PR
Permian Resources Corporation
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$17.56B
5Y Perf.+2000.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PR vs CTRA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$24.72B
5Y Perf.+64.1%
PR vs CTRA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PR | CTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $17.56B | $24.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.69B | $6.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $649M | $1.67B |
| Gross Margin | 32.7% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | 38.7% | 30.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.70B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $154M | $119M |
PR vs CTRA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PR
CTRA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | 100 | 2100.0 | +2000.0% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 164.1 | +64.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PR vs CTRA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Coterra Energy Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PR
Permian Resources Corporation
The Growth Play
PR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth -11.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.5%
- 130.0% 10Y total return vs CTRA's 70.1%
- 1.3% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
The Income Pick
CTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, Low D/E 27.0%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.03, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.19x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PR | 1.3% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% |
| Value | PR | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 11.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | CTRA | 25.7% margin vs PR's 17.6% |
| Stability / Safety | CTRA | Beta 0.03 vs PR's 0.23, lower leverage |
| Dividends | PR | 2.9% yield, vs CTRA's 2.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PR | +82.3% vs CTRA's +45.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CTRA | 6.9% ROA vs PR's 3.7%, ROIC 10.9% vs 7.5% |
PR vs CTRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
PR vs CTRA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCTRALAGGINGPR
PRPermian Resources Cor…
1leads
CTRACoterra Energy Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CTRA5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CTRA7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTRA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.5B annually — 1.8x PR's $3.7B. CTRA is the more profitable business, keeping 25.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PR's 17.6%. On growth, CTRA holds the edge at -43.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $6.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $4.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $649M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | +40.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.7% | +30.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +40.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -43.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.6% | -10.3% |
CTRA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PR and CTRA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, CTRA trades at a 13% valuation discount to PR's 16.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTRA's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PR's 6.0x.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.6B | $24.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.1B | $28.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.57x | 14.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.51x | 11.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.02x | 5.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.47x | 8.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 1.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.51x | 15.13x |
Evenly matched — PR and CTRA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTRA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTRA delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for PR. CTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PR's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTRA scores 6/9 vs PR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $154M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.73x | 8.88x |
CTRA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PR five years ago would be worth $50,885 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,893 for CTRA. Over the past 12 months, PR leads with a +82.3% total return vs CTRA's +45.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PR at 31.0% vs CTRA's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.4% | +23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.3% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.7% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +408.8% | +128.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.0% | +70.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.0% | +12.2% |
PR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PR and CTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PR's 0.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PR currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs CTRA's 88.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.68 | $36.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.64 | $22.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +88.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.3M | 10.1M |
Evenly matched — PR and CTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PR and CTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PR as "Buy" and CTRA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.1% upside for PR (target: $22) vs 4.5% for CTRA (target: $34). For income investors, PR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs CTRA's 2.75%.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.29 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.6% |
Evenly matched — PR and CTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CTRA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallCoterra Energy Inc. (CTRA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PR vs CTRA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PR or CTRA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is the stronger pick with 1.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Permian Resources Corporation (PR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PR or CTRA?
On trailing P/E, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Permian Resources Corporation at 16. 6x. On forward P/E, Permian Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PR or CTRA?
Over the past 5 years, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) delivered a total return of +408.
8%, compared to +128. 9% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PR returned +130. 0% versus CTRA's +70. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PR or CTRA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus Permian Resources Corporation's 0. 23β — meaning PR is approximately 684% more volatile than CTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 32% for Permian Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PR or CTRA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is pulling ahead at 1.
3% versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coterra Energy Inc. grew EPS 49. 0% year-over-year, compared to -11. 7% for Permian Resources Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PR leads at 33. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PR or CTRA?
Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 4% net margin versus 18. 5% for Permian Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 62. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89. 1% versus 29. 0% for PR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTRA leads at 60. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PR or CTRA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) trades at 11.
5x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Coterra Energy Inc. — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PR: 5. 1% to $22. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — PR or CTRA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Permian Resources Corporation (PR) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 2. 8% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA).
09Is PR or CTRA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRA: +70. 1%, PR: +130. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PR and CTRA?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PR: -100.0% · CTRA: -43.3%)Net Margin>
%
(PR: 17.6% · CTRA: 25.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PR: 16.6x · CTRA: 14.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.