Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $1.45B | $161.07B | $1.92B | $112.69B | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $322M | $10.58B | $674M | $25.12B | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-102M | $2.98B | $-173M | $3.25B | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 63.0% | 66.3% | 75.2% | 63.5% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -33.9% | 30.5% | -27.2% | 22.4% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 43.8x | — | 19.6x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $52M | $303M | $290M | $14.86B | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $287M | $3.37B | $103M | $4.01B | $2.22B |
PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROCEPT BioRobotics… (PRCT) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 136.8 | +36.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 14.5 | -85.5% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 111.6 | +11.6% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 62.2 | -37.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 37.2% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
ISRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs SYK's 187.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
- 28.2% margin vs PRCT's -31.8%
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs PRCT's -52.1%
SYK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.32 vs MDT's 36.00
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Beta 0.47, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.85x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.2% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs PRCT's -31.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs SYK's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs PRCT's -52.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs PRCT's -20.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs -55.7% |
PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
MDT leads 2 • PRCT leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • SYK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 110.2x PRCT's $322M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRCT's -31.8%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $322M | $10.6B | $674M | $25.1B | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$102M | $3.8B | -$165M | $6.3B | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$102M | $3.0B | -$173M | $3.2B | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$81M | $2.8B | -$48M | $4.3B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.0% | +66.3% | +75.2% | +63.5% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.9% | +30.5% | -27.2% | +22.4% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.8% | +28.2% | -25.7% | +12.9% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.0% | +26.8% | -7.1% | +17.1% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.2% | +23.0% | +12.3% | +11.4% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.4% | +18.8% | -100.0% | +56.0% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MDT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.6x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 63% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.36x vs MDT's 36.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $161.1B | $1.9B | $112.7B | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $158.0B | $2.1B | $123.5B | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.79x | 57.62x | -13.80x | 35.03x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.84x | — | 19.62x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.65x | — | 2.36x | 36.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 43.62x | — | 20.31x | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.70x | 16.00x | 2.92x | 4.49x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.86x | 9.17x | 5.51x | 5.02x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 64.67x | — | 26.31x | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs NVCR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.7% | +16.9% | -50.8% | +15.0% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.3% | +14.8% | -16.5% | +6.9% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -55.7% | +15.0% | -16.4% | +11.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.5% | +16.5% | -28.9% | +13.0% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.02x | 0.85x | 0.66x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$235M | -$3.1B | $187M | $10.8B | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $287M | $3.4B | $103M | $4.0B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $303M | $290M | $14.9B | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.92x | — | -96.80x | 6.72x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $15,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs PRCT's -52.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.4% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.3% | -19.3% | +28.3% | -15.2% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.1% | -15.4% | +1.1% | -22.5% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.8% | +49.6% | -75.7% | +5.5% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | +58.7% | -91.3% | +21.5% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | +554.2% | +30.3% | +187.1% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.7% | +14.4% | -37.6% | +1.8% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs PRCT's 38.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.02x | 2.20x | 0.55x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.85 | $603.88 | $20.06 | $404.87 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.35 | $427.84 | $9.82 | $289.91 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.1% | +75.1% | +83.9% | +72.7% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 42.4 | 69.8 | 24.3 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 1.8M | 1.5M | 2.1M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRCT as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", SYK as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 37.2% for SYK (target: $404). For income investors, MDT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.57% vs SYK's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.50 | $622.60 | $33.50 | $403.69 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 55 | 15 | 50 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 34 | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.36 | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) is the stronger pick with 37.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK or MDT?
On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.
6x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 32x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +58. 7%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus PRCT's -39. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 373% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) is pulling ahead at 37.
2% versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medtronic plc grew EPS 30. 8% year-over-year, compared to 1. 7% for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRCT leads at 60. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK or MDT?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -31. 0% for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -33. 7% for PRCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK or MDT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 32x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 43. 8x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 29. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield), SYK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. PRCT, ISRG, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRCT and ISRG and NVCR and SYK and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PRCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SYK, MDT pay a dividend while PRCT, ISRG, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.