Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD vs CVBF vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD vs CVBF vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $109M | $2.16B | $4.50B | $2.85B | $2.88B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $877M | $1.89B | $1.39B | $644M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $126M | $392M | $243M | $209M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 68.3% | 67.4% | 52.8% | 79.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 18.8% | 25.7% | 22.4% | 43.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 10.7x | 11.5x | 11.4x | 14.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $213M | $446M | $1.30B | $1.82B | $991M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $234M | $271M | $657M | $108M | $343.34B |
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD vs CVBF vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provident Financial… (PROV) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 144.6 | +44.6% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD vs CVBF vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PROV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.21 vs FULT's 0.99
NWBI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 5.1%
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 23.6%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.65, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.13x
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.2% vs JPM's 2.2%
- +37.8% vs PROV's +14.5%
WAFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5%
CVBF doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FULT's 114.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs CVBF's 4.64
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 4.64
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 4.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs FULT's 0.99 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.8% vs PROV's +14.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% |
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD vs CVBF vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD vs CVBF vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
FULT leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • PROV leads 0 • NWBI leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4661.3x PROV's $60M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PROV's 11.0%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $877M | $1.9B | $1.4B | $644M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $166M | $529M | $277M | $294M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $126M | $392M | $243M | $209M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $142M | $267M | $215M | $217M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +68.3% | +67.4% | +52.8% | +79.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +18.8% | +25.7% | +22.4% | +43.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +14.4% | +20.7% | +17.5% | +32.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +16.2% | +14.1% | +15.5% | +33.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +19.2% | +47.2% | +46.3% | +11.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.2x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 39% valuation discount to PROV's 18.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $2.2B | $4.5B | $2.9B | $2.9B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $2.4B | $5.5B | $4.0B | $3.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.40x | 16.08x | 11.23x | 14.10x | 13.97x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.41x | 10.74x | 11.49x | 11.35x | 14.74x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.96x | 0.80x | 4.58x | 4.40x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.77x | 14.42x | 10.43x | 13.41x | 13.37x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 2.47x | 2.38x | 2.02x | 4.48x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.15x | 1.23x | 0.98x | 1.26x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.38x | 15.26x | 15.81x | 13.71x | 13.26x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PROV and NWBI and FULT and CVBF each lead in 2 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for PROV. NWBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWBI scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +7.2% | +11.6% | +8.0% | +9.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +0.9% | +1.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +5.6% | +7.5% | +3.9% | +6.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +6.8% | +9.5% | +5.7% | +9.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.24x | 0.37x | 0.60x | 0.43x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $160M | $213M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $883M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $234M | $271M | $657M | $108M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $446M | $1.3B | $1.8B | $991M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 0.73x | 0.84x | 0.48x | 2.12x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,522 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +37.8% total return vs PROV's +14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +26.8% | +21.0% | +17.1% | +14.8% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.5% | +24.5% | +37.8% | +32.5% | +16.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +50.2% | +96.0% | +37.6% | +64.4% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | +32.1% | +61.1% | +29.5% | +15.2% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.8% | +53.8% | +114.2% | +91.9% | +66.9% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +14.5% | +25.1% | +11.2% | +18.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PROV and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PROV is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWBI currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.65x | 0.99x | 0.66x | 0.81x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.42 | $14.80 | $23.48 | $37.10 | $21.48 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.95 | $11.25 | $16.60 | $26.31 | $17.95 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +100.0% | +99.5% | +99.9% | +98.8% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 65.2 | 68.1 | 63.8 | 60.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 947K | 1.7M | 525K | 1.6M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWBI and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PROV as "Hold", NWBI as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -6.5% for PROV (target: $16). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.06% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $14.67 | $23.50 | $35.00 | $24.75 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 14 | 20 | 11 | 16 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +5.1% | +3.3% | +2.8% | +3.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $0.75 | $0.77 | $1.05 | $0.82 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +3.6% | +2.8% | +3.9% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FULT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PROV vs NWBI vs FULT vs WAFD vs CVBF vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD or CVBF or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD or CVBF or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 11.
2x versus Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. at 18. 4x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD or CVBF or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +15. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PROV's +25. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD or CVBF or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning FULT is approximately 378% more volatile than PROV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD or CVBF or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -12. 3% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD or CVBF or JPM?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 10. 4% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 14. 8% for PROV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD or CVBF or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 4x for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD or CVBF or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 1%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is PROV or NWBI or FULT or WAFD or CVBF or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PROV: +25. 8%, FULT: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PROV and NWBI and FULT and WAFD and CVBF and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PROV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.