Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $109M | $2.16B | $4.50B | $2.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $877M | $1.89B | $1.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $126M | $392M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 68.3% | 67.4% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 18.8% | 25.7% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 10.7x | 11.5x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $213M | $446M | $1.30B | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $234M | $271M | $657M |
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provident Financial… (PROV) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 144.6 | +44.6% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PROV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and stability.
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.21 vs FULT's 0.99
NWBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 5.1%
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 23.6%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.65, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.13x
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 114.2% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 91.9%
- PEG 0.82 vs WAFD's 3.69
- NIM 3.2% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- +37.8% vs PROV's +14.5%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs FULT's 0.99 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.8% vs PROV's +14.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% |
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FULT leads in 2 of 6 categories
PROV leads 0 • NWBI leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NWBI and FULT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 31.5x PROV's $60M. FULT is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PROV's 11.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $877M | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $166M | $529M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $126M | $392M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $142M | $267M | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +68.3% | +67.4% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +18.8% | +25.7% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +14.4% | +20.7% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +16.2% | +14.1% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +19.2% | +47.2% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PROV and FULT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.2x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 39% valuation discount to PROV's 18.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $2.2B | $4.5B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $2.4B | $5.5B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.40x | 16.08x | 11.23x | 14.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.41x | 10.74x | 11.49x | 11.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.96x | 0.80x | 4.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.77x | 14.42x | 10.43x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 2.47x | 2.38x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.15x | 1.23x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.38x | 15.26x | 15.81x | 13.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for PROV. NWBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PROV's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWBI scores 7/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +7.2% | +11.6% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +5.6% | +7.5% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +6.8% | +9.5% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.24x | 0.37x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $160M | $213M | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $234M | $271M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $446M | $1.3B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 0.73x | 0.84x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FULT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FULT five years ago would be worth $16,107 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,816 for PROV. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +37.8% total return vs PROV's +14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 25.1% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +26.8% | +21.0% | +17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.5% | +24.5% | +37.8% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +50.2% | +96.0% | +37.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | +32.1% | +61.1% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.8% | +53.8% | +114.2% | +91.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +14.5% | +25.1% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PROV and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PROV is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.65x | 0.99x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.42 | $14.80 | $23.48 | $37.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.95 | $11.25 | $16.60 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +100.0% | +99.5% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 65.2 | 68.1 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 947K | 1.7M | 525K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWBI and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PROV as "Hold", NWBI as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 0.6% upside for FULT (target: $24) vs -6.5% for PROV (target: $16). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.06% vs WAFD's 2.84%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $14.67 | $23.50 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 14 | 20 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +5.1% | +3.3% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 5 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $0.75 | $0.77 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +3.6% |
FULT leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (PROV) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 11.
2x versus Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. at 18. 4x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) delivered a total return of +61.
1%, compared to +18. 2% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (PROV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FULT returned +114. 2% versus PROV's +25. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning FULT is approximately 378% more volatile than PROV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 166% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -12. 3% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
7% net margin versus 10. 4% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FULT leads at 25. 7% versus 14. 8% for PROV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWBI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 4x for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FULT: 0. 6% to $23. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 1%, versus 2. 8% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD).
09Is PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PROV: +25. 8%, FULT: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PROV and NWBI and FULT and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PROV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.