Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs KRNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs KRNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $109M | $2.85B | $5.58B | $2.16B | $553M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $1.39B | $1.37B | $877M | $344M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $243M | $475M | $126M | $32M |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 52.8% | 77.3% | 68.3% | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 22.4% | 43.8% | 18.8% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 11.4x | 11.5x | 10.7x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $213M | $1.82B | $935M | $446M | $1.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $657M | $667M | $234M | $167M |
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs KRNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provident Financial… (PROV) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 183.7 | +83.7% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 144.6 | +44.6% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs KRNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PROV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.21 vs KRNY's 0.72, lower leverage
WAFD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 91.9% 10Y total return vs NWBI's 53.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5%
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.87 vs WAFD's 3.69
- NIM 3.8% vs KRNY's 1.7%
- PEG 0.87 vs 3.69
NWBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 23.6%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.65, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.13x
- 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
KRNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 130.2%
- +45.1% vs HOMB's +3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3% | |
| Value | PEG 0.87 vs 3.69 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs KRNY's 0.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs HOMB's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PROV's 0.5% |
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs KRNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs KRNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 3 of 6 categories
PROV leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • NWBI leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 23.1x PROV's $60M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 9.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $1.4B | $1.4B | $877M | $344M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $277M | $618M | $166M | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $243M | $475M | $126M | $32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $215M | $311M | $142M | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +52.8% | +77.3% | +68.3% | +47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +22.4% | +43.8% | +18.8% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +17.5% | +34.6% | +14.4% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +15.5% | +22.6% | +16.2% | +11.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +46.3% | +26.0% | +19.2% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 44% valuation discount to KRNY's 20.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $2.9B | $5.6B | $2.2B | $553M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $4.0B | $5.9B | $2.4B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.40x | 14.10x | 11.72x | 16.08x | 20.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.41x | 11.35x | 11.47x | 10.74x | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.58x | 0.89x | 1.96x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.77x | 13.41x | 9.47x | 14.42x | 45.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 2.02x | 4.06x | 2.47x | 1.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 0.98x | 1.30x | 1.15x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.38x | 13.71x | 11.58x | 15.26x | 25.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. HOMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs HOMB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +8.0% | +11.4% | +7.2% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.9% | +2.1% | +0.8% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +3.9% | +8.7% | +5.6% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +5.7% | +11.5% | +6.8% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.60x | 0.22x | 0.24x | 1.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $160M | $1.2B | $268M | $213M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $657M | $667M | $234M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $1.8B | $935M | $446M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 0.48x | 1.47x | 0.73x | 0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PROV and NWBI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NWBI five years ago would be worth $13,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,728 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +45.1% total return vs HOMB's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PROV at 14.7% vs HOMB's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +17.1% | +2.7% | +26.8% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.5% | +32.5% | +3.0% | +24.5% | +45.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +37.6% | +31.2% | +50.2% | +35.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | +29.5% | +22.1% | +32.1% | -12.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.8% | +91.9% | +57.7% | +53.8% | -7.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +11.2% | +9.5% | +14.5% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PROV and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PROV is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRNY's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWBI currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.66x | 0.66x | 0.65x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.42 | $37.10 | $30.83 | $14.80 | $8.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.95 | $26.31 | $25.50 | $11.25 | $5.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +99.9% | +91.6% | +100.0% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 63.8 | 63.7 | 65.2 | 66.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 525K | 1.4M | 947K | 293K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WAFD and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PROV as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", NWBI as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -6.5% for PROV (target: $16). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.06% vs WAFD's 2.84%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $35.00 | $31.50 | $14.67 | $9.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 11 | 19 | 14 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +2.8% | +2.8% | +5.1% | +5.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $1.05 | $0.80 | $0.75 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +3.6% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
HOMB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs KRNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PROV or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or KRNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (PROV) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or KRNY?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus Kearny Financial Corp. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or KRNY?
Over the past 5 years, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) delivered a total return of +32. 1%, compared to -12. 7% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAFD returned +91. 9% versus KRNY's -7. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or KRNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Kearny Financial Corp. 's 0. 72β — meaning KRNY is approximately 247% more volatile than PROV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or KRNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -12. 3% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or KRNY?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PROV or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or KRNY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 4x for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 11. 5% to $31. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or KRNY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 1%, versus 2. 8% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD).
09Is PROV or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or KRNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PROV: +25. 8%, KRNY: -7. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PROV and WAFD and HOMB and NWBI and KRNY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PROV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.