Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $109M | $553M | $2.85B | $1.07B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $344M | $1.39B | $427M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $32M | $243M | $73M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 47.7% | 52.8% | 48.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 11.6% | 22.4% | 20.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 14.1x | 11.4x | 12.5x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $213M | $1.26B | $1.82B | $1.95B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $167M | $657M | $252M | $10.27B |
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provident Financial… (PROV) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 74.9 | -25.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PROV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 3.3%
- NIM 2.8% vs KRNY's 1.7%
- Beta 0.21 vs CFFN's 0.90, lower leverage
KRNY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 0.72, yield 5.0%, current ratio 1.20x
- 5.0% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
- +45.1% vs PROV's +14.5%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.15x
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 12.5x), PEG 3.69 vs 6.12
CFFN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 79.3%
- 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 91.9%
- PEG 2.26 vs CFFN's 6.12
- 27.8% margin vs KRNY's 9.4%
- 13.1% ROA vs KRNY's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 12.5x), PEG 3.69 vs 6.12 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs KRNY's 9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs CFFN's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs PROV's +14.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs KRNY's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.1% |
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
WAFD leads 1 • PROV leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • CFFN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 819.5x PROV's $60M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 9.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $344M | $1.4B | $427M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $43M | $277M | $97M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $32M | $243M | $73M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $40M | $215M | $61M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +47.7% | +52.8% | +48.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +11.6% | +22.4% | +20.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +9.4% | +17.5% | +17.1% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +11.6% | +15.5% | +14.3% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +50.0% | +46.3% | +33.3% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WAFD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, WAFD trades at a 48% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.43x vs CFFN's 7.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $553M | $2.9B | $1.1B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $1.6B | $4.0B | $2.8B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.40x | 20.93x | 14.10x | 15.87x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.41x | 14.06x | 11.35x | 12.50x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.58x | 7.77x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.77x | 45.76x | 13.41x | 30.52x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 1.61x | 2.02x | 2.57x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 0.74x | 0.98x | 1.02x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.38x | 25.84x | 13.71x | 21.49x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. WAFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRNY scores 7/9 vs PROV's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +4.3% | +8.0% | +7.0% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.4% | +0.9% | +0.7% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +1.1% | +3.9% | +2.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +1.5% | +5.7% | +2.5% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 1.68x | 0.60x | 1.86x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $160M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $167M | $657M | $252M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $1.3B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 0.22x | 0.48x | 0.41x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PROV and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,677 for CFFN. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +45.1% total return vs PROV's +14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PROV at 14.7% vs KRNY's 10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +22.6% | +17.1% | +26.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.5% | +45.1% | +32.5% | +44.3% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +35.2% | +37.6% | +45.5% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | -12.7% | +29.5% | -13.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.8% | -7.2% | +91.9% | +12.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +10.6% | +11.2% | +13.3% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CFFN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CFFN's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.72x | 0.66x | 0.90x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.42 | $8.79 | $37.10 | $8.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.95 | $5.76 | $26.31 | $5.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +99.9% | +99.9% | +100.0% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 66.7 | 63.8 | 65.4 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 293K | 525K | 759K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRNY and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PROV as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", CFFN as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.1% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs -15.2% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.01% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $9.50 | $35.00 | $7.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +5.0% | +2.8% | +4.1% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $0.44 | $1.05 | $0.34 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.1% | +3.6% | +0.4% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WAFD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PROV vs KRNY vs WAFD vs CFFN vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is the stronger pick with 10. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or KO?
On trailing P/E, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, WaFd, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 26x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 6. 12x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -13. 2% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus KRNY's -7. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning CFFN is approximately -548% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is pulling ahead at 10. 0% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -12. 3% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PROV leads at 65. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 26x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 6. 12x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 8. 1% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 2. 5% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO).
09Is PROV or KRNY or WAFD or CFFN or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CFFN: +12. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PROV and KRNY and WAFD and CFFN and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (PROV (Financial Services) and KRNY (Financial Services) and WAFD (Financial Services) and CFFN (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PROV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.