Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PRMB vs FIZZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
PRMB vs FIZZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $7.34B | $3.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.66B | $1.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $60M | $187M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $641M | $72M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $377M | $194M |
PRMB vs FIZZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primo Brands Corpor… (PRMB) | 100 | 164.6 | +64.6% |
| National Beverage C… (FIZZ) | 100 | 122.7 | +22.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRMB vs FIZZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRMB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.3%, EPS growth 410.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 57.9%
- 104.4% 10Y total return vs FIZZ's 91.0%
- 29.3% revenue growth vs FIZZ's 0.8%
FIZZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.29, yield 9.3%, current ratio 2.90x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.3% revenue growth vs FIZZ's 0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.3x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs PRMB's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs PRMB's 0.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.2% vs PRMB's -38.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.1% ROA vs PRMB's 0.6%, ROIC 57.9% vs 5.5% |
PRMB vs FIZZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIZZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 5.6x FIZZ's $1.2B. FIZZ is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRMB's 0.9%. On growth, PRMB holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.7B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $258M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $60M | $187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $250M | $157M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +13.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.1% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PRMB and FIZZ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, FIZZ trades at a 81% valuation discount to PRMB's 94.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FIZZ's 12.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRMB's 17.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.6B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 94.29x | 17.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.31x | 17.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.66x | 12.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.48x | 7.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.23x | 19.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIZZ leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIZZ delivers a 39.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $2 for PRMB. FIZZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRMB's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRMB scores 6/9 vs FIZZ's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.0% | +39.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +27.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +57.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +40.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $264M | -$122M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $377M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $641M | $72M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.27x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRMB five years ago would be worth $13,422 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,707 for FIZZ. Over the past 12 months, FIZZ leads with a -20.2% total return vs PRMB's -38.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRMB at 15.1% vs FIZZ's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.0% | +10.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.8% | -20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.6% | -26.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.2% | -12.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.4% | +91.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.1% | -9.6% |
Risk & Volatility
FIZZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIZZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRMB's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIZZ currently trades 73.0% from its 52-week high vs PRMB's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.70 | $47.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.36 | $31.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +73.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 218K |
Analyst Outlook
FIZZ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PRMB as "Buy" and FIZZ as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 29.8% upside for PRMB (target: $26) vs -2.7% for FIZZ (target: $34). FIZZ is the only dividend payer here at 9.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.71 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +9.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FIZZ leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRMB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
PRMB vs FIZZ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRMB or FIZZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Primo Brands Corporation (PRMB) is the stronger pick with 29.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ). National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primo Brands Corporation (PRMB) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRMB or FIZZ?
On trailing P/E, National Beverage Corp.
(FIZZ) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Primo Brands Corporation at 94. 3x. On forward P/E, Primo Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRMB or FIZZ?
Over the past 5 years, Primo Brands Corporation (PRMB) delivered a total return of +34.
2%, compared to -12. 9% for National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRMB returned +104. 4% versus FIZZ's +91. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRMB or FIZZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), National Beverage Corp.
(FIZZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Primo Brands Corporation's 0. 67β — meaning PRMB is approximately 133% more volatile than FIZZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 21% for Primo Brands Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRMB or FIZZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primo Brands Corporation (PRMB) is pulling ahead at 29.
3% versus 0. 8% for National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primo Brands Corporation grew EPS 410. 2% year-over-year, compared to 5. 3% for National Beverage Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRMB leads at 57. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRMB or FIZZ?
National Beverage Corp.
(FIZZ) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 6% net margin versus 0. 9% for Primo Brands Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIZZ leads at 19. 6% versus 6. 5% for PRMB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIZZ leads at 37. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRMB or FIZZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Primo Brands Corporation (PRMB) trades at 15.
3x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for National Beverage Corp. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRMB: 29. 8% to $25. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRMB or FIZZ?
In this comparison, FIZZ (9.
3% yield) pays a dividend. PRMB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRMB or FIZZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, National Beverage Corp.
(FIZZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 9. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIZZ: +91. 0%, PRMB: +104. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRMB and FIZZ?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PRMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIZZ is a small-cap deep-value stock. FIZZ pays a dividend while PRMB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.