37.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.0% | +560.4% | +898.7% | +353.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.2% | -12.5% | +35.5% | -7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POOL and IBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
POOL is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBP currently trades 80.9% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.65x | 1.19x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $345.00 | $151.03 | $349.00 | $168.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $186.95 | $73.40 | $150.83 | $112.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.2% | +49.4% | +80.9% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.2 | 29.7 | 42.2 | 38.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 749K | 2.4M | 318K | 686K |
Analyst Outlook
POOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POOL as "Buy", BLDR as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", SITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.3% upside for POOL (target: $279) vs 3.8% for IBP (target: $293). For income investors, POOL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.65% vs IBP's 1.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $279.29 | $109.92 | $293.00 | $162.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 43 | 27 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.96 | — | $3.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | +5.0% | +2.3% | +1.8% |
IBP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
POOL vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POOL or BLDR or IBP or SITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Pool Corporation (POOL) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pool Corporation (POOL) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POOL or BLDR or IBP or SITE?
On trailing P/E, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the cheapest at 17.
2x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 1. 11x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 76x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POOL or BLDR or IBP or SITE?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +113. 3%, compared to -52. 8% for Pool Corporation (POOL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +894. 2% versus POOL's +149. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POOL or BLDR or IBP or SITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pool Corporation (POOL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 65% more volatile than POOL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pool Corporation (POOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POOL or BLDR or IBP or SITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POOL or BLDR or IBP or SITE?
Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SITE leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is POOL or BLDR or IBP or SITE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 76x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 28. 0x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POOL: 49. 3% to $279. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — POOL or BLDR or IBP or SITE?
In this comparison, POOL (2.
7% yield), IBP (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR, SITE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is POOL or BLDR or IBP or SITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 1% yield, +894. 2% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +894. 2%, BLDR: +560. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between POOL and BLDR and IBP and SITE?
These companies operate in different sectors (POOL (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and SITE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: POOL is a small-cap deep-value stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POOL, IBP pay a dividend while BLDR, SITE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.