Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs COLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs COLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $109M | $553M | $2.85B | $1.07B | $7.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $344M | $1.39B | $427M | $3.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $32M | $243M | $73M | $550M |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 47.7% | 52.8% | 48.6% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 11.6% | 22.4% | 20.9% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 14.1x | 11.4x | 12.5x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $213M | $1.26B | $1.82B | $1.95B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $167M | $657M | $252M | $511M |
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs COLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provident Financial… (PROV) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 74.9 | -25.1% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 110.4 | +10.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs COLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PROV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.06x
- Beta 0.21 vs COLB's 1.18
KRNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 5.0%
- Beta 0.72, yield 5.0%, current ratio 1.20x
- 5.0% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8%
- +45.1% vs PROV's +14.5%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 91.9% 10Y total return vs COLB's 54.0%
- PEG 3.69 vs CFFN's 6.12
CFFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 79.3%
- 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5%
COLB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.0% vs KRNY's 1.7%
- Lower P/E (10.2x vs 12.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs COLB's 1.18 | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs PROV's +14.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% |
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs COLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs COLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COLB leads in 2 of 6 categories
PROV leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • CFFN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PROV and COLB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 53.4x PROV's $60M. WAFD is the more profitable business, keeping 17.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 9.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $344M | $1.4B | $427M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $43M | $277M | $97M | $895M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $32M | $243M | $73M | $550M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $40M | $215M | $61M | $724M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +47.7% | +52.8% | +48.6% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +11.6% | +22.4% | +20.9% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +9.4% | +17.5% | +17.1% | +17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +11.6% | +15.5% | +14.3% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +50.0% | +46.3% | +33.3% | +5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
COLB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, COLB trades at a 35% valuation discount to KRNY's 20.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WAFD offers better value at 4.58x vs CFFN's 7.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $553M | $2.9B | $1.1B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $1.6B | $4.0B | $2.8B | $10.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.40x | 20.93x | 14.10x | 15.87x | 13.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.41x | 14.06x | 11.35x | 12.50x | 10.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.58x | 7.77x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.77x | 45.76x | 13.41x | 30.52x | 12.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 1.61x | 2.02x | 2.57x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 0.74x | 0.98x | 1.02x | 1.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.38x | 25.84x | 13.71x | 21.49x | 10.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COLB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COLB delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. COLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRNY scores 7/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +4.3% | +8.0% | +7.0% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.4% | +0.9% | +0.7% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +1.1% | +3.9% | +2.0% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +1.5% | +5.7% | +2.5% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 1.68x | 0.60x | 1.86x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $160M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $167M | $657M | $252M | $511M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $1.3B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 0.22x | 0.48x | 0.41x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WAFD and COLB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,953 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,677 for CFFN. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +45.1% total return vs PROV's +14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COLB at 15.7% vs KRNY's 10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +22.6% | +17.1% | +26.5% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.5% | +45.1% | +32.5% | +44.3% | +40.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +35.2% | +37.6% | +45.5% | +55.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | -12.7% | +29.5% | -13.2% | -6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.8% | -7.2% | +91.9% | +12.8% | +54.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +10.6% | +11.2% | +13.3% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PROV and CFFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PROV is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFFN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs COLB's 95.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.72x | 0.66x | 0.90x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.42 | $8.79 | $37.10 | $8.25 | $32.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.95 | $5.76 | $26.31 | $5.71 | $21.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +99.9% | +99.9% | +100.0% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 66.7 | 63.8 | 65.4 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 293K | 525K | 759K | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRNY and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PROV as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", CFFN as "Hold", COLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.1% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs -15.2% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.01% vs WAFD's 2.84%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $9.50 | $35.00 | $7.00 | $32.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +5.0% | +2.8% | +4.1% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $0.44 | $1.05 | $0.34 | $1.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.1% | +3.6% | +0.4% | +1.5% |
COLB leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs COLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or COLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is the stronger pick with 10. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or COLB?
On trailing P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Kearny Financial Corp. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WaFd, Inc. wins at 3. 69x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 6. 12x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or COLB?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to -13. 2% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAFD returned +91. 9% versus KRNY's -7. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or COLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning COLB is approximately 471% more volatile than PROV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or COLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is pulling ahead at 10. 0% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -12. 3% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or COLB?
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 1% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COLB leads at 23. 4% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COLB leads at 67. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or COLB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 69x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 6. 12x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 15. 4x for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 8. 1% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or COLB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 2. 8% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD).
09Is PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or COLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PROV: +25. 8%, COLB: +54. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PROV and KRNY and WAFD and CFFN and COLB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PROV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.