Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PROV logo
PROV
NWBI logo
NWBI
FULT logo
FULT
WAFD logo
WAFD
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PROV
Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$109M
5Y Perf.+27.6%
NWBI
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.16B
5Y Perf.+44.6%
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.85B
5Y Perf.+38.1%

PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PROV logoPROV
NWBI logoNWBI
FULT logoFULT
WAFD logoWAFD
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$109M$2.16B$4.50B$2.85B
Revenue (TTM)$60M$877M$1.89B$1.39B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$126M$392M$243M
Gross Margin67.8%68.3%67.4%52.8%
Operating Margin16.2%18.8%25.7%22.4%
Forward P/E15.4x10.7x11.5x11.4x
Total Debt$213M$446M$1.30B$1.82B
Cash & Equiv.$53M$234M$271M$657M

PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PROV
NWBI
FULT
WAFD
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Provident Financial… (PROV)100127.6+27.6%
Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI)100144.6+44.6%
Fulton Financial Co… (FULT)100221.8+121.8%
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD)100138.1+38.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PROV and NWBI are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. WAFD and FULT also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PROV
Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PROV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and stability.

  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.21 vs FULT's 0.99
Best for: value and stability
NWBI
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

NWBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 5.1%
  • Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 23.6%, current ratio 0.13x
  • Beta 0.65, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.13x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 114.2% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 91.9%
  • PEG 0.82 vs WAFD's 3.69
  • NIM 3.2% vs WAFD's 2.5%
  • +37.8% vs PROV's +14.5%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.
The Banking Pick

WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNWBI logoNWBI16.3% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
ValuePROV logoPROVBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsWAFD logoWAFDEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyPROV logoPROVBeta 0.21 vs FULT's 0.99
DividendsNWBI logoNWBI5.1% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8%
Momentum (1Y)FULT logoFULT+37.8% vs PROV's +14.5%
Efficiency (ROA)WAFD logoWAFDEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5%

PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PROVProvident Financial Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Debit Card
53.2%$1M
Deposit Account
46.8%$1M
NWBINorthwest Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Segment
100.0%$879M
FULTFulton Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
32.8%$85M
Fiduciary and Trust
32.7%$85M
Deposit Account
21.4%$56M
Service, Other
7.7%$20M
Mortgage Banking
5.4%$14M
WAFDWaFd, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFULTLAGGINGWAFD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NWBI and FULT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 31.5x PROV's $60M. FULT is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PROV's 11.0%.

MetricPROV logoPROVProvident Financi…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$60M$877M$1.9B$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$166M$529M$277M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M$126M$392M$243M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$142M$267M$215M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+67.8%+68.3%+67.4%+52.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.2%+18.8%+25.7%+22.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.0%+14.4%+20.7%+17.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.3%+16.2%+14.1%+15.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+69.2%+19.2%+47.2%+46.3%
Evenly matched — NWBI and FULT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PROV and FULT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.2x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 39% valuation discount to PROV's 18.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPROV logoPROVProvident Financi…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$109M$2.2B$4.5B$2.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$269M$2.4B$5.5B$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.40x16.08x11.23x14.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.41x10.74x11.49x11.35x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.96x0.80x4.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.77x14.42x10.43x13.41x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.81x2.47x2.38x2.02x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.90x1.15x1.23x0.98x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.38x15.26x15.81x13.71x
Evenly matched — PROV and FULT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FULT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FULT delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for PROV. NWBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PROV's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWBI scores 7/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPROV logoPROVProvident Financi…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.1%+7.2%+11.6%+8.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+0.8%+1.2%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.9%+5.6%+7.5%+3.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.4%+6.8%+9.5%+5.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96767
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.66x0.24x0.37x0.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$160M$213M$1.0B$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$53M$234M$271M$657M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$213M$446M$1.3B$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.47x0.73x0.84x0.48x
FULT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FULT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FULT five years ago would be worth $16,107 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,816 for PROV. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +37.8% total return vs PROV's +14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 25.1% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPROV logoPROVProvident Financi…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.8%+26.8%+21.0%+17.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+14.5%+24.5%+37.8%+32.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.9%+50.2%+96.0%+37.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.2%+32.1%+61.1%+29.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+25.8%+53.8%+114.2%+91.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.7%+14.5%+25.1%+11.2%
FULT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PROV and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PROV is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricPROV logoPROVProvident Financi…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.21x0.65x0.99x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.42$14.80$23.48$37.10
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.95$11.25$16.60$26.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.2%+100.0%+99.5%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.865.268.163.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K947K1.7M525K
Evenly matched — PROV and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NWBI and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PROV as "Hold", NWBI as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 0.6% upside for FULT (target: $24) vs -6.5% for PROV (target: $16). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.06% vs WAFD's 2.84%.

MetricPROV logoPROVProvident Financi…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.00$14.67$23.50$35.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts10142011
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.3%+5.1%+3.3%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00516
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.56$0.75$0.77$1.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.1%0.0%+1.5%+3.6%
Evenly matched — NWBI and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FULT leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallFulton Financial Corporation (FULT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (PROV) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?

On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 11.

2x versus Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. at 18. 4x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?

Over the past 5 years, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) delivered a total return of +61.

1%, compared to +18. 2% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (PROV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FULT returned +114. 2% versus PROV's +25. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.

(PROV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning FULT is approximately 378% more volatile than PROV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 166% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -12. 3% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?

Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

7% net margin versus 10. 4% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FULT leads at 25. 7% versus 14. 8% for PROV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWBI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 4x for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FULT: 0. 6% to $23. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 1%, versus 2. 8% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD).

09

Is PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.

(PROV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PROV: +25. 8%, FULT: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PROV and NWBI and FULT and WAFD?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PROV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.