PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
Leisure
Market Cap$2.02B
5Y Perf.+105.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PRKS vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$95.62B
5Y Perf.-33.7%
PRKS vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PRKS | CMCSA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $95.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.66B | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $168M | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 92.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $9.48B |
PRKS vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PRKS
CMCSA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 205.2 | +105.2% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.3 | -33.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRKS vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CMCSA leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. United Parks & Resorts Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 103.5% 10Y total return vs CMCSA's 15.4%
- -18.7% vs CMCSA's -19.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
The Income Pick
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- Rev growth -0.0%, EPS growth 30.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.88x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CMCSA | -0.0% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% |
| Value | CMCSA | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 10.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | CMCSA | 14.8% margin vs PRKS's 10.1% |
| Stability / Safety | CMCSA | Beta 0.21 vs PRKS's 1.54 |
| Dividends | CMCSA | 5.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PRKS | -18.7% vs CMCSA's -19.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CMCSA | 6.9% ROA vs PRKS's 6.4%, ROIC 8.2% vs 25.5% |
PRKS vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
PRKS vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCMCSALAGGINGPRKS
PRKSUnited Parks & Resort…
2leads
CMCSAComcast Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PRKSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CMCSA4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PRKS4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PRKS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CMCSA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CMCSA1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PRKS and CMCSA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 75.4x PRKS's $1.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.8% (CMCSA) to 10.1% (PRKS). On growth, CMCSA holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… | CMCSAComcast Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $540M | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $168M | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $263M | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.0% | -32.6% |
Evenly matched — PRKS and CMCSA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 60% valuation discount to PRKS's 12.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMCSA's 5.3x.
| Metric | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… | CMCSAComcast Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $95.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $196.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.11x | 4.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.99x | 7.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.56x | 5.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.68x | 4.37x |
CMCSA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMCSA scores 7/9 vs PRKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… | CMCSAComcast Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.5% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$100M | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.69x | 6.84x |
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRKS five years ago would be worth $6,903 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,482 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, PRKS leads with a -18.7% total return vs CMCSA's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMCSA at -9.7% vs PRKS's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… | CMCSAComcast Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.7% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.3% | -26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.5% | +15.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.1% | -9.7% |
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRKS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMCSA currently trades 71.6% from its 52-week high vs PRKS's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… | CMCSAComcast Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.95 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.77 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.1% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 944K | 28.4M |
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PRKS as "Buy" and CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for PRKS (target: $48) vs 21.5% for CMCSA (target: $32). CMCSA is the only dividend payer here at 5.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… | CMCSAComcast Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.60 | $31.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +7.5% |
CMCSA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
CMCSA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). PRKS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallComcast Corporation (CMCSA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PRKS vs CMCSA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRKS or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger pick with -0.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRKS or CMCSA?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus United Parks & Resorts Inc. at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRKS or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) delivered a total return of -31. 0%, compared to -45. 2% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +103. 5% versus CMCSA's +15. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRKS or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus United Parks & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning PRKS is approximately 635% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — PRKS or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is pulling ahead at -0.
0% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Comcast Corporation grew EPS 30. 2% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for United Parks & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMCSA leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRKS or CMCSA?
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
0% net margin versus 10. 1% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 0% versus 16. 7% for CMCSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRKS leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRKS or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7.
4x forward P/E versus 10. 0x for United Parks & Resorts Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 28. 4% to $47. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRKS or CMCSA?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield) pays a dividend. PRKS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRKS or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, PRKS: +103. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRKS and CMCSA?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRKS (Consumer Cyclical) and CMCSA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
CMCSA pays a dividend while PRKS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PRKS: -2.8% · CMCSA: 5.3%)Net Margin>
%
(PRKS: 10.1% · CMCSA: 14.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PRKS: 12.1x · CMCSA: 4.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.