Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PPTA vs EXK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Other Precious Metals
PPTA vs EXK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Other Precious Metals |
| Market Cap | $3.07B | $2.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $330M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-94M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.7% |
| Forward P/E | 129.6x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $28K | $120M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $106M |
PPTA vs EXK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perpetua Resources … (PPTA) | 100 | 442.0 | +342.0% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 172.0 | +72.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PPTA vs EXK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PPTA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.08
- EPS growth -139.7%
- 252.0% 10Y total return vs EXK's 182.7%
EXK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 5.9% revenue growth vs PPTA's -260.4%
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 129.6x)
- +193.4% vs PPTA's +93.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs PPTA's -260.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 129.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs EXK's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs EXK's 1.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +193.4% vs PPTA's +93.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.2% ROA vs PPTA's -13.7%, ROIC 1.5% vs -58.4% |
PPTA vs EXK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PPTA vs EXK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXK and PPTA operate at a comparable scale, with $330M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $330M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$75M | $49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$94M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$61M | -$129M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +9.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -39.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +154.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | -97.5% |
Valuation Metrics
EXK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 129.59x | -78.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 76.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 13.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.19x | 5.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PPTA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PPTA delivers a -14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-18 for EXK. PPTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.1% | -18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.7% | -9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -58.4% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.0% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28,288 | $120M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -39.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PPTA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PPTA five years ago would be worth $32,583 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,111 for EXK. Over the past 12 months, EXK leads with a +193.4% total return vs PPTA's +93.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PPTA at 75.1% vs EXK's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.2% | +12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +93.6% | +193.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +436.9% | +144.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +225.8% | +61.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +252.0% | +182.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +75.1% | +34.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PPTA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PPTA is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PPTA currently trades 76.3% from its 52-week high vs EXK's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.37 | $15.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.22 | $3.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.3% | +67.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 9.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PPTA as "Buy" and EXK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for PPTA (target: $41) vs 25.6% for EXK (target: $13).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $12.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PPTA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EXK leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
PPTA vs EXK: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PPTA or EXK a better buy right now?
Perpetua Resources Corp.
(PPTA) offers the better valuation at 129. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perpetua Resources Corp. (PPTA) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PPTA or EXK?
Over the past 5 years, Perpetua Resources Corp.
(PPTA) delivered a total return of +225. 8%, compared to +61. 1% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PPTA returned +252. 0% versus EXK's +182. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PPTA or EXK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perpetua Resources Corp.
(PPTA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 58% more volatile than PPTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perpetua Resources Corp. (PPTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — PPTA or EXK?
Perpetua Resources Corp.
(PPTA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXK leads at 3. 8% versus 0. 0% for PPTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXK leads at 19. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is PPTA or EXK more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PPTA: 43.
8% to $41. 00.
06Which pays a better dividend — PPTA or EXK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PPTA or EXK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perpetua Resources Corp.
(PPTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), +252. 0% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PPTA: +252. 0%, EXK: +182. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PPTA and EXK?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.